Fingerprint image enhancement by differential hysteresis processing

Forensic Science International

Volumn 141, Issue 2-3, 2004, Pages 109-113

  Blotta, Eduardo ^a   Moler, Emilce ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Differential hysteresis processing; Fingerprint; Image digital processing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DEVICE; FINGER DERMATOGLYPHICS; HUMAN; HYSTERESIS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; MEDICAL EXPERT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 1842503214     PISSN: 03790738     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Fingerprint-based forensics identify Argentina's desaparecidos, IEEE Comp. Graphics Appl. 20 (2000) 7-10.
2. Dalrymple B.E., Menzies T. Computer enhancement of evidence through background noise suppression. J. Forensic Sci. 39:1994;537-546.
3. Moler E., Ballarin V., Pessana F., Torres S., Olmo D. Fingerprint identification using image enhancement techniques. J. Forensic Sci. 43:1998;689-692.
4. Bramble S.K., Jackson G.R. Operational experience of fingermark enhancement by frequency domain filtering. J. Forensic Sci. 39:1994;920-932.
5. S. Greenberg, M. Aladjem, D. Kogan, I. Dimitrov, Fingerprint image enhancement using filtering techniques, in: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference, Pattern Recognition 3 (2000) 322-325.
6. Vigo G.P., Hueber D.M., Vo-Dinh T. Evaluation of data treatment techniques for improved analysis of fingerprint images. J. Forensic Sci. 40:1995;826-837.
7. V. Ballarin, E. Moler, S. Torres, M. Gonzalez, Noise suppression by morphological filters, in: Proceedings of the Second International Worshop on Image and Signal Processing: Theory, Methodology, Systems and Applications, European Association of Signal Processing, Budapest, Hungary, 2000, pp. 128-132.
8. J. Serra, Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology, vol. I, Academic Press Limited, London, 1982.
9. A.K. Jain, Fundamentals of Digital Image Processing, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1989.
10. P. Klaus-Ruediger, Digital differential hysteresis image processing displays what the microscope acquires but the eye can't see, in: G.W. Bailey, A.J. Garratt-Reed (Eds.), Fifty-Second Annual Meeting Microscopy Society America, San Francisco Press, Inc., 1994, pp. 416-417.
11. Klaus-Ruediger P. Collection deficiences of scanning electron microscopy signal contrasts measured and corrected by differential hysteresis image processing. Scanning. 18:1996;539-555.
12. Hicks A.F. Computer imaging for questioned documents examiners. I. The benefits. J. Forensic Sci. 40:1995;1045-1051.
13. Hicks A.F. Computer imaging for questioned documents examiners. II. The potential for abuse. J. Forensic Sci. 40:1995;1052-1054.
14. Behnen A.P., Nelson L.K. Additional applications of digital image processing to forensic document examinations. J. Forensic Sci. 37:1992;797-803.