An objective and time-efficient method for determining severity of childhood speech delay

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-65

  Johnson, Carol A ^a   Weston, Audrey D ^b   Bain, Barbara A ^c  

^a Nampa School District   (United States)

^b Idaho State University Boise   (United States)

^c IDAHO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Connected speech sample; Imitation; Percentage of consonants correct; Severity; Speech delay

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMITATION; MALE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRODUCTIVITY; SAMPLING; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH DISORDER; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1842633815     PISSN: 10580360     EISSN: 15589110     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1044/1058-0360(2004/007)     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Andrews, N., & Fey, M. E. (1986). Analysis of the speech of phonologically impaired children in two sampling conditions. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 17, 187-198.
2. Bankson, N., & Bernthal, J. (1982). A comparison of phonological processes identified through word and sentence imitation tasks of the PPA. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 13, 96-99.
3. Benner, S. M. (1992). Assessing young children with special needs. New York: Longman.
4. Broen, P., Doyle, S., & Bacon, C. (1993). The velopharyngeally inadequate child: Phonologic change with intervention. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal, 30, 500-507.
5. Carter, E., & Buck, M. (1958). Prognostic testing for functional articulation disorders among children in the first grade. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 23, 124-133.
6. Day, A. (1993). Carl goes to daycare. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.
7. Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznick, S., Thal, D., Bates, E., Hartung, J., et al. (1993). The MacArthur Communicative Development Inventories. San Diego, CA: Singular.
8. Frattali, C. M. (1998). Outcomes measurement: Definitions, dimensions, and perspectives. In C. M. Frattali (Ed.), Measuring outcomes in speech-language pathology (pp. 1-27). New York: Thieme.
9. Garrett, K., & Moran, M. (1992). A comparison of phonological severity measures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 23, 48-51.
10. Gordon-Brannan, M., & Hodson, B. (2000). Intelligibility/severity measurements of prekindergarten children's speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 9, 141-150.
11. Haynes W., & Steed, S. (1987). Multiphonemic scoring of articulation in imitative sentences: Some preliminary data. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 18, 4-14.
12. Hodson, B. W. (1986) The Assessment of Phonological Processes-Revised. Austin TX: Pro-Ed.
13. Hodson, B. W., & Paden, E. (1991). Targeting intelligible speech. San Diego, CA: Pro-Ed.
14. Kent, R. D., Miolo, G., & Bloedel, S. (1994). The intelligibility of children's speech: A review of evaluation procedures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 81-95.
15. Kreshek, J., & Socolofsky, G. (1972). Imitative and spontaneous articulatory assessment of four-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15, 729-732.
16. Kwiatkowski, J., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Intelligibility assessment in developmental phonological disorders: Accuracy of caregiver gloss. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 1095-1104.
17. McReynolds, L., & Kearns, K. (1983). Single-subject experimental designs in communicative disorders. Baltimore: University Park Press.
18. Miccio, A. W. (2002). Clinical problem solving: Assessment of phonological disorders. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 221-228.
19. Miller, J. F. (1981). Assessing language production in children: Experimental procedures. Baltimore: University Park Press.
20. Miller, J. F., & Chapman, R. (1975). Length variables in sentence imitation. Language and Speech, 18, 35-41.
21. Morris, S., Wilcox, K., & Schooling, T. (1995). The Preschool Speech Intelligibility Measure. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(4), 22-28.
22. Morrison, J., & Shriberg, L. D. (1992). Articulation testing versus conversational speech sampling. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 259-273.
23. Olswang, L. B., & Bain, B. A. (1994). Data collection: Monitoring children's treatment progress. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3(3), 55-66.
24. Olswang, L. B., & Bain, B. A. (2001). Data collection for monitoring client change: Moving into the 21st century. In C. Fratelli & R. Lubinski (Eds.), Professional issues in speech-language pathology and audiology (pp. 437-456). San Diego, CA: Singular.
25. Paden, E., & Moss, S. (1985). Comparison of three phonological analysis procedures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 16, 103-109.
26. Paul, R. (1995). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence: Assessment and intervention. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
27. Paynter, E., & Bumpas, T. (1977). Imitative and spontaneous articulatory assessment of three-year-old children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 42, 119-125.
28. Pena-Brooks, A., & Hegde, M. N. (2000). Assessment and treatment of articulation and phonological disorders in children. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
29. Rafaat, S., Rvachew, S., & Russell, R. (1995). Reliability of clinician judgments of severity of phonological impairment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4(3), 39-46.
30. Shriberg, L. D. (1986). Programs to Examine Phonetic and Phonologic Evaluation Records (PEPPER) [Computer software]. Madison: University of Wisconsin, Software Development and Distribution Center.
31. Shriberg, L. D., Austin, D., Lewis, B., McSweeny, J., & Wilson, D. (1997). The percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metric: Extensions and reliability data. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 708-722.
32. Shriberg, L. D., & Kent, R. D. (1995). Clinical phonetics (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
33. Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1982). Phonological disorders III: A procedure for assessing severity of involvement. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47, 256-270.
34. Shriberg, L. D., & Kwiatkowski, J. (1985). Continuous speech sampling for phonologic analysis of speech-delayed children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 50, 323-334.
35. Shriberg, L. D., Kwiatkowski, J., Best, S., Hengst, J., & Terselic-Weber, B. (1986). Characteristics of children with phonologic disorders of unknown origin. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 140-161.
36. Shriberg, L. D., & Lof, G. (1991). Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 5, 225-279.
37. Siegel, G., Winitz, H., & Conkey, H. (1963). The influence of testing instruments on articulatory responses in children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 28, 67-76.
38. Sturner, R., Kunze, L., Funk, S., & Green, J. (1993). Elicited imitation: Its effectiveness for speech and language screening. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 35, 715-726.
39. Tyler, A. A. (2002). Speech-language assessment in the clinical setting. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 215-220.
40. Tyler, A. A., Miccio, A. W., Hoffman, P. R., Hodson, B., & Bleile, K. (2002). Five views of the elephant: Perspectives on the assessment of articulation and phonology in preschoolers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 213-214.
41. Watson, M. M. (1989). Comparison of three methods for eliciting phonological processes by a sample of educable mentally impaired children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 69, 771-778.
42. Watson, M. M., & Hiipakka, J. (1992). Consistency of use of phonological processes by a sample of educable mentally impaired children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 211-218.