Valla Grammaticus, Agostino Steuco, and the Donation of Constantine

Journal of the History of Ideas

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1996, Pages 55-77

  Delph, Ronald K ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842586814     PISSN: 00225037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3653882     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
2. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
3. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
4. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
5. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
6. For the influence of Quintilian on Valla see Salvatore I. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla: umanesimo e teologia (Florence, 1972), 36-164, 230, and idem, "Lorenzo Valla e il De falso credita donatione," Meworie domenicane, n.s., 19 (1988), 191-293; also Wolfram Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift gegen die Konstantinische Schenkung (Tübingen, 1975), 43-51; Vincenzo De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia nella Declamatio di Lorenzo Valla sulla donazione di Costantino," Paragone, 338 (1978), 36-56; and Carlo Ginzburg's preface to Lorenzo Valla, La Donation de Constantin, tr. Jean-Baptiste Giard (Paris, 1993), ix-xxi. Citations of Valla's treatise are from Lorenzo Valla, De falso credita et ementita Constantini donatione, ed. Wolfram Setz, Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Quellen zur Geistesgeschichte des Mittelalters, X (Weimar, 1976), 55-176.
7. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
8. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
9. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
10. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
11. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
12. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
13. Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, 36-108, and idem, "Valla e il De falso credita donatione," 199-200, 238-44. For Valla's philology in general, see David Marsh, "Grammar, Method, and Polemic in Lorenzo Valla's Elegantiae," Rinascimento, 19 (1979), 91-116. There has been much recent debate concerning Valla as a "language philosopher," in which scholars have assessed Valla's understanding of the relationship between language and culture, verbum et res. For the arguments, see Richard Waswo, Language and Meaning in the Renaissance (Princeton, 1987); and his "Motives of Misreading," in Renaissance Essays II, ed. William J. Connell (Rochester, 1993), 101-9; Maristella Lorch, "Lorenzo Valla," in Renaissance Humanism: Foundations, Forms and Legacy, ed. Albert Rabil, 3 vols. (Philadelphia, 1988), I, 332-49; and John Monfasani, "Was Lorenzo Valla an Ordinary Language Philosopher?" in Renaissance Essays II, ed. Connell, 86-100.
14. See Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, passim; and Donald R. Kelley, Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship (New York, 1970), 21-46.
15. See Camporeale, Lorenzo Valla, passim; and Donald R. Kelley, Foundations of Modern Historical Scholarship (New York, 1970), 21-46.
16. Quoted by Ginzburg in Valla, La Donation de Constantin, x. On Valla's treatise as an oration, see idem, ix-xxi; and De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia," 41-42.
17. Quoted by Ginzburg in Valla, La Donation de Constantin, x. On Valla's treatise as an oration, see idem, ix-xxi; and De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia," 41-42.
18. Quoted by Ginzburg in Valla, La Donation de Constantin, x. On Valla's treatise as an oration, see idem, ix-xxi; and De Caprio, "Retorica e ideologia," 41-42.
19. My thoughts here are shaped by Anthony Grafton, Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, Vols. I and II (Oxford, 1983-93); idem, "Quattrocento Humanism and Classical Scholarship," in Renaissance Humanism, ed. Rabil, III, 23-65; and by John D'Amico, Theory and Practice in Renaissance Textual Criticism. Beatus Rhenanus Between Conjecture and History (Berkeley, 1988).
20. My thoughts here are shaped by Anthony Grafton, Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, Vols. I and II (Oxford, 1983-93); idem, "Quattrocento Humanism and Classical Scholarship," in Renaissance Humanism, ed. Rabil, III, 23-65; and by John D'Amico, Theory and Practice in Renaissance Textual Criticism. Beatus Rhenanus Between Conjecture and History (Berkeley, 1988).
