Regional repositories, reintermediation and the new GMS contract: Cardiovascular disease in Tayside

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 215-221

  Sullivan, Frank M ^a   McEwan, Neil ^b   Murphy, Gavin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^b NINEWELLS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Computerised medical records; Coronary heart disease; Data quality; General practice; Quality improvement

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CALCULATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CONSULTATION; CONTRACT; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM; VALIDATION PROCESS; ARTICLE; DATA BASE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT; MEDICAL RECORD; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES; FAMILY PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MEDICAL RECORDS, PROBLEM-ORIENTED; PATIENT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS; SCOTLAND; STATE MEDICINE; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 1842563176     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v11i4.572     Document Type: Review

References (23)

1. General Practitioner Committee of the British Medical Association. Your Contract, Your Future: general practice contract and explanatory notes from the GPC. London: British Medical Association, 2002.www. nhsconfed.org/gmscontract/docs/gms∠nexeA.doc (accessed 24/07/03).
2. Information and Statistics Division ISD Scotland Guide: an A-Z of the work of the Information and Statistics Division. Edinburgh: Information and Statistics Division, 1996.
3. Evans JMM, McDevitt DG and MacDonald TM. The Tayside Medicines Monitoring Unit (MEMO): a record-linkage system for pharmaco-vigilance. Pharmaceutical Medicine 1995;9:177-84.
4. Department of Health, Scottish Executive. Introduction of managed clinical networks within the NHS in Scotland: 9-2-1999. www.show.scot.nhs.uk/sehd/mels/1999_10.htm (accessed 24/07/03).
5. Baker CD and Lorimer AR. Cardiology: the development of a managed clinical network. British Medical Journal 2000;321:1152-3.
6. SCIMP homepage: www.ceppc.org/scimp/index.shtml (accessed 24/07/03).
7. Morris L, Dumville J, Campbell LM and Sullivan F. A survey of computer use in Scottish primary care: general practitioners are no longer technophobic but other primary care staff need better computer access. Informatics in Primary Care 2003;11:5-11.
8. Framework for Information Management & Technology in the National Health Service in Scotland: taking action 1998-2002. www.show.scot.nhs.uk/imt/ (accessed 24/07/03).
9. www.show.scot.nhs.uk/ecci/ecci00.htm (accessed 24/07/003).
10. Morris AD, Boyle DI, MacAlpine R et al. The Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) Study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO collaboration. British Medical Journal 1997;315:524-8.
11. www.diabetes-healthnet.ac.uk/ (accessed 23/07/03).
12. Sullivan F, Pringle SD, Dougall H et al. The HEARTS collaboration: delivering improved secondary prevention of CHD for patients with heart disease. British Journal of Cardiology 2002;9:634-8.
13. Detmer DE. Building the national health information infrastructure for personal health, health care services, public health, and research. BioMedCentral Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2003;3:1. www. biomedcentral.com/1472-6947/3/1 (accessed 24/07/03).
14. Gray J, Majeed A, Kerry S and Rowlands G. Identifying patients with ischaemic heart disease in general practice: cross-sectional study of paper and computerized medical records. British Medical Journal 2000;321:548-50.
15. Boyle D, Cunningham S, Sullivan F and Morris A. Technology integration for the provision of population-based equitable patient care: the Tayside Regional Diabetes Network - a brief description. Diabetes Nutrition and Metabolism 2001;4(2):15-18.
16. Caldicott Committee. Report on the Review of Patient-identifiable Information. London: Department of Health, 1997. www.doh.gov.uk/nhsexipu/resource/caldico/index. htm (accessed 24/07/03).
17. Al-Shahi R and Warlow C. Using patient-identifiable data for observational research and audit. British Medical Journal 2000;321:1031-2.
18. www.show.scot.nhs.uk/csags (accessed 24/07/03).
19. NHS Executive. NHS Performance Indicators July 2000. Annex A: standardisation methodology. Leeds: NHS Executive, 2000. Available from www.doh.gov.uk/ nhsperformanceindicators/hlpi2000/tech§and.html (accessed 24/07/03).
20. Marshall M and Davies H. Public release of information on quality of care: how are health services and the public expected to respond? Journal of Health Services and Research Policy 2001;6:158-62.
21. Gosden T, Forland F, Kristiansen IS et al. Impact of payment method on behaviour of primary care physicians: a systematic review. Journal of Health Services and Research Policy 2001;6:44-55
22. Hofer TP, Hayward RA, Greenfield S, Wagner EH, Kaplan SH and Manning WG. The unreliability of individual physician 'report cards' for assessing the costs and quality of care of a chronic disease. Journal of the American Medical Association 1999;281:2098-105.
23. Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, Dasse P et al. Obstacles to collaborative quality improvement: the case of ambulatory general medical care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2000;12:115-23.