Acquired brain injury, visual attention, and the useful field of view test: A pilot study

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 474-478

  Calvanio, Ron ^a   Williams, Rebecca ^b   Burke, David T ^a,c   Mello, Jennifer ^a   Lepak, Paige ^a   Al Adawi, Samir ^c,d   Shah, Mrugeshkumar K ^a,c  

^a and Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Home Base Program   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d SULTAN QABOOS UNIVERSITY   (Oman)

Author keywords

Attention; Brain injuries; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE COURSE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EXPERIMENTAL TEST; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAPER; PATIENT SELECTION; PILOT STUDY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREDICTION; REHABILITATION CENTER; SCORING SYSTEM; TECHNIQUE; USEFUL FIELD OF VIEW TEST; COGNITIVE DEFECT; EVALUATION; LENGTH OF STAY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; ATTENTION; BRAIN INJURIES; COGNITION DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PILOT PROJECTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 1842509206     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00469-6     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Dobkin B.H. Neurologic rehabilitation. 1996;FA Davis, Philadelphia
2. Stuss D.T., Shallice T., Alexander M.P., Picton T.W. A multidisciplinary approach to anterior attentional functions. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 769:1995;191-211
3. Whyte J., DiPasquale M.C. Assessment of vision and visual attention in minimally responsive brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 76:1995;804-810
4. Stuss D.T., Stethem L.L., Hugenholtz H., Picton T., Pivik J., Richard M.T. Reaction time after head injury fatigue, divided and focused attention, and consistency of performance. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 52:1989;742-748
5. Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. Mesulam M. 2nd ed. 2000;Oxford Univ Pr, New York
6. Swanson J., Posner M.I., Cantwell D., et al. Attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder symptom domains, cognitive processes, and neural networks. Parasuraman R. The attentive brain. 1998;44-60 MIT Pr, Cambridge
7. Ball K., Owsley C., Sloane M.E., Roenker D.L., Bruni J.R. Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 34:1993;3110-3123
8. Ball K.K., Beard B.L., Roenker D.L., Miller R.L., Griggs D.S. Age and visual search expanding the useful field of view. J Opt Soc Am A. 5:1988;2210-2219
9. Fisk G.D., Novack T., Mennemeier M., Roenker D. Useful field of view after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 17:2002;16-25
10. Mazer B.L., Sofer S., Korner-Bitensky N., Gelinas I. Use of the UFOV to evaluate and retrain visual attention skills in clients with stroke a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 55:2001;552-557
11. Lezak M.D. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. 1995;Oxford Univ Pr, New York
12. Granger C.V., Hamilton B.B. UDS report. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 71:1992;108-113
13. Johnston M.V., Wood K.D., Fiedler R. Characteristics of effective and efficient rehabilitation programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 84:2003;410-418