21. My thoughts here are shaped by Anthony Grafton, Joseph Scaliger: A Study in the History of Classical Scholarship, Vols. I and II (Oxford, 1983-93); idem, "Quattrocento Humanism and Classical Scholarship," in Renaissance Humanism, ed. Rabil, III, 23-65; and by John D'Amico, Theory and Practice in Renaissance Textual Criticism. Beatus Rhenanus Between Conjecture and History (Berkeley, 1988).
22. On Steuco see Theobald Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus aus Gubbio, Augusfinerchorherr und päpstlicher Bibliothekar (1497-1548) (Münster in Westfalen, 1935); Mariano Crociata, Umanesimo e teologia in Agostino Steuco. Neoplatonisme e teologia della creazione nel "De perenni philosophia" (Rome, 1987); and Maria Muccillo, "La 'prisca theologia' nel 'De perenni philosophia' di Agostino Steuco," Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41-111. Steuco's Adversus Lutheranos has been analyzed by Silvana Seidel Menchi in her Erasmo in Italia 1520-1580 (Turin, 1987), 41-68, while these two treatises are explored in a broader religious and cultural context in my "From Venetian Visitor to Curial Humanist: The Development of Agostino Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," Renaissance Quarterly, 47 (1994), 102-39.
23. On Steuco see Theobald Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus aus Gubbio, Augusfinerchorherr und päpstlicher Bibliothekar (1497-1548) (Münster in Westfalen, 1935); Mariano Crociata, Umanesimo e teologia in Agostino Steuco. Neoplatonisme e teologia della creazione nel "De perenni philosophia" (Rome, 1987); and Maria Muccillo, "La 'prisca theologia' nel 'De perenni philosophia' di Agostino Steuco," Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41-111. Steuco's Adversus Lutheranos has been analyzed by Silvana Seidel Menchi in her Erasmo in Italia 1520-1580 (Turin, 1987), 41-68, while these two treatises are explored in a broader religious and cultural context in my "From Venetian Visitor to Curial Humanist: The Development of Agostino Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," Renaissance Quarterly, 47 (1994), 102-39.
24. On Steuco see Theobald Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus aus Gubbio, Augusfinerchorherr und päpstlicher Bibliothekar (1497-1548) (Münster in Westfalen, 1935); Mariano Crociata, Umanesimo e teologia in Agostino Steuco. Neoplatonisme e teologia della creazione nel "De perenni philosophia" (Rome, 1987); and Maria Muccillo, "La 'prisca theologia' nel 'De perenni philosophia' di Agostino Steuco," Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41-111. Steuco's Adversus Lutheranos has been analyzed by Silvana Seidel Menchi in her Erasmo in Italia 1520-1580 (Turin, 1987), 41-68, while these two treatises are explored in a broader religious and cultural context in my "From Venetian Visitor to Curial Humanist: The Development of Agostino Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," Renaissance Quarterly, 47 (1994), 102-39.
25. On Steuco see Theobald Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus aus Gubbio, Augusfinerchorherr und päpstlicher Bibliothekar (1497-1548) (Münster in Westfalen, 1935); Mariano Crociata, Umanesimo e teologia in Agostino Steuco. Neoplatonisme e teologia della creazione nel "De perenni philosophia" (Rome, 1987); and Maria Muccillo, "La 'prisca theologia' nel 'De perenni philosophia' di Agostino Steuco," Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41-111. Steuco's Adversus Lutheranos has been analyzed by Silvana Seidel Menchi in her Erasmo in Italia 1520-1580 (Turin, 1987), 41-68, while these two treatises are explored in a broader religious and cultural context in my "From Venetian Visitor to Curial Humanist: The Development of Agostino Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," Renaissance Quarterly, 47 (1994), 102-39.
