Growth of new start-up firms: Evidence from the Japanese manufacturing industry

Applied Economics

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 343-355

  Honjo, Yuji ^a  

^a CHUO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; MANUFACTURING; SPECIALIZATION;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN;

EID: 1842430707     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840410001674277     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amemiya, T. (1985) Advanced Econometrics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
2. Audretsch, D. B. (1995) Innovation and Industry Evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Audretsch, D. B. and Mahmood, T. (1995) New firm survival: new results using a hazard function, Review of Economics and Statistics, 73, 97-103.
4. Audretsch, D. B., Santarelli, E. and Vivarelli, M. (1999) Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 965-83.
5. Bates, T. (1990) Entrepreneur human capital inputs and small business longevity, Review of Economics and Statistics, 72, 551-9.
6. Baumol, W. J. (1959) Business Behavior, Value and Growth, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. New York.
7. Brush, T. H., Bromiley, P. and Hendrickx, M. (2000) The free cash flow hypothesis for sales growth and firm performance, Strategic M anagement Journal, 21, 455-72.
8. Doms, M., Dunne, T. and Roberts, M. J. (1995) The role of technology use in the survival and growth of manufacturing plants, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 523-42.
9. Evans, D. S. (1987a) Tests of alternative theories of firm growth, Journal of Political Economy, 95, 657-74.
10. Evans, D. S. (1987b) The relationship between firm growth, size and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 567-81.
11. Feldman, M. P. and Audretsch, D. B. (1999) Innovation in cities: science-based diversity, specialization and localized competition, European Economic Review, 43, 409-29.
12. Geroski, P. A. (1995) What do we know about entry?, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421-40.
13. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Shleifer, A. (1992) Growth in cities, Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126-52.
14. Greene, W. H. (1999) Econometric Analysis: 4th Edition, Prentice-Hall, NJ.
15. Hall, B. H. (1987) The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 583-606.
16. Harhoff, D., Stahl, K. and Woywode, M. (1998) Legal form, growth and exit of West German firms - empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries, Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 453-88.
17. Heckman, J. J. (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models, Annals of Economic Social Measurement, 5, 475-92.
18. Heckman, J. J. (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error, Econometrica, 47, 53-161.
19. Heshmati, A. (2001) On the growth of micro and small firms evidence from Sweden, Small Business Economics, 17, 213-28.
20. Honjo, Y. (2000a) Business failure of new firms: an empirical analysis using a multiplicative hazards model, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 557-74.
21. Honjo, Y. (2000b) Business failure of new software firms, Applied Economics Letters, 7, 575-9.
22. Jovanovic, B. (1982) Selection and evolution of industry, Econometrica, 50, 649-70.
23. Khemani, R. S. and Shapiro, D. M. (1986) The determinants of new plant entry in Canada, Applied Economics, 18, 1243-57.
24. Lee, L. F. (1982) Some approaches to the correction of selectivity bias, Review of Economic Studies, 49, 355-72.
25. Leung, S. F. and Yu, S. (1996) On the choice between sample selection and two-part models, Journal of Econometrics, 72, 197-229.
26. Liu, J., Tsou, M. and Hammitt, J. K. (1999) Do small plants grow faster? Evidence from the Taiwan electronics industry, Economics Letters, 65, 121-9.
27. Mata, J. (1994) Firm growth during infancy, Small Business Economics, 6, 27-39.
28. Mata, J. (1996) Markets, entrepreneurs and the size of new firms, Economics Letters, 52, 89-94.
29. Mata, J, Portugal, P. and Guimaraes, P. (1995) The survival of new plants: start-up conditions and post-entry evolution, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 459-81.
30. Porter, M. E. (1990) The Competitive Advantage of Nation, Free Press, New York.
31. Puhani, P. A. (2000) The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique, Journal of Economic Surveys, 14, 53-68.
32. Siegfried, J. J. and Evans, L. B. (1994) Empirical studies of entry and exit: a survey of the evidence, Review of Industrial Organization, 9, 121-55.
33. Simon, H. A. and Bonini, C. P. (1958) The size distribution of business firms, American Economic Review, 48, 607-17.
34. Small and Medium Enterprise Agency (1999) Chusho-Kigyo Hakusho [White Paper on Small and Medium Enterprise], Printing Bureau of the Ministry of Finance, Tokyo.
35. Storey, D. J. (1994) Understanding the Small Business Sector, Thomson Learning, London.
36. Storey, D. J. and Wynarczyk, P. (1996) The survival and non survival of micro firms in the UK, Review of Industrial Organization, 11, 211-29.
37. Sutton, J. (1997) Gibrat's legacy, Journal of Economic Literature, 25, 40-9.
38. White, H. (1980) A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroscedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817-38.