Empirical and legal perspectives on the impact of pretrial publicity: Effects and remedies

Law and Human Behavior

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 1-2

  Fulero, Solomon M ^a  

^a Sinclair College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COURT; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; EDITORIAL; HUMAN; INTERNET; LEGAL ASPECT; MASS MEDIUM; PUBLIC OPINION;

EID: 1842561667     PISSN: 01477307     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1013848407173     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Carroll, J. S., Kerr, N. L., Alfini, J. J., Weaver, F. M., MacCoun, R. J., & Feldman, V. (1986). Free press and fair trial: The role of behavioral research. Law and Human Behavior, 10, 187-201.
2. Fulero, S. (1987). The role of behavioral research in the free press/ fair trial controversy: Another view. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 259-264.
3. Linz, D., & Penrod, S. (1992). Exploring the First and Sixth Amendments: Pretrial publicity and jury decision making. In D. K. Kagehiro & W. S. Laufer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology and law (pp. 1-20). New York: Springer.
4. Note (1846). Trial by jury in New York. Law Reports, 9, 193-201.
5. Steblay, N. M., Besirevic, J., Fulero, S. M., & Jimenez-Lorente, B. (1999). The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 219-235.