26. On Steuco see Theobald Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus aus Gubbio, Augusfinerchorherr und päpstlicher Bibliothekar (1497-1548) (Münster in Westfalen, 1935); Mariano Crociata, Umanesimo e teologia in Agostino Steuco. Neoplatonisme e teologia della creazione nel "De perenni philosophia" (Rome, 1987); and Maria Muccillo, "La 'prisca theologia' nel 'De perenni philosophia' di Agostino Steuco," Rinascimento, 28 (1988), 41-111. Steuco's Adversus Lutheranos has been analyzed by Silvana Seidel Menchi in her Erasmo in Italia 1520-1580 (Turin, 1987), 41-68, while these two treatises are explored in a broader religious and cultural context in my "From Venetian Visitor to Curial Humanist: The Development of Agostino Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," Renaissance Quarterly, 47 (1994), 102-39.
27. r.
28. v he wrote, "Scire quoque operae pretium est verba donationis a Laurentio proferri non adhibitis variis exemplaribus, sed quo calumniis suis esset locus, dumtaxat, ut legerat apud Gratianum."
29. For the Donation as it appears in Gratian, consult the Corpus iuris canonici, pars prior Decretum magistri Gratiani, ed. Aemilius Ludwig Richter (Leipzig, 1879). The Donation is at distinctio XCVI, ch. 14, 342-45. Properly speaking, the document is referred to as the Constitutum Constantini. The text as it appeared in Gratian's Decretum began in the middle of the decree with the so-called Donatio. The editor who inserted the decree into the Decretum excerpted only part of the text from the longer, older recension preserved in the Pseudo-Isidorean decretals. For Valla's use of the edict as it appeared in Gratian, see Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift, 39-41. For an analysis of the entire decree and its insertion into Gratian, consult Christopher Coleman, Constantine the Great and Christianity (New York, 1914), 176-78. On the antiquity of the Pseudo-Isidorean recension, see Horst Fuhrmann, Einfluss und Verbreitung pseudoisidorischen Falschungen, Schriften des Monumenta Germaniae Historica, XXIV (Stuttgart, 1972), pt. II, 354-89; also his critical edition of the Donation in Constitutum Constantini, Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi, X (Hanover, 1968), 56-98, citations here by line number.
30. For the Donation as it appears in Gratian, consult the Corpus iuris canonici, pars prior Decretum magistri Gratiani, ed. Aemilius Ludwig Richter (Leipzig, 1879). The Donation is at distinctio XCVI, ch. 14, 342-45. Properly speaking, the document is referred to as the Constitutum Constantini. The text as it appeared in Gratian's Decretum began in the middle of the decree with the so-called Donatio. The editor who inserted the decree into the Decretum excerpted only part of the text from the longer, older recension preserved in the Pseudo-Isidorean decretals. For Valla's use of the edict as it appeared in Gratian, see Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift, 39-41. For an analysis of the entire decree and its insertion into Gratian, consult Christopher Coleman, Constantine the Great and Christianity (New York, 1914), 176-78. On the antiquity of the Pseudo-Isidorean recension, see Horst Fuhrmann, Einfluss und Verbreitung pseudoisidorischen Falschungen, Schriften des Monumenta Germaniae Historica, XXIV (Stuttgart, 1972), pt. II, 354-89; also his critical edition of the Donation in Constitutum Constantini, Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi, X (Hanover, 1968), 56-98, citations here by line number.
31. For the Donation as it appears in Gratian, consult the Corpus iuris canonici, pars prior Decretum magistri Gratiani, ed. Aemilius Ludwig Richter (Leipzig, 1879). The Donation is at distinctio XCVI, ch. 14, 342-45. Properly speaking, the document is referred to as the Constitutum Constantini. The text as it appeared in Gratian's Decretum began in the middle of the decree with the so-called Donatio. The editor who inserted the decree into the Decretum excerpted only part of the text from the longer, older recension preserved in the Pseudo-Isidorean decretals. For Valla's use of the edict as it appeared in Gratian, see Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift, 39-41. For an analysis of the entire decree and its insertion into Gratian, consult Christopher Coleman, Constantine the Great and Christianity (New York, 1914), 176-78. On the antiquity of the Pseudo-Isidorean recension, see Horst Fuhrmann, Einfluss und Verbreitung pseudoisidorischen Falschungen, Schriften des Monumenta Germaniae Historica, XXIV (Stuttgart, 1972), pt. II, 354-89; also his critical edition of the Donation in Constitutum Constantini, Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi, X (Hanover, 1968), 56-98, citations here by line number.
