Simulated patient versus clinician marking of doctors' performance: Which is more accurate? [2]

Medical Education

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 456-

  Thistlethwaite, Jill ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COMPETENCE; CONSULTATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NOMENCLATURE; PATIENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICIAN; RATING SCALE; SIMULATION; SKILL; STANDARDIZATION; SURGEON; TELECOMMUNICATION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT SIMULATION; PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY;

EID: 1842633682     PISSN: 03080110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01828.x     Document Type: Letter

References (1)

1. Clever SL, Novack DH, Cohen DG, Levinson W. Evaluating surgeons' informed shared decision making skills: pilot test using a videoconferenced standardised patient. Med Educ 2003;37:1094-9.