Numbers in evidence

British Journal of Occupational Therapy

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 47-49

  Eva, Gail ^a   Paley, John ^b  

^a JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; PHILOSOPHY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIGION; SOCIAL ASPECT;

EID: 1842429956     PISSN: 03080226     EISSN: 14776006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/030802260406700107     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Benner P (1999) Quality of life: A phenomenological perspective on explanation, prediction, and understanding in nursing science. In: EC Polifroni, M Welch, eds. Perspectives on philosophy of science in nursing: An historical and contemporary anthology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 303-14.
2. Boyle D (2000) The tyranny of numbers: Why counting can't makes us happy. London: Harper Collinds.
3. Cockburn L, Trentham B (2002) Participatory action research: integrating community occupational therapy practice and research. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(1), 20-30.
4. Cutcliffe JR, McKenna H (1999) Establishing the credibility of qualitative research findings: The plot thickens. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(2), 374-80.
5. Finlay L (2001) Holism in occupational therapy: Elusive fiction and ambivalent struggle. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(3), 268-76.
6. Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: Selected essay by Clifford Geertz. New York: Basic Books.
7. Gillies JCM (2001) Distinguishing means from ends: The problem of modern medicine. Proceedings of the Royal College of Physicians, 31, 58-59.
8. Greenhalgh T, Taylor R (1997) How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). British Medical Journal, 315, 740-43.
9. Hyde P (2002) RCTs: Legitimate research tool or fancy mathematics? (Letter). British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(9), 435-36.
10. Kelly G (1996) Understanding occupational therapy: A hermeneutic approach. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(5). 237-42.
11. Leonard V (1999) A Heideggerian phenomenologic perspective on the concept of the person. In: EC Polifroni, M Welch, eds. Perspectives on philosophy of science in nursing: An historical and contemporary anthology Philadelphia: Lippincott, 315-27.
12. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Maclean F, Jones D (2002) RCTs: Need for wider debate. (Letter). British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(6), 294-95.
14. Plager K (1994) Hermeneutic phenomenology: A methodology for family health and health promotion study in nursing. In: P Benner, ed. Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 65-83.
15. Rowe N (2003) The research process. Therapy Weekly, 2 October, 9.
16. Whiteford G, Townsend E, Hocking C (2000) Reflections on a renaissance of occupation. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 67(1), 61-69.