Endoscopic suprapapillary blunt dissection of the distal common bile duct in cases of difficult cannulation: A pilot series

Endoscopy

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 317-321

  Hashiba, K ^a,b   D'Assuncao M A ^a   Armellini, S ^a   Hassegawa, R T ^a   Cappellanes, C A ^a   Moribe, D ^a  

^a HOSPITAL SÍRIO LIBANÊS   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMYLASE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILIARY TRACT CANCER; CANNULATION; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT DISEASE; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; DISSECTION; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; HYPERAMYLASEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEEDLE; PANCREATITIS; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT FAILURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AMPULLA OF VATER; BILIARY TRACT DISEASES; CATHETERIZATION; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COMMON BILE DUCT; DISSECTION; ELECTROCOAGULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; SAFETY; SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 1842450922     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-814410     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Schapira L, Khawaja FI. Endoscopic fistulo-sphincterotomy: An alternative method of sphincterotomy using a new sphincterotome. Endoscopy 1982; 14: 58-60
2. Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: A prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
3. Baillie J. Needle-knife papillotomy revisited. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 282-284
4. Rabenstein T. Benefits ands risks of needle-knife papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 46: 207-221
5. Rollhauser C. Needle-knife papillotomy: A helpful and safe adjunct to ERCP in a selected population. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 691-696
6. Farrell RJ, Khan MI, Noonan H et al. Endoscopic papillectomy: a novel approach to difficult cannulation. Gut 1996; 39: 36-38
7. Passi RB, Rankin RN. The transhepatic approach to a failed endoscopic sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1986; 32: 211-225
8. Shorvos PS, Cotton PB, Mason RR et al. Percutaneous transhepatic assistance for duodenoscopic sphincterotomy. Gut 1985; 26: 2373-2376
9. Adamek HE, Weitz M, Breer H et al. Value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) after unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy 1997; 29: 741-744
10. Topazian M, Kozarek R, Stoler R et al. Clinical utility of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1997; 43: 393-399
11. Christoforidis E, Goulimaris I, Kanellos I et al. Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasemia: Patient-related and operative risk factors. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 286-292
12. Rabenstein T, Hahn EG. Post-ERCP pancreatitis: New momentum. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 325-329
13. Dowsett JF, Polydorou AA, Vaira D et al. Needle-knife papillotomy: How safe and effective? Gut 1990; 31: 905-908
14. Shakoor T, Geenen JE. Pre-cut papillotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992; 38: 623-627
15. Siegel HJ. Pre-cut papillotomy: A method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy. Endoscopy 1980; 20: 130-133
16. Siegel HJ, Bem-Zsi JS, Pullano W. The needle-knife: A valuable tool in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35: 499-503
17. Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: An attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
18. Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke DL. Needle-knife access papillotomy: An unfairly maligned technique [editorial]? Endoscopy 1996; 28: 365-366
19. Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux A et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy. results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 991-997
20. Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K. et al. ERCP-related perforations: Risk factors and management. Endoscopy 2002; 34: 293-297