Coarse-grain replica management strategies for dynamic replication of Web contents

Computer Networks

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 19-34

  Fujita, Norihito ^a   Ishikawa, Yuichi ^a   Iwata, Atsushi ^a   Izmailov, Rauf ^b  

^a NEC CORPORATION   (Japan)

^b NEC LABORATORIES AMERICA   (United States)

Author keywords

Download time; Dynamic replication; Replica management; Scalability; URL rewriting

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; MANAGEMENT; QUALITY OF SERVICE; ROUTERS; SERVERS; TECHNICAL WRITING;

DOWNLOAD TIME; DYNAMIC REPLICATION; REPLICA MANAGEMENT; SCALABILITY; URL REWRITING;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 1842582508     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2004.02.006     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. Barbir et al., Known CN request-routing mechanisms, IETF Internet Draft, draft-ietf-cdi-known-request-routing-03.txt, April 2003.
2. A. Iwata et al., Layer 7 integrated QoS routing architecture for content delivery network, in: Proceedings of the Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference (CNDS), January 2002, pp. 207-213.
3. Rabinovich M. Issues in Web content replication. Data Engineering Bulletin. 21(4):1998;21-29. (Invited Paper).
4. M. Rabinovich et al., A dynamic object replication and migration protocol for an Internet hosting service, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems, May 1999, pp. 101-113.
5. T. Loukopoulos, I. Ahmad, Replicating the contents of a WWW multimedia repository to minimize download time, in: Proceedings of Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS2000), May 2000, pp. 500-505.
6. L. Breslau et al., Web caching and Zipf-like distributions evidence and implications, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM '99, March 1999.
7. V.N. Padmanabhan, L. Qiu, The content and access dynamics of a busy web site: findings and implications, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM 2000, August-September 2000.
8. H. Yu, A. Vahdat, Design and evaluation of a continuous consistency model for replicated services, in: Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, October 2000.
9. Bhide M., et al. Adaptive push-pull desseminating dynamic web data. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 51(6):2002;652-668.
10. S. Jamin et al., Constrained mirror placement on the Internet, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, April 2001.
11. L. Qiu et al., On the placement of web server replicas, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM 2001, April 2001.
12. Kangasharju J., et al. Object replication strategies in content distribution networks. Computer Communications. 25(4):2002;376-383.
13. T. Brisco, DNS support for load balancing, RFC 1794, April 1995.
14. F5 Networks, BIG-IP. Available from 〈 http://www.f5.com/f5products/ bigip/index.html 〉.
15. Cisco Systems, Inc. Cisco DistributedDirector, White Paper. Available from 〈 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/cxsr/dd/tech/dd_wp.htm 〉.
16. Lawrence S., Giles C.L. Accessibility of information on the web. Nature. 400(6740):1999;107-109.
17. B. Krishnamurthy, C.E. Wills, Piggyback server invalidation for proxy cache coherency, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International World Wide Web Conference, April 1998.
18. L. Fan et al., Summary cache: a scalable wide-area web cache sharing protocol, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM '98, February 1998.
19. Turau V. What practices are being adopted on the web? IEEE Computer. 31(5):1998;106-108.
20. F. Douglis et al., Rate of change and other metrics: a live study of the world wide web, in: Proceedings the USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, December 1997, pp. 147-158.
21. The Network Simulator - ns-2. Available from 〈 http://www.isi.edu/ nsnam/ns/index.html 〉.
22. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, The Internet Traffic Archive. Available from 〈 http://ita.ee.lbl.gov/ 〉.
23. D. Cavin et al., On the accuracy of MANET simulators, in: Proceedings of the Workshop on Principles of Mobile Computing (POMC'02), ACM, October 2002.