The effect of reinforcement with woven E-glass fibers on the impact strength of complete dentures fabricated with high-impact acrylic resin

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 274-280

  Kim, Sung Hun ^a,c   Watts, David C ^b  

^a Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c Mokdong Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; GLASS FIBER;

ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; FRACTURE; HUMAN; MAXILLA; MEASUREMENT; OCCLUSION; POLYMERIZATION; REINFORCEMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE BASES; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, COMPLETE, UPPER; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; WATER;

EID: 1842580047     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.12.023     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Gutteridge D.L. The effect of including ultra-high modulus polyethylene fiber on the impact strength of acrylic resin. Br Dent J. 164:1988;177-180.
2. Johnston E.P., Nicholls J.I., Smith D.E. Flexural fatigue of 10 commonly used denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent. 46:1981;478-483.
3. Manley T.R., Bowman A.J., Cook M. Denture bases reinforced with carbon fibress. Br Dent J. 146:1979;25.
4. Lambrecht J.R., Kydd W.L. A functional stress analysis of the maxillary complete denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 12:1962;865-872.
5. Hargreaves A.S. The prevalence of fractured dentures. A survey. Br Dent J. 126:1969;451-455.
6. Smith D.C. Acrylic denture. Mechanical evaluation; mid-line fracture. Br Dent J. 110:1961;257-267.
7. Dabbar U.R., Huggett R., Harrison A. Denture fracture - survey. Br Dent J. 176:1994;342-345.
8. Carroll C.E., von Fraunhofer J.A. Wire reinforcement of acrylic resin prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 52:1984;639-641.
9. Ruffino A.R. Effect of steel strengtheners on fracture resistance of the acrylic resin complete denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 54:1985;75-78.
10. Vallittu P.K., Lassila V.P. Effect of metal strengthener's surface roughness on fracture resistance of acrylic denture base material. J Oral Rehabil. 19:1992;385-391.
11. Vallittu P.K. Effect of some properties metal strengtheners on the fracture resistance of acrylic denture base material construction. J Oral Rehabil. 20:1993;241-248.
12. Hero H., Ruyter I.E., Waarli M.L., Hultquist G. Adhesion of resins to Ag-Pd alloys by means of the silicoating technique. J Dent Res. 66:1987;1380-1385.
13. Naegeli D.G., Duke E.S., Schwartz R., Norling B.K. Adhesive bonding of composites to a casting alloy. J Prosthet Dent. 60:1988;279-283.
14. Vallittu P.K. Dimensional accuracy and stability of polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with metal wire or with continuous glass fiber. J Prosthet Dent. 75:1996;617-621.
15. Robinson, McCabe J.F. Impact strength of acrylic resin denture base materials with surface defects. Dent Mater. 9:1993;355-360.
16. Matsukawa S., Hayakawa T., Nemoto K. Development of high-toughness resin for dental applications. Dent Mater. 10:1994;343-346.
17. Jagger D.C., Harrison A., Jandt K.D. Review. The reinforcement of dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 26:1999;185-194.
18. Schreiber C.K. Polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with carbon fibers. Br Dent J. 130:1971;29-30.
19. Bowman A.J., Manley T.R. The elimination of breakages in upper dentures by reinforcement with carbon fibres. Br Dent J. 156:1984;87-89.
20. Yazdanie N., Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: an investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent. 54:1985;543-547.
21. Grant A.A., Greener E.H. Whisker reinforcement of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resins. Aust Dent J. 12:1967;29-33.
22. Berrong J.M., Weed R.M., Young J.M. Fracture resistance of Kevlar-reinforced poly(methyl methacrylate) resin. a preliminary study. Int J Prosthodont. 3:1990;391-395.
23. Dixon D.L., Breeding L.C. The transverse strengths of three denture base resins reinforced with polyethylene fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 67:1992;417-419.
24. Vallittu P.K. Flexural properties of acrylic resin polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;318-326.
25. Vallittu P.K. Some aspects of the tensile strength of unidirectional glass fiber-polymethyl methacrylate composite used in dentures. J Oral Rehabil. 25:1998;100-105.
26. Uzun G., Hersek N., Tincer T. Effect of five woven fiber reinforcements on the impact and transverse strength of a denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 81:1999;616-620.
27. Braden M., Davy K.W., Parker S., Ladizesky N.H., Ward I.M. Denture base poly(methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-thin modulus polyethylene fibers. Br Dent J. 164:1988;109-113.
28. Vallittu P.K., Narva K. Impact strength of a modified continuous glass fiber-polymethyl methacrylate. Int J Prosthodont. 10:1997;142-148.
29. Chen S.Y., Liang W.M., Yen P.S. Reinforcement of acrylic denture base resin by incorporation of various fibers. J Biomed Mater Res. 58:2001;203-208.
30. Vallittu P.K., Vojtkova H., Lassila V.P. Impact strength of denture polymethyl methacrylate reinforced with continuous glass fibers or metal wire. Acta Odontol Scand. 53:1995;392-396.
31. Carlos N.B., Harrison A. The effect of untreated UHMWPE beads on some properties of acrylic resin denture base material. J Dent. 25:1997;59-64.
32. Ward I.M., Hadley D.W. An introduction to the mechanical properties of solid polymers. 1993;John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis. p. 276-81.
33. Turner S. Mechanical testing of plastics. 2nd ed. 1987;John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis. p. 139-53.
34. Niesen L.E., Landel R.F. Mechanical properties of polymers and composite. 2nd ed. 1993;Marcel Dekker, New York. p. 307-17.
35. Halliday D., Resnick R., Walker J. Fundamentals of physics. 6th ed. 2001;John Wiley & Sons, Indianapolis. p.144.
36. Dodson B. Weibull analysis. 1994;American Society for Quality, Milwaukee (WI). p. 1-13.
37. Hull D., Clyne T.W. An introduction to composite materials. 2nd ed. 1996;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. p. 60-77.