Geopolitical legacies and central european export linkages: A historical and gravity model analysis of hungary

Professional Geographer

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 57-70

  Buckwalter, Donald W ^a,b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Central europe; Cold war; Geopolitics; International trade; Transition economies

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842475005     PISSN: 00330124     EISSN: 14679272     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0033-0124.00103     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Barnes, Trevor J. 1991. Metaphors and conversations in economic geography: Richard Rorty and the gravity model. Geografiska Annaler 73B: 111-20.
2. Berend, Ivan T. 1971. The problem of Eastern European economic integration in a historical perspective. In Foreign Trade in a Planned Economy, ed. Imre Vajda and Mihály Simai, 1-28. Cambridge, U.K.: University Press.
3. Bergstrand, Jeffrey H. 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 474-81.
4. Bikker, Jacob A. 1987. An international trade flow model with substitution: an extension of the gravity model. Kyklos 40: 315-37.
5. Bleaney, Michael. 1990. Some trade policy issues in the transition to a market economy in Eastern Europe. The World Economy 13: 250-62.
6. Bogomolov, Oleg. 1980. TheCMEACountries in the changing international economic climate. In Partners in East-West Economic Relations: The Determinants of Choice, ed. Zbigniew M. Fallenbuchl and Carl H. McMillan, 5-17. New York: Pergamon Press.
7. Branda, Jozef C. 1992. Political economy of the Eastern European-Soviet trade: rethinking the past and searching for the future. In Constructing Capitalism: The Reemergence of Civil Society and Liberal Economy in the Post-Communist World, ed. Kazimierz Z. Poznanski, 47-68. Boulder, CO:Westview.
8. Bröcker, Johannes. 1984. How do international trade barriers affect interregional trade? In Regional and Industrial Development Theories, Models, and Empirical Evidence, ed. Ake E. Anderson, Walter Isard, and Tönu Puu, 219-39. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
9. Bröcker, Johannes. 1989. Partial equilibrium theory of interregional trade and the gravity model. Papers of the Regional Science Association 66: 7-18.
10. Clissold, Stephen, ed. 1966. A Short History of Yugoslavia from Early Times to 1966. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
11. Csaba, László. 1993. Economic consequences of Soviet disintegration for Hungary. In Hungary: An Economy in Transition, 27-43, ed. István Székely and David Newberg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. East, Gordon. 1961. The concept and political status of the shatter zone. In Geographical Essays on Eastern Europe, ed. Norman J. G. Pounds, 1-27. Bloomington: Indiana University Publications.
13. Grant, Richard. 1994. The geography of international trade. Progress in Human Geography 18: 298-312.
14. Hanink, Dean M. 1987. A comparative analysis of the competitive geographical trade performances of the USA, FRG, and Japan: the markets and marketers hypothesis. Economic Geography 63: 293-305.
15. Hartshorne, Richard. 1941. The politico-geographic pattern of the world. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 218: 45-57.
16. Hartwig, Frederick, and Brian E. Dearing. 1979. Exploratory Data Analysis. Series: Quantitative Applications in The Social Sciences no. 16. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
17. Hughes, Gordon, and Paul G. Hare. 1992. Industrial policy and restructuring in Eastern Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8: 82-103.
18. Kadar, Bela. 1990. The EC: a Hungarian view toward 1992. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 22: 269-81.
19. Knirsch, Peter. 1980. The significance of economic interdependence arising from East-West relations. In Partners in East-West Economic Relations: The Determinants of Choice, ed. Zbigniew M. Fallenbuchl and Carl H. McMillan, 51-75. New York: Pergamon Press.
20. Kostecki, M. M. 1979. East-West Trade and the GATT System. Trade Policy Research Centre Series. London: MacMillan.
21. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. 1933. Külkereskedelmi Forgalma, 1931. Budapest: Stephaneum Nyomda. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. various years. Külkereskedelmi Statisztikai Évkönyv. International trade statistical yearbook of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office. Budapest: 1958, 1962, 1970, 1973, 1976, 1980, 1985.
22. Lloyd, Peter J. 1968. International Trade Problems of Small Nations. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
23. Matzner, Egon. 1970. Trade between East and West: The Case of Austria, Stockholm Economic Studies, New Series XII. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.
24. Mellor, Roy E. H. 1975. Eastern Europe: A Geography of the Comecon Countries. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Michalak, Wieslaw Z., and Richard A. Gibb. 1992. A debt to the West: recent developments in the international financial situation of East-Central Europe. Professional Geographer 44: 260-71.
26. Nagorski, Zygmundt, Jr. 1974. The Psychology of East- West Trade. New York: Mason and Lipscomb.
27. Oguledo, Victor I., and Craig R. MacPhee. 1994. Gravity models: a reformulation and an application to discriminatory trade arrangements. Applied Economics 26: 107-20.
28. Pelzman, Joseph. 1977. Trade creation and trade diversion in the Council of Mutual Economic Assistance: 1954-1970. American Economic Review 67: 713-22.
29. Pollins, Brian M. 1989. Conflict, cooperation, and commerce: the effects of international political interactions on bilateral trade flows. American Journal of Political Science 33: 737-61.
30. Richter, Sándor. 1992.Hungary's changing patterns of trade and their effects. Soviet Studies 44: 965-83.
31. Rugg, Dean S. 1985. Eastern Europe. The World's Landscapes series. London: Longman.
32. Russell, Richard J., and Fred Kniffen. 1951. Culture Worlds. New York: MacMillan.
33. Sheppard, Eric S. 1984. The distance-decay gravity model debate. In Spatial Statistics and Models, ed. Gary L. Gaile and Cort J.Wilmott, 367-88. Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
34. Simai, Mihály. 1980. Choice of partners in international economic relations: the Hungarian experience. In Partners in East-West Economic Relations:The Determinants ofChoice, ed. ZbigniewM.Fallenbuchl and Carl H. McMillan, 219-35. New York: Pergamon Press.
35. Singleton, Frederick B. 1976. Twentieth Century Yugoslavia. New York: Columbia University Press.
36. Thoman, Richard S., and Edgar C. Conkling. 1967. Geography of International Trade. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
37. Turnock, David. 1989. Eastern Europe: An Economic and Political Geography. London: Routledge.
38. United Nations.Various years. International Trade Statistics Yearbook. New York.
39. van Bergeuk, Peter A. G., and Harry Oldersma. 1990. Détente, market-oriented reform, and German unification: potential consequences for the world trade system. Kyklos 43: 599-609.
40. Wanklyn, Harriet G. 1941. The Eastern Marchlands of Europe. London: George Philip and Son.
41. Wasowski, Stanislaw. 1970. East-West trade and the pattern of world trade. In East-West Trade and the Technology Gap:APolitical and Economic Appraisal, ed. StanislawWasowski, 171-93. New York: Praeger.