Comparison of propofol consumption and recovery time in Caucasians from Italy, with Chinese, Malays and Indians from Malaysia

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 250-255

  Ortolani, O ^a,d   Conti, A ^b   Chan, Y K ^c   Sie, M Y ^c   Ong, G S Y ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY MALAYA MEDICAL CENTRE   (Malaysia)

^d NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia; Anesthesia; Asian; Caucasian; Cytochrome P450; Fentanyl; Intravenous; Propofol

Indexed keywords

ATROPINE; FENTANYL; MUSCLE RELAXANT AGENT; NEOSTIGMINE; PANCURONIUM; PROPOFOL;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CAUCASIAN; CHINESE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA REFLEX; ETHNIC DIFFERENCE; ETHNIC GROUP; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIAN; INTRAVENOUS ANESTHESIA; ITALY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALAYSIA; MALE; PATIENT MONITORING; VERBALIZATION;

EID: 1842524066     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0403200215     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Xie HG, Kim RB, Wood AJ, Stein CM. Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001; 41:815-850.
2. Ortolani O, Conti A, Sall-Ka B et al. The recovery of Senegalese African blacks from intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil is slower than that of Caucasians. Anesth Analg 2001; 93:1222-1226.
3. Rampil IJ. A primer for EEG signal processing in anaesthesia. Anesthesiology 1998; 89:980-1002.
4. Ortolani O, Conti A, Ngumi ZW et al. Ethnic differences in propofol and fentanyl response: A comparison among Caucasians, Kenyan Africans, and Brazilians. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003; 20 (in press).
5. Bradford LD. CYP2D6 allele frequency in European Caucasians, Asians, Africans and their descendants. Pharmacogenomics 2002; 3:229-243.
6. Sutherland L, Ebner T, Burchell B. The expression of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases of the UGT1 family in human liver and kidney and in response to drugs. Biochem Pharmacol 1993; 45:295-301.
7. Shimizu M, Matsumoto Y, Tatsuno M, Fukuoka M. Glucuronidation of propofol and its analogs by human and rat liver microsomes. Biol Pharm Bull 2003; 26:216-219.
8. Simons P, Cockshott I, Douglas E, Gordon E, Knott S, Ruane R. Species differences in blood profiles, metabolism and excretion of 14C-propofol after intravenous dosing to rat, dog and rabbit. Xenobiotica 1991; 21:1243-1256.
9. Court MH, Duan SX, Hesse LM, Venkatakrishnan K, Greenblatt DJ. Cytochrome P-450 2B6 is responsible for interindividual variability of propofol hydroxylation by human liver microsomes. Anesthesiology 2001; 94:110-119.
10. Vuyk J. Clinical interpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic propofol interactions. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 2001; 52:445-451.
11. Nakayama M, Ichinose H, Yamamoto S, Kanaya N, Namiki A. The effect of fentanyl on hemodynamic and bispectral index changes during anesthesia induction with propofol. J Clin Anesth 2002; 14:146-149.