Auditory-Perceptual Scaling and Quality of Life in Tracheoesophageal Speakers

Laryngoscope

Volumn 114, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 753-759

  Eadie, Tanya L ^a   Doyle, Philip C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Auditory perceptual evaluation; Head and Neck Quality of Life instrument; Laryngeal cancer; Tracheoesophageal speech

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY SYSTEM; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EATING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HEAD AND NECK CANCER; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LARYNGECTOMY; LARYNX CANCER; MALE; PAIN; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL SPEECH; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH, ESOPHAGEAL; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA;

EID: 1842557897     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200404000-00030     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Terrell JE, Fisher SG, Wolf GT. Long-term quality of life after treatment of laryngeal cancer: the Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:964-971.
2. Singer MI, Blom ED. An endoscopic technique for restoration of voice after laryngectomy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89:529-533.
3. Hillman RE, Walsh MJ, Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK. Functional outcomes following treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1998;107:2-27.
4. Tardy-Mitzell S, Andrews M, Bowman SA. Acceptability and intelligibility of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol 1985;111:212-215.
5. Finizia C, Hammerlid E, Westin T, Lindström J. Quality of life and voice in patients with laryngeal carcinoma: a post-treatment comparison of laryngectomy (salvage surgery) versus radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1566-1573.
6. Blood GW, Luther AR, Stemple JC. Coping and adjustment in alaryngeal speakers. Am J Clin Speech Lang Pathol 1992; 1:63-69.
7. Mohide EA, Archibald SD, Tew M, Young JE, Haines T. Postlaryngectomy quality-of-life dimensions identified by patients and health care professionals. Am J Surg 1992; 164:619-622.
8. Carr MM, Schmidbauer JA, Majaess L, Smith RL. Communication after laryngectomy: an assessment of quality of life. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;122:39-43.
9. Finizia C, Bergman B. Health-related quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer: a post-treatment comparison of different modes of communication. Laryngoscope 2001; 111:918-923.
10. Terrell J, Nanavati K, Esclamado R, Bishop J, Bradford C, Wolf G. Head and neck cancer-specific quality of life: instrument validation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997;123:1125-1132.
11. Fairbanks G. Voice and Articulation Drillbook, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1960.
12. Eadie TL, Doyle PC. DME and EAI scaling of severity and naturalness in tracheoesophageal (TE) speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002;45:1088-1096.
13. Deleted in proof.
14. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-428.
15. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures: 2003. Atlanta, GA, 2003.
16. Graham MS, Palmer AD. Gender difference considerations for individuals with laryngectomies. Contemp Issues Commun Sci Dis 2002;29:59-67.
17. Slavin DC, Ferrand CT. Factor analysis of proficient esophageal speech: toward a multidimensional model. J Speech Hear Res 1995;38:1224-1231.
18. Mathieson CM, Stam HJ, Scott JP. Psychosocial adjustment after laryngectomy: a review of the literature. J Otolaryngol 1990;19:331-336.
19. Gritz ER, Carmack CL, de Moor C, et al. First year after head and neck cancer: quality of life. J Clin Oncol 1999;17: 352-360.