Experimental assessment of gradual deformation method

Mathematical Geology

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 65-77

  Liu, Ning ^a   Oliver, Dean S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Local perturbation; Markov chain; Monte Carlo; Randomized maximum likelihood

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON RESERVOIR; MARKOV CHAIN; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

EID: 1842616159     PISSN: 08828121     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:MATG.0000016230.52968.6e     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bonet-Cunha, L., Oliver, D. S., Rednar, R. A., and Reynolds, A. C., 1998, A hybrid Markov chain Monte Carlo method for generating permeability fields conditioned to multiwell pressure data and prior information: SPE J., v. 3, no. 1, p. 261-271.
2. Hegstad, B. K., and Omre, H., 1997, Uncertainty assessment in history matching and forecasting, in Baafi, E. F., and Schofield, N. A., eds., Geostatistics Wollongong' 96, v. 1: Kluwer Academic, p. 585-596.
3. Hegstad, B. K., and Omre, H., 2001, Uncertainty in production forecasts based on well observations, seismic data and production history: SPE J. v. 6, no. 4, p. 409-424.
4. Holden, L., Skare, Ø., Omre, H., and Tjelmeland, H., 2001, Sampling algorithms for Bayesian history matching. Tech. Rep. No. SAND/04/01: Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway.
5. Hu, L. Y., 2000, Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of gaussian-related stochastic models, Math. Geol., v. 32, no. 1, 87-108.
6. Hu, L. Y., Ravalec, M. L., and Blanc, G., 2001. Gradual deformation and iterative calibration of truncated Gaussian simulations: Petrol. Geosci., v. 7, p. 25-30.
7. Hu, L. Y., Ravalec, M. L., Blanc, G., Roggero, F., Nœtinger, B., Haas, A., and Corre, B., 1999, Reducing uncertainties in production forecasts by constraining geological modeling to dynamic data, SPE paper no. 56703, p. 1-8.
8. Le Ravalec, M., Hu, L. Y., and Nœtinger, B., 1999, Stochastic reservoir modeling constrained to dynamic data: Local calibration and inference of the structural parameters, SPE paper no. 56556, p. 1-9.
9. Le Ravalec, M., Hu, L. Y., and Nœtinger, B., 2000, Sampling the conditional realization space using the gradual deformation method; Geostatistics (Cape Town), v. 1, p. 176-186.
10. Le Ravalec, M., and Nœtinger, B., 2002, Optimization with the gradual deformation method: Math. Geol., v. 34 no. 2, p. 125-142.
11. Liu, N., and Oliver, D. S., 2003, Evaluation of Monte Carlo methods for assessing uncertainty: SPE J., v. 8, no. 2, p. 1-15.
12. Oliver, D. S., Cunha, L. B., and Reynolds, A. C., 1997, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods for conditioning a permeability field to pressure data: Math. Geol., v. 29, no. 1, p. 61-91.
13. Oliver, D. S., He, N., and Reynolds, A. C., 1996, Conditioning permeability fields to pressure data, in Proc. Eur. Conf. Math. Oil Recov., V (ECMOR V), Leoben, Austria, p. 1-11.
14. Omre, H., 2001, Stochastic reservoir models conditioned to non-linear production history observations, Tech. Rep. Statistics No. 3/2001: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Trondheim, Norway.
15. Roggero, F., and Hu, L. Y., 1998, Gradual deformation of continuous geostatistical models for history matching, SPE paper no. 49004.
16. Skjervheim, J. A., 2002, Gradual deformation: Unpublished class project, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Trondheim, Norway.