Outcome measurement in the correction of mandibular asymmetry

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 435-443

  Edler, Raymond ^a,c   Wertheim, David ^b   Greenhill, Darrel ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b KINGSTON UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c KINGSTON HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIGITALIZATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW MALFORMATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANTHROPOMETRY; CEPHALOMETRY; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGERY, ORAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1842583794     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Hewitt A.B. A radiographic study of facial asymmetry. Br J Orthod. 2:1975;37-40.
2. Svanholt P., Solow B. Assessment of midline discrepancies on the posteroanterior cephalometric radiograph. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 25:1977;261-268.
3. Ricketts R.M., Bench R.W., Hilgers J.J., Schulhoff R. An overview of computerized cephalometrics. Am J Orthod. 61:1972;1-28.
4. Grummons D.C., Kappeyne van de Coppello M.A. A frontal asymmetry analysis. J Clin Orthod. 21:1987;448-465.
5. Letzer G.M., Kronman J.H. A posteroanterior cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod. 37:1967;205-211.
6. Shah S.M., Joshi M.R. An assessment of asymmetry in the normal craniofacial complex. Angle Orthod. 48:1978;141-148.
7. Chebib F.S., Chamma A.M. Indices of craniofacial asymmetry. Angle Orthod. 51:1981;214-226.
8. Peck S., Peck L., Kataja M. Skeletal asymmetry in esthetically pleasing faces. Angle Orthod. 61:1991;43-47.
9. Basyouni A.A., Nanda S.K. An atlas of the transverse dimensions of the face. Craniofacial Growth Series. 2000;Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (Mich).
10. Severt T.R., Proffit W.R. Post-surgical stability following correction of severe facial asymmetry. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 12:1997;25-261.
11. Lai W., Yamada K., Hanada K., Ali I., Takagi R., Kobayshi T., et al. Post-operative mandibular stability after orthognathic surgery in patients with mandibular protrusion and mandibular deviation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 17:2002;13-22.
12. Yoshida K., Rivera R.S., Kaneko M., Kurita K. Minimizing displacement of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in asymmetric cases. J Oral Max Surg. 9:2001;15-18.
13. Harada K., Ono J., Okada Y., Nagura H., Enomoto S. Postoperative stability after sagittal split ramusosteotomy with condylar-positioning appliance and screw fixation asymmetric versus symmetric cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 83:1997;532-536.
14. Harada K., Tajima K., Enomoto S. Stability after sagittal split ramus osteotomy without postoperative maxillomandibular fixation in the treatment of prognathic patients with asymmetric mandibles. Clin Orthod Res. 2:1999;27-33.
15. Hay A.D., Ayoub A.F., Moos K.F., Singh G.D. Euclidean distance matrix analysis of surgical changes in pre-pubertical craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted L osteotomy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 37:2000;497-502.
16. Padwa B.L., Mulliken J.B., Maghen A., Kaban L.B. Midfacial growth after costochondral graft construction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 56:1998;122-127.
17. Svensson B., Adell R. Costochondral grafts to replace mandibular condyles in juvenile chronic arthritis patients long-term effects on facial growth. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 26:1998;275-285.
18. Rachmiel A., Manor R., Peled M., Laufer D. Intra oral distraction osteogenesis of the mandible in hemifacial microsomia. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 59:2001;728-733.
19. Marquez I.M., Fish L.C., Stella J.P. Two-year follow-up of distraction osteogensis its effect on mandibular ramus height in hemifacial microsomia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 117:2000;130-139.
20. Tehranchi A., Behnia H. Facial symmetry after distraction osteogenesis and orthodontic therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 120:2001;149-153.
21. Kusnoto B., Figueroa A.A., Polley J.W. A longitudinal three-dimensional evaluation of the growth pattern in hemifacial microsomia treated by mandibular distraction osteogenesis a preliminary report. J Craniofac Surg. 10:1999;480-486.
22. Kearns G.J., Padwa B.L., Mulliken J.B., Keban L.B. Progression of facial asymmetry in hemifacial microsomia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 105:2000;492-498.
23. Athanasiou A.E., Miethke R.R., Van der Meij A.J.W. Random errors in localization of landmarks in ostero-anterior cephalograms. Br J Orthod. 26:1999;273-283.
24. Cook J.T. Asymmetry of the craniofacial skeleton. Br J Orthod. 7:1980;33-38.
25. Mulliken J.B., Ferraro N.F., Vento A.R. A retrospective analysis of growth of the constructed condyle-ramus in children with hemi facial microsomia. Cleft Palate J. 26:1989;312-317.