32. For the Donation as it appears in Gratian, consult the Corpus iuris canonici, pars prior Decretum magistri Gratiani, ed. Aemilius Ludwig Richter (Leipzig, 1879). The Donation is at distinctio XCVI, ch. 14, 342-45. Properly speaking, the document is referred to as the Constitutum Constantini. The text as it appeared in Gratian's Decretum began in the middle of the decree with the so-called Donatio. The editor who inserted the decree into the Decretum excerpted only part of the text from the longer, older recension preserved in the Pseudo-Isidorean decretals. For Valla's use of the edict as it appeared in Gratian, see Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift, 39-41. For an analysis of the entire decree and its insertion into Gratian, consult Christopher Coleman, Constantine the Great and Christianity (New York, 1914), 176-78. On the antiquity of the Pseudo-Isidorean recension, see Horst Fuhrmann, Einfluss und Verbreitung pseudoisidorischen Falschungen, Schriften des Monumenta Germaniae Historica, XXIV (Stuttgart, 1972), pt. II, 354-89; also his critical edition of the Donation in Constitutum Constantini, Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi, X (Hanover, 1968), 56-98, citations here by line number.
33. For the Donation as it appears in Gratian, consult the Corpus iuris canonici, pars prior Decretum magistri Gratiani, ed. Aemilius Ludwig Richter (Leipzig, 1879). The Donation is at distinctio XCVI, ch. 14, 342-45. Properly speaking, the document is referred to as the Constitutum Constantini. The text as it appeared in Gratian's Decretum began in the middle of the decree with the so-called Donatio. The editor who inserted the decree into the Decretum excerpted only part of the text from the longer, older recension preserved in the Pseudo-Isidorean decretals. For Valla's use of the edict as it appeared in Gratian, see Setz, Lorenzo Vallas Schrift, 39-41. For an analysis of the entire decree and its insertion into Gratian, consult Christopher Coleman, Constantine the Great and Christianity (New York, 1914), 176-78. On the antiquity of the Pseudo-Isidorean recension, see Horst Fuhrmann, Einfluss und Verbreitung pseudoisidorischen Falschungen, Schriften des Monumenta Germaniae Historica, XXIV (Stuttgart, 1972), pt. II, 354-89; also his critical edition of the Donation in Constitutum Constantini, Fontes iuris Germanici antiqui in usum scholarum ex Monumentis Germaniae Historicis separatim editi, X (Hanover, 1968), 56-98, citations here by line number.
34. I use the term Donatio in this essay to specify the text of the decree, and the terms Donation, edict, decree, and Constitutum Constantini to refer in a more general sense to the Donation of Constantine.
35. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.
36. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.
37. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.
38. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.
39. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.
40. Steuco belonged to the order of Augustinian Canons of the Congregation of San Salvatore, and the monastery of Sant' Antonio in Venice was a member of this Congregation. On this order see Giuseppe Mozzagrungno, Narratio rerum gestarum canonicorum regularium (Venice, 1622). For the monastery and library of Sant' Antonio, consult Antonio Foscari and Manfrede Tafuri, "Sebastiano da Lugano, i Grimani e Jacopo Sansovino. Artisti e committenti nella chiesa di Sant' Antonio di Castello," Arte veneta, 36 (1982), 100-23; Theobald Freudenberger, "Die Bibliothek des Kardinals Domenico Grimani," Historisches Jahrbuch, 56 (1936), 15-45 ; and Giovanni Mercati, Codici Latini Pico Grimant Pio, Studi e testi, LXXV (Vatican City, 1938), 26-28. For Steuco in Venice, see Freudenberger, Augustinus Steuchus, 42-71; and Delph, "Steuco's 'Counter'-Reformation Thought," 104-24.