The quantitative assessment of domino effect caused by overpressure: Part II. Case studies

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 107, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 81-94

  Cozzani, Valerio ^a   Salzano, Ernesto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Blast wave; Domino effect; Explosion; Probit analysis; Quantitative risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; PETROLEUM REFINING; PRESSURE EFFECTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

DOMINO EFFECT; OIL REFINERY; SOCIETAL RISK;

HAZARDOUS MATERIALS;

OIL;

CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; EXPLOSION; PROCESS INDUSTRY;

ACCIDENT; ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; ASSAY; CASE STUDY; HYPERBARISM; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIETY;

ACCIDENTS, OCCUPATIONAL; CHEMICAL INDUSTRY; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; EXPLOSIONS; FUEL OILS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRESSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 1842557649     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2003.09.014     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. F.P. Lees, Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, second ed., Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1996.
2. K. Rasmussen, The experience with the major accident reporting system from 1984 to 1993, EUR 16341 EN, Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 1996.
3. CCPS, Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, second ed., AIChE, New York, 2000.
4. Pettitt G.N., Schumacher R.R., Seeley L.A. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 6:1993;37.
5. S. Contini, S. Boy, M. Atkinson, N. Labath, M. Banca, J.P. Nordvik, Proceedings of European Seminar on Domino Effects, Leuven, 1996, p. 1.
6. V. Cozzani, E. Salzano, The quantitative assessment of domino effects caused by overpressure. Part I. Probit Models, J. Hazard. Mater. 107 (2004) 67.
7. Spadoni G., Egidi D., Contini S. J. Hazard. Mater. 71:2000;423.
8. V. Cozzani, S. Zanelli, Proceedings of 10th International. Symposium. on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2001, p. 1263.
9. C. Delvosalle, Proceedings of European Seminar on Domino Effects, Leuven, 1996, p. 11.
10. Kourniotis S.P., Kiranoudis C.T., Markatos N.C. J. Hazard. Mater. 71:2000;239-252.
11. P.A.M. Uijt de Haag, B.J.M. Ale, Guidelines for Quantitative Risk Assessment (Purple Book), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, NL, 1999.
12. C.J.H. Van Den Bosh, R.A.P.M. Weterings, Methods for the Calculation of Physical Effects (Yellow Book), Committee for the Prevention of Disasters, The Hague, NL, 1997.
13. Egidi D., Foraboschi F.P., Spadoni G., Amendola A. Reliabil. Eng. Syst. Safety. 49:1995;75.
14. Bagster D.F., Pitblado R.M. Process Safety Environ. Protect. 69:1991;196.
15. N.A. Eisenberg, C.J. Lynch, R.J. Breeding, Vulnerability Model: A Simulation System for Assessing Damage Resulting from Marine Spills, Report CG-D-136-75, Enviro Control Inc., Rockville, MD, 1975.
16. Khan F.I., Abbasi S.A. Process Safety Progr. 17:1998;107.
17. J. Gledhill, I. Lines, Development of Methods to Assess the Significance of Domino Effects From Major Hazard Sites, CR Report 183, Health and Safety Executive, 1998.
18. G. Ballocco, A. Carpignano, G. Di Figlia, J.P. Nordvik, L. Rizzuti, Proceedings of European Conference on Safety and Reliability, ESREL, Torino, 2001, p. 2029.
19. Hirst I.L., Carter D.A. J. Hazard. Mater. 92:2002;223.