Technology in early childhood mathematics: Building blocks as an innovative technology-based curriculum

Engaging Young Children in Mathematics: Standards for Early Childhood Mathematics Education

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 361-375

  Sarama, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842628814     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (37)

1. Aubrey, C. (1997). Children's early learning of number in school and out. In I.Thompson (Ed.), Teaching and learning early number (pp. 20-29). Philadelphia: Open University Press.
2. Bowman, B.T., Donovan, M.S., & Burns, M.S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
3. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.). (1999). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Clements, D.H. (1984). Training effects on the development and generalization of Piagetian logical operations and knowledge of number. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 766-776.
5. Clements, D.H. (1999a). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children. In J.V.Copley (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 66-79). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
6. Clements, D.H. (1999b). Subitizing: What is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, 400-405.
7. Clements, D.H. (2001). Mathematics in the preschool. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7, 270-275.
8. Clements, D.H. (2002). Linking research and curriculum development. In L.D.English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 599-630). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Clements, D.H., & Battista, M.T. (1992). Geometry and spatial reasoning. In D.A.Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 420-464). New York: Macmillan.
10. Clements, D.H., & Battista, M.T. (2000). Designing effective software. In A.E.Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 761-776). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Clements, D.H., & McMillen, S. (1996). Rethinking "concrete" manipulatives. Teaching Children Mathematics, 2(5), 270-279.
12. Clements, D.H., & Nastasi, B.K. (1992). Computers and early childhood education. In M. Gettinger, S.N.Elliott, & T.R.Kratochwill (Eds.), Advances in school psychology: Preschool and early childhood treatment directions (pp. 187-246). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13. Clements, D.H., Nastasi, B.K., & Swaminathan, S. (1993). Young children and computers: Crossroads and directions from research. Young Children, 48(2), 56-64.
14. Clements, D.H., & Swaminathan, S. (1995). Technology and school change: New lamps for old?. Childhood Education, 71, 275-281.
15. Clements, D.H., Swaminathan, S., Hannibal, M.A.Z., & Sarama, J. (1999). Young children's concepts of shape. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 192-212.
16. Confrey, J. (1996). The role of new technologies in designing mathematics education. In C. Fisher, D.C.Dwyer, & K.Yocam (Eds.), Education and technology, reflections on computing in the classroom (pp. 129-149). San Francisco: Apple Press.
17. Davidson, J., & Wright, J., L. (1994). The potential of the microcomputer in the early childhood classroom. In J.L.Wright & D.D.Shade (Eds.), Young children: Active learners in a technological age (pp. 77-91). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
18. Escobedo, T.H., & Evans, S. (1997, March). A comparison of child-tested early childhood education software with professional ratings. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
19. Fuson, K.C. (1988). Children's counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer-Verlag.
20. Fuson, K.C. (1997). Research-based mathematics curricula: New educational goals require programs of four interacting levels of research. Issues in Education, 3(1), 67-79.
21. Gelman, R. (1994). Constructivism and supporting environments. In D.Tirosh (Ed.), Implicit and explicit knowledge: An educational approach (Vol. 6, pp. 55-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22. Ginsburg, H.P., Inoue, N., & Seo, K.H. (1999). Young children doing mathematics: Observations of everyday activities. In J.V.Copley (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 87-89). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
23. Gravemeijer, K.P. E. (1991). An instruction-theoretical reflection on the use of manipulatives. In L.Streefland (Ed.), Realistic mathematics education in primary school (pp. 57-76). Utrecht, Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University.
24. Griffin, S., Case, R., & Capodilupo, A. (1995). Teaching for understanding: The importance of the Central Conceptual Structures in the elementary mathematics curriculum. In A. McKeough, J.Lupart, & A.Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
25. Haugland, S.W. (2000). What role should technology play in young children's learning? Part 2. Early childhood classrooms in the 21st century: Using computers to maximize learning. Young Children, 55(1), 12-18.
26. Haugland, S.W., & Wright, J.L. (1997). Young children and technology: A world of discovery. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
27. Hiebert, J.C., & Wearne, D. (1992). Links between teaching and learning place value with understanding in first grade. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23, 98-122.
28. Lehrer, R., Jenkins, M., & Osana, H. (1998). Longitudinal study of children's reasoning about space and geometry. In R.Lehrer & D.Chazan (Eds.), Designing learning environments for developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 137-167), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Reich, S., Subrahmanyam, K., & Gelman, R. (1999, April). Children's use of number and amount information when making judgments about quantity. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM.
30. Sarama, J., & Clements, D.H. (2002). Learning and teaching with computers in early childhood education. In O.N.Saracho & B.Spodek (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives in early childhood education (pp. 171-219). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
31. Sarama, J., & Clements, D.H. (in press). Linking research and software development. In K. Heid & G.Blume (Eds.), Technology in the learning and teaching of mathematics: Syntheses and perspectives. New York: Information Age Publishing.
32. Sarama, J., Clements, D.H., & Vukelic, E.B. (1996). The role of a computer manipulative in fostering specific psychological/mathematical processes. In E.Jakubowski, D.Watkins, & H.Biske (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighteenth annual meeting of the North America Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 567-572). Columbus, OH: ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
33. Shade, D.D. (1994). Computers and young children: Software types, social contexts, gender, age, and emotional responses. Journal of Computing in Childhood Education, 5(2), 177-209.
34. Siegler, R.S. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Trafton, P.R., & Hartman, C.L. (1997). Developing number sense and computational strategies in problem-centered classrooms. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(4), 230-233.
36. Wilensky, U. (1991). Abstract mediations on the concrete and concrete implications for mathematics education. In I.Harel & S.Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 193-199). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
37. Wright, J. (1998). A new look at integrating technology into the curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 26(2), 107-109.