What impact, if any, has feminism had on science?

Journal of Biosciences

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 7-13

  Keller, Evelyn Fox ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEMINISM;

DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; ETHICS; FERTILIZATION; HUMAN RIGHTS; PHILOSOPHY; POLITICS; REVIEW; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIOLOGY;

EID: 1842579057     PISSN: 02505991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02702556     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Alberts B, Bray D, Lewis J, Raff M, Roberts K and Watson J D 1990 Molecular biology of the cell (New York: Garland Press)
2. Ashburner M 1993 The development of Drosophila melanogaster (New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press)
3. Baltzer F 1967 Theodor Boveri (Translated by Dorthea Rudnick) (Berkeley: University of California Press)
4. Birkhead T R 1996 In it for the eggs; Science 273 273
5. Gender and Biology Study Group 1987 The importance of feminist critique for contemporary cell biology; in Feminism and Science (ed.) Nancy Tauna (Bloomington: Indiana University Press) pp 172-187
6. Gosden R 1996 The Vocabulary of the Egg; Nature (London) 283 485-486
7. Haecker V 1926 Phanögenetisch gerichtete Bestrebungen in Amerika [Phenogenetic Directed Efforts in America]; Z. Indukt Abst. Vererb. 41 232-238
8. Hollway W 1989 Subjectivity and method in psychology: Gender, meaning, and science (London: Sage Publications)
9. Keller E F 1985 Reflections on gender and science (New Heaven: Yale University Press)
10. Keller E F 1990 Gender and Science: 1990; in Great ideas today (Encyclopedia Brittanica)
11. Keller E F 1995 Refiguring life: Metaphors of twentieth century biology (New York: Columbia University Press)
12. Keller E F 1996 Drosophila Embryos as Transitional Objects: The Work of Donald Poulson and Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard; Hist. Stud. Phys. Biol. Sci. 26 313-346
13. Keller E F 2001 Making a Difference: Feminist Movement and Feminist critiques of Science; in Feminism in twentieth century science, technology, and medicine (eds) A Creager, E Lunbeck and L Schiebinger (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)
14. Longino H 1996 Cognitive and non-cognitive values in science: Rethinking the Dichotomy; in Feminism and philosophy of science (eds) L H Nelson and J Nelson (Dordrecht: Kluwer)
15. Martin E 1991 The Egg and the Sperm: How Science Has Constructed a Romance Based on Stereotypical Male-Female Roles; Signs 16 4485-4501
16. Mousseau T A and Charles W F 1998 The adaptive significance of maternal effects; TREE 13 403-407
17. Muller H J 1929 The Gene as the Basis of Life; International Congress of Plant Sciences, Section of Genetics, Symposium on "The Gene", Ithaca, New York, 19 August 1926 (published in Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Science, I, pp 897-921, 1929)
18. Muller H J 1929 The Gene as the Basis of Life; International Congress of Plant Sciences, Section of Genetics, Symposium on "The Gene", Ithaca, New York, 19 August 1926 (published in Proceedings of the International Congress of Plant Science, I, pp 897-921, 1929)
19. Nijhout H F 1990 Metaphors and the Role of Genes in Development; Bioessays 12 441-446
20. Pennisi E 1996 A New Look at Maternal Guidance; Science 273 1334-1336
21. Sander K 1986 The role of genes in ontogenesis; in History of embryology (eds) T J Herder, J A Witkowski and C C Wylie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp 363-395
22. Schatten G and Schatten H 1983 The Energetic Egg; Science 23 28-34
23. Sturtevant A H 1932 The Use of Mosaics in the Study of the Developmental Effects of Genes; Proceedings of the Sixth International Congress of Genetics, p. 304
24. Thomas P 2004 DNA as Data; Harvard Magazine 45-48
25. Tuana N (ed.) 1987 Feminism and science (Bloomington: Indiana University Press)
26. Wade M 1998 The evolutionary genetics of maternal effects; in Maternal effects as adaptations (eds) Mousseau and Fox (Oxford: Oxford University Press) pp 307-322