Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism

Circulation

Volumn 109, Issue 12 SUPPL., 2004, Pages

  Kanne, Jeffrey P ^a   Lalani, Tasneem A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Imaging; MRI; Pulmonary heart disease; Thrombosis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LEG PHLEBOGRAPHY; LUNG ANGIOGRAPHY; LUNG BLOOD VESSEL; LUNG EMBOLISM; LUNG VENTILATION PERFUSION RATIO; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCINTIGRAPHY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; TECHNOLOGY; ANGIOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PULMONARY ARTERY; RADIOGRAPHY; VEIN THROMBOSIS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHLEBOGRAPHY; PULMONARY ARTERY; PULMONARY EMBOLISM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 1842531849     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Ghaye B, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M. Non-traumatic thoracic emergencies: CT diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism: the first 10 years. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1886-1905.
2. Remy-Jardin M, Mastora I, Remy J. Pulmonary embolus imaging with multislice CT. Radiol Clin North Am. 2003;41:507-519.
3. Powell T, Müller NL. Imaging of acute pulmonary thromboembolism: should spiral computed tomography replace the ventilation-perfusion scan? Clin Chest Med. 2003;24:29-38.
4. Johnson MS. Current strategies for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:13-23.
5. Blachere H, Latrabe V, Montaudon M, et al. Pulmonary embolism revealed on helical CT angiography: comparison with ventilation-perfusion radionuclide lung scanning. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1041-1047.
6. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Baghaie F, et al. Clinical value of thin collimation in the diagnostic workup of pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:407-411.
7. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990;263:2753-2759.
8. Garg K, Welsh CH, Feyerabend AJ, et al. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with spiral CT and ventilation-perfusion scanning-correlation with pulmonary angiographic results or clinical outcome. Radiology. 1998;208:201-208.
9. Ferretti GR, Bosson JL, Buffaz PD, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: role of helical CT in 164 patients with intermediate probability at ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy and normal results at duplex US of the legs. Radiology. 1997;205:453-458.
10. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Deschildre F, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with spiral CT: comparison with pulmonary angiography and scintigraphy. Radiology. 1996;200:699-706.
11. van Rossum AB, Treurniet FE, Kieft GJ, et al. Role of spiral volumetric computed tomographic scanning in the assessment of patients with clinical suspicion of pulmonary embolism and an abnormal ventilation/perfusion lung scan. Thorax. 1996;51:23-28.
12. Mayo JR, Remy-Jardin M, Müller NL, et al. Pulmonary embolism: prospective comparison of spiral CT with ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy. Radiology. 1997;205:447-452.
13. Cross JJ, Kemp PM, Walsh CG, et al. A randomized trial of spiral CT and ventilation perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Clin Radiol. 1998;53:177-182.
14. Blum AG, Delfau F, Grignon B, et al. Spiral-computed tomography versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of acute massive pulmonary embolism. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:96-98.
15. Goodman LR, Curtin JJ, Mewissen MW, et al. Detection of pulmonary embolism in patients with unresolved clinical and scintigraphic diagnosis: helical CT versus angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:1369-1374.
16. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Vieillard-Baron A, et al. New CT index to quantify arterial obstruction in pulmonary embolism: comparison with angiographic index and echocardiography. Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1415-1420.
17. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Thelen M. Update on diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:262-275.
18. Stein PD, Henry JW, Gottschalk A. Reassessment of pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: relation of interpreter agreement to the order of the involved pulmonary arterial branch. Radiology. 1999;210:689-691.
19. Diffin DC, Leyendecker JR, Johnson SP, et al. Effect of anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli on interobserver agreement in the interpretation of pulmonary angiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171:1085-1089.
20. Oser RF, Zuckerman DA, Gutierrez FR, et al. Anatomic distribution of pulmonary emboli at pulmonary angiography: implications for cross-sectional imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:31-35.
21. Bynum LJ, Wilson JE3rd, Christensen EE et al. Radiographic techniques for balloon-occlusion pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 1979;133:518-520.
22. Ferris EJ, Holder JC, Lim WN, et al. Angiography of pulmonary emboli: digital studies and balloon-occlusion cineangiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1984;142:369-373.
23. Quinn MF, Lundell CJ, Klotz TA, et al. Reliability of selective pulmonary arteriography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;149:469-471.
24. Stein PD, Athanasoulis C, Alavi A, et al. Complications and validity of pulmonary angiography in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation. 1992;85:462-468.
25. Baile EM, King GG, Müller NL, et al. Spiral computed tomography is comparable to angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1010-1015.