26. Habets L.L.M.H., Bezuur J.N., Van Ooij C.P., Hansson T.L. The orthopantomogram, an aid in diagnosis of temporomandibular joint problems. 1. The factor of vertical magnification. J Oral Rehab. 14:1987;475-480.
27. Ferrario V.F., Sforza C., Poggio C.E., Tartaglia G. Distance from symmetry a three-dimensional evaluation of facial asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 52:1994;1126-1132.
28. Park Y.C., Burstone C.J. Fallacies of hard tissue standards in treatment planning. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthod. 90:1986;52-62.
29. Behnia H., Motamedi M.H., Tehranchi A. Use of activator appliances in pediatric patients treated with costrochondral grafts for temporomandibular joint ankyosis analysis of 13 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 55:1997;1408-1414.
30. Rubio-Bueno P., Padron A., Villa E., Diaz-Gonzales F.J. Distraction osteogensis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices a report of 8 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 58:2000;593-599.
31. Singh G.D., Hay A.D. Morphometry of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients following an inverted L osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 14:1999;229-235.
32. Z'Graggen M., Schiel H.J., Kunz C., Lambrecht J.D. Three-dimensional cephalometry using individual skeletal laser technology models. Clin Anat. 14:2001;258-268.
33. Cisneros G.J., Kaban L.B. Computerized skeletal scintigraphy for assessment of mandibular asymmetry. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 42:1984;513-520.
34. Roth B.A., Gosain A.K., McCarthy J.G., Stracher M.A., Lefton D.R., Grayson B.H. A CT scan technique for quantitative volumetric assessment of the mandible after distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 99:1997;1237-1247.
35. Perrott D.H., Umeda H., Kaban L.B. Costochondral graft construction/reconstruction of the ramus/condyle unit long-term follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 23:1994;321-328.
36. Farkas L.G., Cheung G. Facial asymmetry in healthy North American caucasians. An anthropometrical study. Angle Orthod. 51:1981;70-77.
37. Landes C.A., Bitsakis J., Diehl T., Bitter K. Introduction of a three-dimensional anthropometry of the viscero cranium. Part I measurement of craniofacial development and establishment of standard values and growth functions. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 30:2002;18-24.
38. Burke P.H. Serial observation of asymmetry in the growing face. Br J Orthod. 19:1992;273-285.
39. Moss J.P., Coombes A.M., Lilley A.D., Campos J. Methods of three-dimensional analysis of patients with asymmetry of the face. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 87:1991;139-149.
40. Ferrario V.F., Svortsa C., Schmitz J., Santorro F. Three-dimensional facial morphometric assessment of soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path Oral Radiol Endod. 88:1999;549-556.
41. Landes C., Zachar R., Diehl T., Kovacs A.F. Introduction of a three-dimensional anthropometry of the viscero cranium. Part II evaluating osseous and soft tissue changes following orthognathic surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 30:2002;25-34.
42. Techalertpaisarn P., Kuroda T. Three-dimensional computer-graphic demonstration of facial soft tissue changes in mandibular prognathic patients after mandibular sagittal ramus osteotomy. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 13:1998;217-225.
43. Nechala P., Mahoney J., Farkas L.G. Digital two-dimensional photogrammetry a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg. 103:1999;1819-1825.
44. Coghlan B.A., Laitung J.K.J., Pigott R.W. A computer-method of measuring nasal symmetry in the cleft lip nose. Br J Plast Surg. 46:1993;13-17.
45. Timoney N., Smith G., Pigott R.W. A 20-year audit of nose-tip symmetry in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 54:2001;294-298.
46. Bengel W. Standardization in dental photography. Int Dent J. 35:1985;210-217.
47. Claman L., Patton D., Rashid R. Standardized portrait photography for dental patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 98:1990;197-205.
48. Edler R. Wertheim D, Greenhill D. Mandibular outline assessment in three groups of orthodontic patients. Eur J Orthod. 24:2002;605-614.
49. Edler R., Wertheim D., Greenhill D. Clinical and computerised assessment of mandibular asymmetry. Eur J Orthod. 23:2001;485-494.
50. Greenhill D., Edler R., Wertheim D., Belsham A., Jones G.A. A system for assessing mandibular outlines. 2000;Institution of Electrical Engineers, International Conference on advances in medical signal and information processing. London.
51. Gonzales RC, Woods RE. Digital image processing. Reading, United Kingdom: Addison Wesley Publishing; 1993
52. Bland J.M., Altman D.G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1:1986;306-310.
53. Edler R, Wertheim D, Greenhill D. Comparison of radiographic and photographic measurement of mandibular asymmetry. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;123:167-74