A comment on the relation between the propagators of dual theories

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 65, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 760-765

  Baeta Scarpelli A P ^a,c   Cantcheff, M Botta ^b   Helayel Neto J A ^a,b  

^a Grupo de Fisica Teorica Jose Leite Lopes   (Brazil)

^b CENTRO BRASILEIRO DE PESQUISAS FÍSICAS   (Brazil)

^c Instituto Estadual de Florestas   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842615869     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2003-10192-1     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. ANACLETO M. A., ILHA A., NASCIMENTO J. R. S., RIBEIRO R. F. and WOTZASEK C., Phys. Lett. B, 504 (2001) 268.
2. ILHA A. and WOTZASEK C., Nucl. Phys. B, 604 (2001) 426.
3. FREEDMAN DANIEL Z. and VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN P., Phys. Rev. D, 13 (1976) 3214.
4. FERRARA S., FREEDMAN DANIEL Z. and VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN P., Phys. Rev. D, 15 (1977) 1013.
5. FERRARA S. and SCHERK J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 37 (1976) 1035.
6. DESER S. and JACKIW R., Phys. Lett. B, 139 (1984) 2366.
7. For a recent review on application of the master action to provide duality in diverse areas, see HJELMELAND S. E. and LINDSTRÖM U., UIO-PHYS-97-03, May 1997. e-Print Archive: hep-th/9705122.
8. BOTTA CANTCHEFF M., GODINHO C., BAÊTA SCARPELLI A. P. and HELAYEL-NETO J. A., Phys. Rev. D, 68 (2003) 065025.