Static stance response to different types of foot orthoses

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 93, Issue 1-6, 2003, Pages 492-498

  Payne, Craig ^a   Oates, Matthew ^a   Noakes, Hazel ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT DISEASE; GAIT; HUMAN; JOINT MOBILITY; MALE; ORTHOSIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDING;

EID: 1842634498     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/87507315-93-6-492     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. PAYNE CB: The past, present, and future of podiatric biomechanics. JAPMA 88: 53, 1998.
2. LANDORF KB, KEENAN AM: Efficacy of foot orthoses: what does the literature tell us? Australas J Podiatr Med 32: 105, 1998.
3. ROOT ML: Development of the functional orthosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 11: 183, 1994.
4. BLAKE RL, FERGUSON H: "The Inverted Orthotic Technique: Its Role in Clinical Biomechanics," in Clinical Biomechanics of the Lower Extremities, ed by RL Valmassy, p 466, CV Mosby, St Louis, 1996.
5. GARDNER C, COULL D, COULL R: "DC Inverted Wedge: Less Degrees of Orthotic Correction-Greater Degrees of Foot Control," in Proceedings of the 17th Australian Podiatry Conference, ed by AM Keenan, HB Menz, p 107, Australasian Podiatry Council, Melbourne, April 1996.
6. COLSON JM, BERGLUND G: An effective orthotic design for controlling the unstable subtalar joint. Orthot Prosthet 33: 39, 1979.
7. DANANBERG HJ: Gait style as an etiology to chronic postural pain: part I. Functional hallux limitus. JAPMA 83: 433, 1993.
8. KIRBY KA: The medial heel skive technique: improving pronation control in foot orthoses. JAPMA 82: 177, 1992.
9. ROOT ML, ORIEN WP, WEED JH, ET AL: Biomechanical Examination of the Foot, Vol 1, Clinical Biomechanics Corp, Los Angeles, 1971.
10. MENZ HB: Clinical hindfoot measurement: a critical review of the literature. The Foot 5: 57, 1995.
11. HAMIL J, BATES BT, KNUTZEN KM: Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 4: 217, 1989.
12. MCPOIL TG, CORNWALL MW: The relationship between static and lower extremity measures and rearfoot motion in gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 24: 309, 1996.
13. REDMOND A, BURNS J, CROSBIE J, ET AL: An initial appraisal of the validity of a criterion based, observational clinical rating system for foot posture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31: 160, 2001.
14. REDMOND A, CROSBIE J, PEAT J, ET AL: "A New Criterion Based, Composite Clinical Rating System for the Quantification of Foot Posture: Its Validation and Use in Clinical Trials" [abstract]. Presented at the 19th Australasian Podiatry Conference, May 16, 2001, Canberra, Australia.
15. NOAKES H, PAYNE C: The reliability of the manual supination resistance test. JAPMA 93: 185, 2003.
16. PAYNE C, MUNTEANU S, MILLER K: Position of the subtalar joint axis and resistance of the rearfoot to supination. JAPMA 93: 131, 2003.
17. KIRBY KA, GREEN DR: "Evaluation and Nonoperative Management of Pes Valgus," in Foot and Ankle Disorders in Children, ed by S DeValentine, p 295, Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1992.
18. KIRBY KA: Foot and Lower Extremity Biomechanics: A Ten Year Collection of Precision Intricast Newsletters, Precision Intricast Inc, Payton, AZ, 1997.
19. VINICOMBE A, RASPOVIC A, MENZ HB: Reliability of navicular displacement measurement as a clinical indicator of foot posture. JAPMA 91: 262, 2001.
20. PAYNE CB, RICHARDSON MR: Changes in the measurement of RCSP and NCSP with experience. The Foot 10: 81, 2000.
21. KIRBY KA: Methods for determination of the positional variations in the subtalar joint axis. JAPMA 77: 228, 1987.
22. VALMASSY RL, TERRAFRANCA N: The triplane wedge: an adjunctive treatment modality in pediatric biomechanics. JAPMA 76: 672, 1986.
23. JAY RM, SCHOENHAUS HD, SEYMOUR C, ET AL: The dynamic stabilizing innersole system (DSIS): the management of hyperpronation in children. J Foot Ankle Surg 34: 124, 1995.
24. NIGG BM, NURSE MA, STEFANYSHYN DJ: Shoe inserts and orthotics for sport and physical activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31 (suppl 7): S421, 1999.
25. PAYNE CB, CHUTER V: The clash between the science and theory on the kinematic effectiveness of foot orthoses. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 18: 705, 2001.
26. VAN LANGELAAN EJ: A kinematical analysis of the tarsal joints: an x-ray photogrammetric study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 204: 1, 1983.
27. BENICK RJ: The constraint mechanism of the human tarsus: a roentgenological study. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 215: 1, 1985.
28. NIGG BM, KHAN A, FISHER V, ET AL: Effect of shoe insert construction on foot and leg movement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 550, 1998.
29. STACOFF A, REINSCHMIDT C, NIGG BM, ET AL: Effects of foot orthoses on skeletal motion during running. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15: 54, 2000.