Quality of care in general practice is difficult to measure. A review 1997-2003;Kwaliteit van huisartsgeneeskundig handelen moeilijk te meten. Een literatuuroverzicht over 1997-2003

Huisarts en Wetenschap

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 184-187

  Braspenning, J ^a   Schiere, A M ^a   Van Roosmalen, M ^a   Mokkink, H ^a   Grol, R P T M ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASTHMA; CANCER SCREENING; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHILDBIRTH; CHRONIC DISEASE; CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE LUNG DISEASE; DEMENTIA; DIABETES MELLITUS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS INFECTION; HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA; HYPERTENSION; INFLUENZA VACCINATION; NETHERLANDS; OTITIS MEDIA; PRESCRIPTION; REVIEW; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

EID: 1842429753     PISSN: 00187070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Van den Hombergh P, Grol R, Van den Hoogen H, Van den Bosch WJ. Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: acceptance and feasibility. Qual Health Care 1999;8:167-71.
2. Bensing J. Doctor-patiënt communication and the quality of care. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:1301-10.
3. Ram P, Grol R, Rethans JJ, Schouten B, Van der Vleuten C, Kester A. Assessment of general practitioners by vido observation of communicative and medical performance in daily practice: issues of validity, reliability and feasibility. Med Educ 1999;33:447-54.
4. Van den Brink-Muinen A, Verhaak PF, Bensing JM, Bahrs O, Deveugeke M, Gask L, et al. Communication in general practice: differences between European countries. Fam Pract 2003;20:478-85.
5. Wensing M, Van der Vleuten C, Grol R, Felling A. The reliability of patients' judgements of care in general practice: how many questions and patients are needed? Qual Health Care 1997;6:80-5.
6. Jung HP, Van Horne F, Wensing M, Hearnshaw H, Grol R. Which aspects of general practitioners' behaviour determine patients' evaluations of care? Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1077-87.
7. Grol R, Wensing M, Mainz J, Ferreira P, Hearnshaw H, Hjortdahl P, et al. Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison. European Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice (EUROPEP). Fam Pract 1999;16:4-11.
8. Sixma HJ, Van Campen C, Kerssens JJ, Peters L. Quality of care from the perspective of elderly people: the QUOTE-elderly instrument. Age Ageing 2000;29:173-8.
9. Donabedian A. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring (vol 1): the definition of quality and approaches to its assessment. Ann Arbor, Mi: Health Administration Press, 1980.
10. Schuster M, McGlynn E, Brook R. How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q 1998;76:517-63.
11. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM, Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Qual Health Care 2001;10:152-8.
12. www.linh.nl
13. Schellevis FG, Westert GP, De Bakker DH, Groenewegen PP, Van der Zee J, Bensing JM. De tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartsenpraktijk: aanleiding en methoden. Huisarts Wet 2003;46:7-12.
14. Campbell SM, Braspenning J, Hutchinson A, Marshall M. Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:358-64.