Demand articulation, a key factor in the reconfiguration of the present Japanese science and technology system

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 55-67

  Kobayashi, Shinichi ^a   Okubo, Yoshiko ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b ECOLE CENTRALE PARIS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE; POST-WAR; SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; TWENTIETH CENTURY;

EID: 1842482080     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3152/147154304781780172     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. CHSTP, Commission on the History of Science and Technology Policy (1991), Historical Review of Japanese Science and Technology Policy, (CHSTP, Tokyo).
2. Fujigaki, Yuko, and Akiya Nagata (1998), "Concept evolution in science and technology policy: the process of change in relationships among university, industry and government", Science and Public Policy, 26(6), December, pages 387-395.
3. Gibbons, Michael, Camille Limoges, Helga Nowotny, Simon Schwartzman, Peter Scott and Martin Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge (Sage Publications, London).
4. Government of Japan (1995), Basic Law for Science and Technology, 15 November (Government of Japan, Tokyo).
5. Government of Japan (1996), Basic Plan for Science and Technology, 2 July (Government of Japan, Tokyo).
6. Greenberg, Daniel S (1999), The Politics of Pure Science (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, new edition).
7. Guston, David H (2000), Between Politics and Science (Cambridge University Press, Rutgers NJ).
8. Hwang Hee, Cho, and Ryo Hirasawa (1998), "Changes in Japanese government policies to be a front-runner in science and technology", Science and Public Policy, 25(l), February, pages 47-54.
9. Ishi, Hiromitsu (2002), How will universities change? (Kodansha, Tokyo).
10. Kiba, T, and S. Collinson (1998), "R&D performance in Japanese companies: a relative evaluation of overseas-based and domestic R&D", Science and Public Policy 25(4), August, pages 227-238.
11. Koizumi, Koji (1993), "Historical turning points in Japanese joint research policy", Science and Public Policy, 20(5), pages 313-322.
12. Kuhn, Thomas S (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
13. Leydesdorff, Loet, and Henry Etzkowitz (2000), "Le 'Mode 2' et la globalisation des systèmes d'innovation 'nationaux': le modèle à triple hélice des relations entre université industrie et gouvernement", Sociologie et Société, 32(l), pages 135-156.
14. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2001a), Investigation on R&D Activities of Private Firms 2000(Science and Technology Policy Bureau, MEXT, Tokyo).
15. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2001b), The Basic Plan for Structural Reform of Universities, 12 June (MEXT, Tokyo).
16. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports and Science and Technology (2002), White Paper on Science and Technology Towards the Creation of a Knowledge-Based Society and Economy for the New Era (MEXT, Tokyo)..
17. MEXT, Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2003), White Paper on Science and Technology, Science and Technology Talents Required in Japan for the Future (MEXT, Tokyo).
18. Monbusho, Ministry of Education, Science and Culture (1991), Educational Policy of Japan (Monbusho, Tokyo).
19. NISTEP, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (1998), Composite S&T Indicators: ratio of each component (NISTEP, Tokyo).
20. NISTEP, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (1999), Internationalization of R&D in Japanese Firms and Policy Recommendations of Domestic R&D System (NISTEP, Tokyo).
21. NISTEP, National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (2000), S&T Indicators (NISTEP, Tokyo).
22. Niwa, Fumio, and Hiroyuki Tomizawa (1995), "Composite indicators: international comparison of overall strengths in science and technology", in Science and Technology Indicator Project Team (editor), Science and Technology Indicators 1994 - A Systematic Analysis of Science and Technology Activities in Japan (NISTEP Report 37, Tokyo).
23. Okubo, Yoshiko (1997), Science et Technologie - le mariage japonais (Editions ESKA, Paris).
24. Okubo, Yoshiko, and Cecilia Sjöberg (2000), "The changing pattern of industrial scientific research collaboration in Sweden", Research Policy, 29, pages 81-98.
25. Salomon, Jean-Jacques (1986), Le gaulois, le cow-boy et le samourai(Economica, Paris).
26. Sawa, Akihiro (2001), "Transforming research organization to independent administrative institution and the reform of national universities", in M Aoki, A Sawa and M Daidou (editors), University Reform (Toyo Keizai Shinbun sha, Tokyo) pages 393-427.
27. STA, Science and Technology Agency (1992), Globalization of Scientific and Technological Activities and Issues Japan is Encountering, White Paper on Science and Technology (STA, Tokyo).
28. STA, Science and Technology Agency (1996), Aiming to become a Front-runner in Research Activity, White Paper on Science and Technology (STA, Tokyo).
29. STA, Science and Technology Agency (1999), New Development of Science Policy: responding to national and societal needs, White Paper on Science and Technology (STA, Tokyo).
30. STA, Science and Technology Agency (2000), Annual Report on Promotion of Science and Technology (STA, Tokyo).
31. STA, Science and Technology Agency (2001), Towards the 21st Century, White Paper on Science and Technology (STA, Tokyo)
32. Statistics Bureau (1999), Report on the Survey of R&D (Statistics Bureau, Tokyo).
33. Weinberg, Alvin (1961), "Impact of large-scale science on the United States", Science, 21 July, page 164.
34. Wen, Jiang, and Shinichi Kobayashi (2001), "Exploring collaborative R&D network: some new evidence in Japan", Research Policy, 30, pages 1309-1319.
35. Whiston, Thomas G (2000), "Science under pressure? The challenge of the global environment", Science under Pressure (The Danish Institute for Studies in Research and Research Policy, Denmark).