The opportunity cost of preservation of woodland on farms

Australian Forestry

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 38-44

  Middleton, M M ^a   Lockyer, M J ^a   Dean, N A ^a   Sinden, J A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842463623     PISSN: 00049158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00049158.1999.10674761     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. ABARE (1995). Trees on farms: Survey of trees on Australian farms 1993-94. ABARE Research Report 95.7.
2. Bostedt, G. and L. Mattson (1996). Confrontation or compromise? Determining appropriate institutions for environmental conflict resolution, Journal of Forest Economics 2 (2), 131-148.
3. Dean, Nicholas (1997). An analysis of potential participation and enrolment in SEPP 46. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Agricultural Economics, University of New England.
4. Department of Land and Water Conservation 1998a. Native Vegetation Conservation Act: An introduction, Factsheet No 1.
5. Department of Land and Water Conservation 1998b. Native Vegetation Conservation Act: Why was the Act introduced?, Factsheet No 2.
6. Ferguson, Ian S. (1996). Sustainable Forest Management, Oxford University Press.
7. Lockyer, Megan J. (1996). Response to SEPP 46 regulations by Walcha Shire landholders. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Agricultural Economics, University of New England.
8. Middleton, Mark H. G. (1996). An analysis of participation in vegetation conservation programs in New South Wales, Fourth year Bachelor of Agricultural Economics dissertation, University of New England.
9. Vincent, Jeffrey R. and Clark S. Binkley (1993). Efficient Multiple-Use Forestry may require Land-Use Specialization, Land Economics 69 (4): 370-376.
10. Whitby, Martin and Caroline Saunders (1996). Estimating the Supply of Conservation Goods in Britain: A Comparison of the Financial Efficiency of Two Policy Instruments, Land Economics 72 (3): 313-325.