Protecting America's Secrets while Maintaining Academic Freedom

Academic Medicine

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 333-342

  Keel, Brooks A ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC MEDICINE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; FOREIGN WORKER; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; POLICY; POLITICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SPEECH; TERRORISM; TRAINING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 1842427657     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200404000-00010     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Knight J. AAUP Special Committee on Academic Freedom and National Security in Time of Crisis meets to adopt mission statement 〈 http://www.aaup.org/newsroom/press/2002/911com2.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors, November 10, 2002.
2. American Association of University Professors. 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. Volume 2003 〈 http://www.aaup.org/statements/Redbook/1940stat.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors.
3. Chan V, Friedman J, Graves S, Sapolsky H, Widnall S. In the public interest. Report of the ad hoc faculty committee on access to and disclosure of scientific information; June 12, 2002 〈 http://web.mit.edu/faculty/reports/publicinterest.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
4. Malakoff D. Universities review policies for onsite research. Science. 2002;295:1438-9.
5. Shea DA. Balancing scientific publication and national security concerns: issues for Congress. Report No. RL32695 〈 http://www.fas.org/irp/crs/RL31695.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, January 10, 2003.
6. Borrego AM. White house gets input from universities as it drafts new rules on disclosure of some sensitive research. Chron Higher Educ. 2002;49:A36.
7. Borrego AM. In testimony, university officials reject 'sensitive' designation for scientific research 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2002/10/2002101102n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. October 11, 2002.
8. Malakoff D. Researchers see progress in finding the right balance. Science. 2002;298:529.
9. Marburger J. Statement before the House Committee on Science 〈http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full02/oct10/marburger.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, 2002.
10. Greenwood M. Testimony regarding "Conducting Research During the War on Terrorism: Balancing Openness and Security" 〈http://www. house.gov/science/hearings/full02/oct10/greenwood.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, 2002.
11. Widnall SE. Testimony before the House Committee on Science 〈http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full02/oct10/widnall.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, 2002.
12. Farrell EF. National Academies leaders say vague white house policies could set back science and security 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2002/10/2002102102n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ today's News. October 21, 2002.
13. Alberts B, Wulf WA, Fineberg H. Statement on science and security in an age of terrorism. http://www4.nationalacademies.org/news.nsf/isbn/s10182002b?OpenDocument. Accessed 13 July 2003. The National Academies, Washington, DC; October 18, 2002.
14. American Association of Universities. Definitions and regulations involved in the classified-sensitive information-unclassified debate 〈http://www.pmdtc.org/reference.htm#ITAR〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities, 2003.
15. Crowley JC. Science and secrecy: NSDD 189 - prologue to a new dialogue? [PowerPoint presentation]. 〈http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/JCC.ppt〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2003.
16. Greenberg DS. Self-restraint by scientists can avert federal intrusion. Chron Higher Ed. 2002;49:B20.
17. Gast A. The impact of restricting information access on science and technology 〈http://www.aau.edu/research/Gast.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities, 2003.
18. National Policy on the Transfer of Scientific, Technical and Engineering Information. National Security Decision Directive. Volume NSDD-189 〉http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/nsdd/nsdd-189.htm〈. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC, 1985.
19. Export Administration regulations 〈 http://w3.access.gpo.gov/bis/index. html〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security, 2003.
20. International Traffic in Arms regulations 〈 http://www.pmdtc.org/reference.htm#ITAR〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, 2003.
21. Powell PC, Norris JT, Hardy RB. Selected troublesome/unacceptable clauses related to information release and foreign nationals 〈http://mit.edu/osp/www/Troublesome%20Clauses4.doc〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and the Council on Government Relations, 2003.
22. Borrego AM. Colleges see more federal limits on research. Chron Higher Ed. 2002;49:A24.
23. Ehringhaus S, Owens M, Smith T, Turman R. The Association of American Universities Homeland Security Workshop: summary and action steps 〈http://www.ncsu.edu/sparcs/classified/aau_workshop.doc〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. New York: The Association of American Universities, April 12, 2003.
24. Hasselmo N, Margrath CP, Phillips K. Letter to John Marburger, January 31, 2003 〈http://www.nasulgc.org/Washington_Watch/Letters %202003/030131_Marburger.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: Association of American Universities, Council on Governmental Relations, and National Association of State Universities and LandGrant Colleges, 2003.
25. Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002. PL 107-108 〈 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname= 107_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ188.107〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC, 2002.
26. Malakoff D. Security rules leave labs wanting more guidance. Science. 2003;299:1175.
27. Malakoff D. One year after: tighter security reshapes research. Science. 2002;297:1630-3.
28. Malakoff D. New U.S. rules set the stage for tighter security, oversight. Science. 2002;298:2304.
29. Malakoff D. Congress adopts tough rules for labs. Science. 2002;296: 1585-6.
30. Vest CM. Response and responsibility. Balancing security and openness in research and education 〈 http://web.mit.edu/president/communications/rpt01-02.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, March 15, 2001.
31. Monastersky R. Publish and perish? As the nation fights terrorists, scientists weigh the risks of releasing sensitive information. Chron Higher Ed. 2002;49:A16-9.
32. Couzin J. Active poliovirus baked from scratch. Science. 2002;297: 174-5.
