A Report on the First Year of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX'02)

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 55, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 551-556

  Kazai, Gabriella ^a   Lalmas, Mounia ^a   Fuhr, Norbert ^b   Gövert, Norbert ^c  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

^c TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; CONTENT BASED RETRIEVAL; DATA ACQUISITION; PROBABILITY; SEMANTICS; XML;

QUANTIZATION FUNCTION; TEST COLLECTION;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS;

EID: 1842629746     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10386     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Baeza-Yates, R., Fuhr, N., & Maarek, Y.S. (Eds.). (2002). Proceedings of the SIGIR 2002 Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval, Tampere, Finland. New York, NY: ACM Press.
2. Baeza-Yates, R., Fuhr, N., Sacks-Davis, R., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.). (2000). Proceedings of the SIGIR 2000 Workshop on XML and Information Retrieval, Athens, Greece. New York, NY: ACM Press.
3. Blanken, H., Schenkel, R. Grabs, T., & Weikum, G. (Eds.). (2003). Intelligent search on XML data, New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
4. Cleverdon, C.W., Mills, J., & Keen, E.M. (1966). Factors determining the performance of indexing systems, vol. 2: Test results. Technical report, Aslib Cranfield Research Project, Cranfield.
5. Cooper, W.S. (1968). Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on weak ordering action of retrieval systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 19, 30-41.
6. Fuhr, N., Gövert, N., Kazai, G. & Lalmas, M. (Eds.). (2003). Proceedings of the First Workshop of the INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval (INEX), Dagstuhl, Germany, December 8-11, 2002, ERCIM Workshop Proceedings, March 2003.
7. Harman, D. (1995). The TREC conferences (pp. 9-28). In R. Kuhlen (Ed.), Proceedings of the Hypertext - Information Retrieval-Multimedia (HIM '95), Konstanz, Germany.
8. Kazai, G., Gövert, N., Lalmas, M., & Fuhr, N. (2003). The INEX Evaluation Initiative. In Blanken et al. (Eds.), Intelligent search on XML data. New York/Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
9. Kekäläinen, J., & Järvelin, K. (2002). Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(13), 2002.
10. Raghavan, V.V., Bollmann, P., & Jung, G.S. (1989). A critical investigation of recall and precision as measures of retrieval system performance. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 7(3), 205-229.
11. Saracevic, T. (1995). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval (pp. 138-146). In Proceedings of the 18th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, Seattle, USA. New York, NY: ACM Press.
12. Voorhees, E.M., & Harman, D.K. (Eds.). (2002). The tenth text retrieval conference (TREC 2001), Gaithersburg, MD. Gaithersburg, MD: NIST.