Welfare effects of fishery policies: Native American treaty rights and recreational salmon fishing

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 263-276

  Lin, Pei Chien ^a   Adams, Richard M ^a   Berrens, Robert P ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Random utility model; Recreation; Salmon; Treaty rights

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842565044     PISSN: 10685502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andrews, E. J., and J. E. Wilen. "Angler Response to Success in the California Salmon Sport Fishery: Evidence and Management Implications." Marine Resour. Econ. 5(1988):125-38.
2. Bennett, D. E. 1988 Willamette River Spring Chinook Salmon Run. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Columbia River Management, Portland OR, 1989.
3. Bennett, D. E., and C. A. Foster. 1992 Willamette River Spring Chinook Salmon Run, Fisheries, and Passage at Willamette Falls. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, Fish Division, Columbia River Management, Portland OR, 1993.
4. Berrens, R., O. Bergland, and R. M. Adams. "Valuation Issues in an Urban Recreational Fishery: Spring Chinook Salmon in Portland, Oregon." J. Leisure Res. 25(1993):70-83.
5. Bockstael, N. E., K. E. McConnell, and I. E. Strand. "Recreation." In Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, eds., J.B. Braden and C.D. Kolstead, pp. 227-68. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press, 1991.
6. Carter, C. N., and H. D. Radtke. "Selected Economic Aspects of the Commercial/Recreational Allocation of Willamette River Spring Chinook." Staff Rep. Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Portland OR, 1986.
7. Cesario, F. J. "Congestion and the Value of Recreation Benefits." Land Econ. 56(1980):329-38.
8. "Chinook Runs to Be Reclassified as Endangered." The Oregonian (Portland OR), 17 August 1994.
9. Coyne, A. G., and W. L. Adamowicz. "Modeling Choice of Site for Hunting Bighorn Sheep." Wildlife Society Bulletin 20(1992):26-33.
10. Davis, S. W., and H. D. Radtke. "Final Report: Survey and Economic Impact Analysis of the 1988 Willamette Run Spring Chinook Sports Fishery." The Research Group, Oregon Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Corvallis OR, 1989.
11. Deyak, S. W., and V. Smith. "Congestion and Participation in Outdoor Recreation: A Household Production Function Approach." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 5(1978):63-80.
12. Englin, J., P. C. Boxall, K. Chakraborty, and D. O. Watson. "Valuing the Impact of Forest Fires on Backcountry Forest Recreation. Forest Sci. 42,4(November 1996):1-6.
13. Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1993.
14. Hanemann, W. M. "Applied Welfare Analysis with Qualitative Response Models." Work. Pap. No. 241, California Agr. Exp. Pap., University of California, Berkeley, 1982.
15. Hausman, J. A., and D. McFadden. "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit Model." Econometrica 52(1984):1219-239.
16. Hellerstein, D., and R. Mendelsohn. "A Theoretical Foundation for Count Data Models, with an Application to a Travel Cost Model." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 75(1993):604-11.
17. Hensher, D. Simultaneous Estimation of Hierarchical Logit Mode Choice Models. Work. Pap. No. 24, MacQuarie University School of Economic and Financial Studies, New South Wales, Australia, 1986.
18. Kaoru, Y., V. K. Smith, and J. L. Liu. "Using Random Utility Models to Estimate the Recreational Value of Estuarine Resources." Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 77(1994):141-51.
19. Loomis, J. "Four Models for Determining Environmental Quality Effects on Recreational Demand and Regional Economics." Ecological Econ. 12(1995):55-68.
20. Maddala, G. S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
21. McConnell, K. E. "Heterogeneous Preferences for Congestion. J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 15(1988): 251-58.
22. McFadden, D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed., P. Zarembka, pp. 105-42. New York: Academic Press, 1974.
23. Morey, E. R. "What Is Consumer Surplus per Day of Use, When Is It a Constant Independent of the Number of Days of Use, and What Does It Tell Us about Consumer Surplus?" J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 26(1994):257-70.
24. Morey, E. R., R. D. Rowe, and W. D. Shaw. "A Discrete-Choice Model of Recreational Participation, Site Choice, and Activity Valuation When Complete Trip Data Are Not Available." J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 20(1991):181-201.
25. Yen, S. T., and W. L. Adamowicz. "Participation, Trip frequency and Site Choice: A Multinomial-Poisson Hurdle Model of Recreation Demand." Can. J. Agr. Econ. 42(1994):65-76.