33. Rosengard AM, Liu Y, Nie Z, Jimenez R. Variola virus immune evasion design: expression of a highly efficient inhibitor of human complement. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8808-13.
34. Lachmann PJ. Microbial subversion of the immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:8461-2.
35. Cello J, Paul AV, Eckard W. Chemical synthesis of poliovirus cDNA: generation of infectious virus in the absence of natural template. Science. 2002;297:1016-8.
36. Weldon D. House Resolution 514 〈 http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=107_cong_bills& docid=f:hr514ih.txt.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: House of Representatives, July 26, 2002.
37. Couzin J. A call for restraint on biological data. Science 2002;297:749-51.
38. Cozzarelli NR. PNAS policy on publication of sensitive material in the life sciences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100:1463.
39. Malakoff D. Researchers urged to self-censor sensitive data. Science. 2003;299:321.
40. Radford T. Editors call for responsibility in publishing "dangerous" research. BMJ. 2003;326:411.
41. Journal Editors and Authors Group. Statement on scientific publication and security. Science 2003;299:1149.
42. Falkow S. "Statement on scientific publication and security" fails to provide necessary guidelines. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 5575.
43. Young N, Clubb D, Taylor L. Executive, legislative and regulatory actions affecting internationals in the university (in the post-9/11 environment) 〈http://www.aau.edu/resources/regulatory_update.pdf7rang;. Accessed 07/13/03. Washington, DC: American Association of Universities, August 19, 2002.
44. American Association of Universities. State department technology alert list: comparison of 2001 with 2002 〈 http://www.aau.edu/resources/tal.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association of Universities, 2003.
45. Ward D. Testimony in regard to dealing with foreign student and scholars in the age of terrorism: visa backlogs and tracking systems 〈 http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/mar26/ward.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, 2003.
46. Bush G. Homeland Security Presidential Directive-2 〈 http://fas.org/irp/offdocs/nspd/hspd-2.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC, October 29, 2001.
47. Mervis J. Panel would screen foreign scholars. Science. 2002;296: 1213-4.
48. House Committee on Science. Academic leaders concerned about backlog of students visas and problems with tracking of foreign students 〈http://www.house.gov/science/press/108/108-044.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, 2003.
49. Tilghman S. Testimony in regard to dealing with foreign students and scholars in the age of terrorism: visa backlogs and tracking systems. 〈http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/full03/mar26/tilghman.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: U.S. House Committee on Science, March 26, 2003.
50. Arnone M. College officials urge lawmakers to fix problems that security measures pose for foreign students 〈 http//chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/03/2003032701n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. March 27, 2003.
51. Powell C. Border security: waiver of personal appearance for nonimmigrant visa applicants. Revision to the regulations 〈 http://travel.state. gov/state136100.html〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: State Department, May 3, 2003.
52. Arnone M. State department is said to plan interviews with nearly all foreigners seeking visas 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/05/2003051901n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. May 19, 2003.
53. Arnone M. College groups ask secretary of state to postpone new interview requirements for visa applicants 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/06/2003061901n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. June 19, 2003.
54. Hasselmo N, Ward D, Margrath CP, Stewart D. Letter to Secretary Colin Powell. 〈 http://www.acenet.edu/washington/letters/2003/06june/Powell.pdf〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC, June 17, 2003.
55. Arnone M. State department puts foreign students and professors first in line for visa interviews. Chron Higher Educ Today's News July 3, 2003. http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/07/2003070301n.htm. Accessed 5 January 2004. Washington, DC, 2003.
56. Bhattacharjee Y. Visas eased for government grantees 〈 http://sciencenow. sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2003/701/3〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: AAAS, 2003.
57. Institute of International Education. Open Doors 2002 Report 〈http://opendoors.iienetwork.org/〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: Institute of International Education, 2003.
58. Stephan PE, Black GC, Adams JD, Levin SG. Survey of foreign recipients of U.S. Ph. D.'s. Science. 2002;295:2211-2.
59. National Science Foundation. Survey of Earned Doctorates. 〈http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/ssed/start.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, 2003.
60. Wilson R, Cox A. Terrorist attacks put academic freedom to the test. Chron Higher Educ. 2001;49:A12.
61. Walsh S. U. of South Florida accuses professor of links to terrorism and asks court to approve plan to fire him 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2002/08/2002082201n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. August 22, 2002.
62. American Association of University Professors. University of South Florida Report. February 12, 2003. 〈 http://www.aaup.org/Com-a/Institutions/USF.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors, 2003.
63. Walsh S. U. of South Florida violated professor's academic rights, report says. Chron Higher Educ. 2003;49:A13.
64. American Association of University Professors. Resolution condemning the administration of the University of South Florida 〈http://www.aaup. org/Com-a/Institutions/USFresol.htm〉. Accessed 13 July 2003. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors, 2003.
65. Suggs W. U. of South Florida is condemned, but not censured, by AAUP. Chron Higher Educ. 2003;49:A10.
66. Carnevale D. Association of Universities urges presidents to protect academic freedom in the face of war threats 〈 http://chronicle.com/prm/daily/2003/01/2003012003n.htm〉. Accessed 5 January 2004. Chron Higher Educ Today's News. January 20, 2003.
67. Galas DJ, Riggs H. Global science and U.S. security. Science. 2003; 300:1847.
68. Stephan P, Levin S. Exceptional contributions to US science by foreign-born and foreign-educated. Popul Res Policy Rev. 2001;20:59-79.
69. Johnson V. The perils of homeland security. When we hinder foreign students and scholars, we endanger our national security. Chron Higher Educ. 2003;49:B7.
70. Skolnikoff EB. Protecting university research amid national-security fears. Chron Higher Educ. 2002;48:B10.