-
1
-
-
0003515394
-
-
London: Academic Press, and, eds
-
Ames, C., and Ames, R., eds. 1984. Research on Motivation in Education, Vol 1, London: Academic Press.
-
(1984)
Research on Motivation in Education
, vol.55
-
-
Ames, C.1
Ames, R.2
-
2
-
-
0003515394
-
-
London: Academic Press, and, eds
-
Ames, C., and Ames, R., eds. 1985. Research on Motivation in Education, Vol 2, London: Academic Press.
-
(1985)
Research on Motivation in Education
, vol.55
-
-
Ames, C.1
Ames, R.2
-
3
-
-
1842544795
-
To test or not to test, that is the question
-
Blyth, C, and Faulkner, J., 1994. ‘To test or not to test, that is the question’. Division of Educational Psychology Newsletter,: 27–36.
-
(1994)
Division of Educational Psychology Newsletter
, pp. 27-36
-
-
Blyth, C.1
Faulkner, J.2
-
4
-
-
84929295077
-
Specific learning difficulties: The specific reading difficulties versus dyslexia controversy resolved?
-
chapter on examination boards complete edition
-
Cornwall, K. E, Hedderly, R., and Pumfrey, P. D., 1984. ‘Specific learning difficulties: the specific reading difficulties versus dyslexia controversy resolved?’. Occasional Papers of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology of the British Psychological Society, 7(3) (chapter on examination boards in complete edition)
-
(1984)
Occasional Papers of the Division of Educational and Child Psychology of the British Psychological Society
, vol.7
, Issue.3
-
-
Cornwall, K.E.1
Hedderly, R.2
Pumfrey, P.D.3
-
7
-
-
0026955007
-
The validity of discrepancy based definitions of reading disabilities
-
Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Rourke, B. P., Shaywitz, S. E., and Shaywitz, B. A., 1992. ‘The validity of discrepancy based definitions of reading disabilities’. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25(9): 555–561.
-
(1992)
Journal of Learning Disabilities
, vol.25
, Issue.9
, pp. 555-561
-
-
Fletcher, J.M.1
Francis, D.J.2
Rourke, B.P.3
Shaywitz, S.E.4
Shaywitz, B.A.5
-
9
-
-
34547412605
-
‘Psychologists’ assessments of specific learning difficulty (dyslexia) and examination boards: Policies and practices
-
Hedderly, R., 1992. ‘Psychologists’ assessments of specific learning difficulty (dyslexia) and examination boards: policies and practices. Educational Psychology in Practice, 6(1): 32–42.
-
(1992)
Educational Psychology in Practice
, vol.6
, Issue.1
, pp. 32-42
-
-
Hedderly, R.1
-
11
-
-
85071219101
-
Specific Learning difficulties: How severe is severe?
-
Windsor: NFER-Nelson,. In
-
McNab, I., 1992. “ ‘Specific Learning difficulties: how severe is severe?’ ”. In Manual for the British Ability Scales Spelling Test, Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
-
(1992)
Manual for the British Ability Scales Spelling Test
-
-
McNab, I.1
-
13
-
-
33745026157
-
-
New York: Hinds, Noble and Eldridge, (original work published 1897
-
Rice, J. M., 1913. Scientific Management in Education, New York: Hinds, Noble and Eldridge. (original work published in 1897)
-
(1913)
Scientific Management in Education
-
-
Rice, J.M.1
-
14
-
-
1842544787
-
On reading and the GCSE
-
Sawyer, C., Ferguson, L., Hayward, M., and Cunningham, L., 1991. ‘On reading and the GCSE’. The Psychologist, 4(5): 221–222.
-
(1991)
The Psychologist
, vol.4
, Issue.5
, pp. 221-222
-
-
Sawyer, C.1
Ferguson, L.2
Hayward, M.3
Cunningham, L.4
-
15
-
-
21344489695
-
How do season of birth and length of schooling affect children's attainment at Key Stage 1?
-
Sharp, C., Hutchison, D., and Whetton, C., 1994. ‘How do season of birth and length of schooling affect children's attainment at Key Stage 1?’. Educational Research, 36(2): 107–121.
-
(1994)
Educational Research
, vol.36
, Issue.2
, pp. 107-121
-
-
Sharp, C.1
Hutchison, D.2
Whetton, C.3
-
18
-
-
84936849467
-
Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray?
-
Stanovitch, K. E., 1991. ‘Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: has intelligence led us astray?’. Reading Research Quarterly, 26: 7–29.
-
(1991)
Reading Research Quarterly
, vol.26
, pp. 7-29
-
-
Stanovitch, K.E.1
-
19
-
-
84982000889
-
A note of caution concerning the Neale Analysis of reading ability (revised)
-
Stothard, S., and Hulme, C., 1991. ‘A note of caution concerning the Neale Analysis of reading ability (revised)’. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61: 226–229.
-
(1991)
British Journal of Educational Psychology
, vol.61
, pp. 226-229
-
-
Stothard, S.1
Hulme, C.2
|