About invariance and intercorrelation of factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the Trier Integrated Personality Inventory (TIPI);Zur Replizierbarkeit und Interkorrelationsstruktur der Faktoren im revidierten NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar (NEO-PI-R) und Trierer Integrierten Persönlichkeitsinventar (TIPI)

Diagnostica

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 39-48

  Becker, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Big Five; Factor analysis; Five factor personality model; NEO PI R; TIPI

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842485907     PISSN: 00121924     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0012-1924.50.1.39     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Amelang, M. & Bartussek, D. (2001). Differentielle Psychologie und Persönlichkeitsforschung (5., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
2. Barbaranelli, C. & Caprara, G. V. (2002). Studies of the Big Five Questionnaire. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 109-128). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
3. Becker, P. (1999). Das Fünf-Faktoren-Modell der Persönlichkeit: Eine Zwischenbilanz. In W. Hacker & M. Rinck (Hrsg.), Zukunft gestalten. Bericht über den 41. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Dresden 1998 (S. 191-203). Lengerich: Pabst.
4. Becker, P. (2002). Das Trierer Integrierte Persönlichkeitsinventar. Entwicklung des Verfahrens und vergleichende psychometrische Analysen nach dem ordinalen Rasch-Modell und der klassischen Testtheorie. Diagnostica, 48, 68-79.
5. Becker, P. (2003). Das Trierer Integrierte Persönlichkeitsinventar TIPI. Testmanual. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
6. Becker, P. & Kupsch, M. (2002). The Four-plus-X Factor model for the description of normal and disordered personality as an alternative to the Five-Factor model: A test of two models. Trierer Psychologische Berichte, 29, Heft 1. Universität Trier. Fachbereich I-Psychologie.
7. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: A study on the 5-factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515-524.
8. Caruso, J. C. & Cliff, N. (1997). An examination of the five-factor model of normal personality variation with reliable component analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 317-325.
9. Cattell, R. B. (1995). The fallacy of five factors in the personality sphere. The Psychologist, 8, 207-208.
10. Church, A. T. & Burke, P. J. (1994). Exploratory and confirmatory tests of the Big Five and Tellegen's three- and four-dimensional models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 93-114.
11. Costa, P. T. J. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory and NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. Costa, P. T. J. & McCrae, R. R. (1995). Domains and facets: Hierarchical personality assessment using the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 64, 21-50.
13. De Raad, B. (2000). The Big Five Personality Factors. The psycholexical approach to personality. Göttingen: Hogrefe & Huber.
14. De Raad, B. & Perugini, M. (2002 a). Big Five factor assessment: Introduction. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 1-26). Bern: Hogrefe & Huber.
15. De Raad, B. & Perugini, M. (2002 b). Big Five Assessment. Bern: Hogrefe & Huber.
16. Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
17. Gerbing, D. W. & Anderson, J. C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572-580.
18. Guadagnoli, E. & Velicer, W. (1991). A comparison of pattern matching indices. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 26, 323-343.
19. Hendriks, A. A. J., Hofstee, W. K. B. & De Raad, B. (2002). The Five-Factor Personality Inventory: Assessing the Big Five by means of brief and concrete statements. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 79-108). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
20. Hofer, S. M. & Eber, H. W. (2002). Second-order factor structure of the Cattell Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 397-409). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
21. Hogan, R. & Hogan, J. (2002). The Six Factor Personality Questionnaire. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment. Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
22. Hu, L. & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
23. Jackson, D. N. & Tremblay, P. F. (2002). The Six Factor Personality Questionnaire. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 353-375). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
24. John, O. P. & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality. Theory and research. 2nd Edition (pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford.
25. MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S. & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
26. Marsh, H., Balla, J. R. & McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391-410.
27. Maruyama, G. (1998). Basics of structural equation modelling. London: Sage.
28. McCrae, R. R. (1989). Why I advocate the Five-Factor Model: Joint factor analyses of the NEO-PI with other instruments. In D. M. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology (pp. 237-245). New York: Springer.
29. McCrae, R. R. & Costa, P. T. J. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
30. McCrae, R. R. & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the Five-Factor Model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175-215.
31. McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T. J., Bond, M. H. & Paunonen, S. V. (1996). Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory factor analysis versus Procrustes rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552-566.
32. Mulaik, S. A. (1992). The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (1994). A comparison of different Instruments proposed to measure the Big Five. European Review of Applied Psychology, 44, 45-53.
34. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (in Druck). NEO-Persönlichkeitsinventar nach Costa und McCrae, revidierte Form (NEO-PI-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
35. Panter, A. T., Tanaka, J. S. & Hoyle, R. H. (1994). Structural models for multimode designs in personality and temperament research. In C. R. Halverson, G. A. Kohnstamm & R. P. Martin (Eds.), The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood (pp. 118-138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Parker, J. D. A., Bagby, R. M. & Summerfeldt, L. J. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 463-466.
37. Perugini, M. & Di Blas, L. (2002). The Big Five Marker Scales (BFMS) and the Italian AB5C taxonomy: Analyses from an etic-emic perspective. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 281-304). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
38. Saucier, G. & Goldberg, L. R. (2002). Assessing the Big Five: Applications of 10 psychometric criteria to the development of marker scales. In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 29-58). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
39. Schutte, N. S., Malouff, J. M., Segrera, E., Wolf, A. & Rodgers, L. (2003). States reflecting the Big Five dimensions. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 591-603.
40. Trull, T. J. & Widiger, T. A. (2002). The Structured Interview for the Five Factor Model of Personality (SIFFM). In B. De Raad & M. Perugini (Eds.), Big Five Assessment (pp. 147-170). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
41. Walker, A. J. (1997). Thesaurus of psychological index terms. Eighth edition. Washington: American Psychological Association.