Where and how does grammatically geared processing take place - And why is Broca's area often involved. A coordinated fMRI/ERBP study of language processing

Brain and Language

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 337-345

  Dogil, Grzegorz ^a   Frese, Inga ^a   Haider, Hubert ^b   Röhm, Dietmar ^b   Wokurek, Wolfgang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

Author keywords

Combined fMRI EEG; Language induced brain dynamics; Phrase structure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DIAGONAL BAND OF BROCA; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EXPERIMENTATION; FEMALE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPREHENSION; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; READING; REGIONAL BLOOD FLOW; SEMANTICS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 1842607065     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00354-7     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackermann, H., & Riecker, A. (this volume). The contribution of the insula to motor aspects of speech production
2. Basar E. Brain functions and oscillations. 1998;Springer, Berlin.
3. Basar E., Basar-Eroglu C., Karakas S., Schürmann M. Are cognitive processes manifested in event-related γ, α, θ and δ oscillations in the EEG? Neuroscience Letters. 259:1999;165-168.
4. Bastiaansen M., Van Berkum J., Hagoort P. Event-related θ responses in the human EEG differentiate between gender and number agreement violations during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters. 323:2002;13-16.
5. Bressler S.L., Kelso S. Cortical coordination dynamics and cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 5:2001;26-36.
6. Cabeza R., Nyberg L. Imaging cognition II: An empirical review of 275 PET and fMRI studies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12:2000;1-47.
7. Caplan D., Alpert N., Waters G., Olivieri A. Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping. 9:2000;65-71.
8. Dapretto M., Bookheimer S.Y. Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron. 24:1999;427-432.
9. Dogil G., Ackermann H., Grodd W., Haider H., Kamp H., Mayer J., Riecker A., Wildgruber D. The speaking brain: A tutorial introduction to fMRI experiments in the production of speech, prosody and syntax. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 15:2002;59-90.
10. Dogil G., Ackermann H., Mayer J., Riecker A., Wildgruber D. Das Sprechnetzwerk im menschlichen Gehirn: Evidenz aus der funktionalen Kernspintomographie und aus der Klinik. Müller H., Rickheit G. Neurokognition der Sprache. 2003;Narr, Tübingen.
11. Dogil G., Haider H., Schaner-Wolles C., Husmann R. Radical autonomy of syntax: Evidence from transcortical sensory aphasia. Aphasiology. 9:1995;577-602.
12. Embick D., Marantz A., Miyashita Y., O'Neil W., Sakai K.L. A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 97(11):2000;6150-6154.
13. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A. Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 30:2001;321-338.
14. Frese, I. (to appear). Neuroanatomical correlates of phrase structure generation (working title). Ph.D. dissertation, IMS, Stuttgart
15. Friederici, A. (2003). The neural basis of sentence processing: A neurocognitive model. Cognition, special issue, Towards a New Functional Anatomy of Language
16. Friederici, A., & Alter, K. (this volume). Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model
17. Friederici A., Wang Y., Herrmann C.-S., Maess B., Oertel U. Localization of early syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study. Human Brain Mapping. 11:2000;1-11.
18. Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of syntax: Language use without Broca's area. Behavioural and Brain Sciences. 23:2000;1-21.
19. Haken H. Principles of brain functioning: A synergetic approach to brain activity, behaviour and cognition. 1996;Springer, Heidelberg/New York.
20. Hauser M., Chomsky N., Fitch W.T. The faculty of language: What it it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science. 298:2002;1569-1579.
21. Hickok G., Poeppel D. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 4:2000;131-138.
22. Indefrey P. Hirnaktivierungen bei syntaktischer Sprachverarbeitung: Eine Meta-Analyse. Müller H., Rickheit G. Neurokognition der Sprache. 2003;Narr, Tübingen.
23. Indefrey P., Brown C.M., Hellwig F., Amunts K., Herzog H., Seitz R.J., Hagoort P. A neural correlates of syntactic encoding during speech production. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 98(10):2001;5933-5936.
24. Indefrey, P., Hellwig, F., Herzog, H., Seitz, R. J., & Hagoort, P. (this volume). Neural responses to the production and comprehension of syntax in identical utterances
25. Kaan E., Swaab T.Y. Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 15:2003;98-110.
26. Klimesch W., Russegger H., Doppelmayr M., Pachinger Th. A method for the calculation of induced band power: Implications for the significance of brain oscillations. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 108:1998;123-130.
27. Kutas M., Hillyard S.A. Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science. 207:1980;203-205.
28. Makeig S., Westerfield M., Jung T.-P., Enghoff S., Townsend J., Courchesne E., Sejnowski T.J. Dynamic brain sources of visual evoked responses. Science. 295:2002;690-694.
29. Marslen-Wilson W., Tyler L.K. Temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition. 8:1980;1-71.
30. Meyer M., Friederici A., Cramon Y. Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cognitive Brain Research. 9:2000;19-33.
31. Müller, R.-A., & Basho, S. (this volume). Are non-linguistic functions in 'Broca's area' prerequisites for language acquisition?
32. Müller R.-A., Kleinhans N., Courchesne E. Linguistic theory and neuroimaging evidence: An fMRI study of Broca's area in lexical semantics. Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;119-1207.
33. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;785-806.
34. Phillips C. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry. 34:2003;1.
35. Pfurtscheller G., Aranibar A. Event-related cortical desynchronization detected by power measurement of scalp EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 42:1977;817-826.
36. Poeppel D. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: Cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Communication. 41:2003;245-255.
37. Röhm D. Gehirnoszillationen und Sprache: EEG- Bandpowerveränderungen bei Sprachverarbeitungsprozessen. Müller H., Rickheit G. Neurokognition der Sprache. 2003;Narr, Tübingen.
38. Röhm D., Klimesch W., Haider H., Doppelmayr M. The role of θ and α oscillations for language comprehension in the human electroencephalogram. Neuroscience Letters. 310:2001;137-140.
39. Sayers B., Beagley H.A., Hanshall W.R. The mechanisms of auditory evoked EEG responses. Nature. 247:1974;481-483.
40. Schack B., Rappelsberger P., Weiss S., Möller E. Adaptive phase estimation and its application in EEG analysis of word processing. Journal of Neuroscience Methods. 93:1999;49-59.
41. Stromswold K., Caplan D., Alpert N., Rauch S. Localization of syntactic comprehension by Position Emission Tomography. Brain and Language. 52:1996;452-473.
42. Wise R., Greene J., Büchel C., Scott S.K. Brain regions involved in articulation. Lancet. 353:1999;1057-1061.