26. Ryu JH, Swensen SJ, Olson EJ, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with use of computed tomographic angiography. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:59-65.
27. Hirsh J. Low-molecular-weight heparin: a review of the results of recent studies of the treatment of venous thromboembolism and unstable angina. Circulation. 1998;98:1575-1582.
28. Carson JL, Kelley MA, Duff A, et al. The clinical course of pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1240-1245.
29. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF 2nd, Ryu JH et al. Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:130-138.
30. Remy-Jardin M, Tillie-Leblond I, Szapiro D, et al. CT angiography of pulmonary embolism in patients with underlying respiratory disease: impact of multislice CT on image quality and negative predictive value. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1971-1978.
31. Krestan CR, Klein N, Kreuzer S, et al. Value of a negative spiral-CT angiography in patients with suspected acute PE: retrospective analysis of PE recurrence and outcom. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(suppl):200.
32. Garg K, Sieler H, Welsh CH, et al. Clinical validity of helical CT being interpreted as negative for pulmonary embolism: implications for patient treatment. Am J Roentgenol. 1999;172:1627-1631.
33. Lomis NN, Yoon HC, Moran AG, et al. Clinical outcomes of patients after a negative spiral CT pulmonary arteriogram in the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:707-712.
34. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, et al. Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram-prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology. 2000;215:535-542.
35. Gottsater A, Berg A, Centergard J, et al. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol. 2001;11:65-72.
36. Ost D, Rozenshtein A, Saffran L, et al. The negative predictive value of spiral computed tomography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in patients with nondiagnostic ventilation-perfusion scans. Am J Med. 2001;110:16-21.
37. Tillie-Leblond I, Mastora I, Radenne F, et al. Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology. 2002;223:461-467.
38. Bourriot K, Couffinhal T, Bernard V, et al. Clinical outcome after a negative spiral CT pulmonary angiographic finding in an inpatient population from cardiology and pneumology wards. Chest. 2003;123:359-365.
39. van Beek EJ, Reekers JA, Batchelor DA, et al. Feasibility, safety and clinical utility of angiography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 1996;6:415-419.
40. Cheely R, McCartney WH, Perry JR, et al. The role of noninvasive tests versus pulmonary angiography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 1981;70:17-22.
41. Nilsson T, Turen J, Billstrom A, et al. Validity of pulmonary cine arteriography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:276-280.
42. Henry JW, Relyea B, Stein PD. Continuing risk of thromboemboli among patients with normal pulmonary angiograms. Chest. 1995;107:1375-1378.
43. Novelline RA, Baltarowich OH, Athanasoulis CA, et al. The clinical course of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative pulmonary arteriogram. Radiology. 1978;126:561-567.
44. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Pulmonary angiography, ventilation lung scanning, and venography for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism with abnormal perfusion lung scan. Ann Intern Med. 1983;98:891-899.
45. van Rooij WJ, den Heeten GJ, Sluzewski M. Pulmonary embolism: diagnosis in 211 patients with use of selective pulmonary digital subtraction angiography with a flow-directed catheter. Radiology. 1995;195:793-797.
46. van Beek EJ, Bakker AJ, Reekers JA. Pulmonary embolism: interobserver agreement in the interpretation of conventional angiographic and DSA images in patients with nondiagnostic lung scan results. Radiology. 1996;198:721-724.
47. Montgomery AB, Gilkeson RC, Glauser J, et al. The role of spiral CT using the pulmonary embolus protocol: a comparison of emergency department and hospitalized populations. Emerg Radiol. 2000;7:25-30.
48. Senac JP, Vernhet H, Bousquet C, et al. [Pulmonary embolism: contribution of spiral x-ray computed tomography]. J Radiol. 1995;76:339-345.
49. Kim KI, Müller NL, Mayo JR. Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: utility of spiral CT. Radiology. 1999;210:693-697.
50. van Rossum AB, Pattynama PM, Mallens WM, et al. Can helical CT replace scintigraphy in the diagnostic process in suspected pulmonary embolism? A retrolective-prolective cohort study focusing on total diagnostic yield. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:90-96.
51. Lorut C, Ghossains M, Horellou MH, et al. A noninvasive diagnostic strategy including spiral computed tomography in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;162:1413-1418.
52. Shah AA, Davis SD, Gamsu G, et al. Parenchymal and pleural findings in patients with and patients without acute pulmonary embolism detected at spiral CT. Radiology. 1999;211:147-153.
53. White RH, McGahan JP, Daschbach MM, et al. Diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis using duplex ultrasound. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:297-304.
54. Wakefield TW, Greenfield LJ. Diagnostic approaches and surgical treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 1993;7:1251-1267.
55. Fraser JD, Anderson DR. Deep venous thrombosis: recent advances and optimal investigation with US. Radiology. 1999;211:9-24.
56. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, et al. A new noninvasive management strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med. 1989;149:2549-2555.
57. Goodman LR. 1999 plenary session: Friday imaging symposium: CT diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Radiographics. 2000;20:1201-1205.
58. Fishman EK, Horton KM. CT of suspected pulmonary embolism: study design optimization. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1002-1003.
59. Deleted in proof.
60. Loud PA, Grossman ZD, Klippenstein DL, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: a new diagnostic technique for suspected thromboembolic disease. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170:951-954.
61. Garg K, Kemp JL, Wojcik D, et al. Thromboembolic disease: comparison of combined CT pulmonary angiography and venography with bilateral leg sonography in 70 patients. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:997-1001.
62. Duwe KM, Shiau M, Budorick NE, et al. Evaluation of the lower extremity veins in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparison of helical CT venography and sonography. 2000 ARRS Executive Council Award I. Am Roentgen Ray Society. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1525-1531.
63. Loud PA, Katz DS, Bruce DA, et al. Deep venous thrombosis with suspected pulmonary embolism: detection with combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography. Radiology. 2001;219:498-502.
64. Begemann PG, Bonacker M, Kemper J, et al. Evaluation of the deep venous system in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism with multi-detector CT: a prospective study in comparison to Doppler sonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003;27:399-409.
65. Cham MD, Yankelevitz DF, Shaham D, et al. Deep venous thrombosis: detection by using indirect CT venography. The Pulmonary Angiography-Indirect CT Venography Cooperative Group. Radiology. 2000;216:744-751.
66. Loud PA, Katz DS, Klippenstein DL, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography in suspected thromboembolic disease: diagnostic accuracy for deep venous evaluation. Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:61-65.
67. Bruce D, Loud PA, Klippenstein DL, et al. Combined CT venography and pulmonary angiography: how much venous enhancement is routinely obtained? Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1281-1285.
68. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Willems V, et al. Pitfalls in CT venography of lower limbs and abdominal veins. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1465-1471.
69. Cigarroa RG, Lange RA, Williams RH, et al. Dosing of contrast material to prevent contrast nephropathy in patients with renal disease. Am J Med. 1989;86:649-652.
70. Meaney JF, Johansson LO, Ahlstrom H, et al. Pulmonary magnetic resonance angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:326-338.
71. Meaney JF, Prince MR. Pulmonary MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1999;7:393-409.
72. Vrachliotis TG, Bis KG, Shetty AN, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the pulmonary vascular tree. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2002;18:283-293.
73. Huynh TV, Bergin CJ, Hauschildt J, et al. Magnetic resonance detection of acute pulmonary emboli in a canine model with pathologic correlation. Acad Radiol. 1996;3:1019-1024.
74. Meaney JF, Weg JG, Chenevert TL, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism with magnetic resonance angiography. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1422-1427.
75. Gupta A, Frazer CK, Ferguson JM, et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: diagnosis with MR angiography. Radiology. 1999;210:353-359.
76. Haage P, Piroth W, Krombach G, et al. Pulmonary embolism: comparison of angiography with spiral computed tomography, magnetic resonance angiography, and real-time magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:729-734.
77. Oudkerk M, van Beek EJ, Wielopolski P, et al. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and conventional pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective study. Lancet. 2002;359:1643-1647.
78. Prince MR, Grist TM, Debatin JF, et al. 3D Contrast MR Angiography, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag, 2003.
79. Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Knelson MH, et al. 1992 ARRS Executive Council Award. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging with contrast venography. Am J Roentenol. 1993;161:131-139.
80. Carpenter JP, Holland GA, Baum RA, et al. Magnetic resonance venography for detection of deep venous thrombosis: comparison with contrast venography and duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:734-741.
81. Laissy JP, Cinqualbre A, Loshkajian A, et al. Assessment of deep venous thrombosis in the lower limbs and pelvis: MR venography versus duplex Doppler sonography. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:971-975.
82. Polak JF, Fox LA. MR assessment of the extremity veins. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 1999;20:36-46.
83. Dupas B, el Kouri D, Curtet C, et al. Angiomagnetic resonance imaging of iliofemorocaval venous thrombosis. Lancet. 1995;346:17-19.
84. Evans AJ, Sostman HD, Witty LA, et al. Detection of deep venous thrombosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and sonography. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1996;6:44-51.