Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients with varying degrees of anteroposterior and vertical dysplasias, Part 1. Cephalometrics

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 450-456

  Fogle, Laura L ^a   Southard, Karin A ^b   Southard, Thomas E ^b   Casko, John S ^b  

^a University of Iowa ^*

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALVEOLAR BONE; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ESTHETIC SURGERY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCISOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFT TISSUE; SYNDROME DELINEATION; TOOTH MALFORMATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; DIAGNOSIS-RELATED GROUPS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RETROGNATHISM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 1842426747     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Proffit W.R., Ackerman J.L. Diagnosis and treatment planning. Graber T.M., Vanarsdall R.L. Jr. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 1994;Mosby, St Louis.
2. Cohen S.E. The biology of Class II treatment. Am J Orthod. 59:1971;470-487.
3. Ghafari J., Shofer F.S., Jacobsson-Hunt U., Markowitz D.L., Laster L.L. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;51-61.
4. Keeling S.D., Wheeler T.T., King G.J., Garvan C.W., Cohen D.A., Cabassa S., et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;40-50.
5. Tulloch J.F., Phillips C., Proffit W.R. Benefit of early Class II treatment progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 113:1998;62-72.
6. Thomas P.M. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthognathic surgery in the treatment of mandibular deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 53:1995;579-587.
7. Steiner C.C. Cephalometrics in clinical practice. Angle Orthod. 29:1959;8-29.
8. Steiner C.C. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod. 46:1960;721-735.
9. Musich D.R. Orthodontics and orthognathic surgery: principles of combined treatment. Graber T.M., Vanarsdall R.L. Jr. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 1994;Mosby, St Louis.
10. Shelly A.D., Southard T.E., Southard K.A., Casko J.S., Jakobsen J.R., Fridrich K.L., et al. Evaluation of profile esthetic change with mandibular advancement surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 117:2000;630-637.
11. Mergen JL, Southard KA, Dawson DV, Fogle LL, Casko JS, Southard TE. Treatment outcomes of growing Class II Division 1 patients, part 2. Profile silhouette evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 (in press)
12. Reidel RA. A cephalometric roentgenographic study of the relation of the maxilla and associated parts to the cranial base in normal and malocclusion of the teeth [thesis]. Evanston (Ill): Northwestern University; 1948
13. McNamara J.A. A method of cephalometric evaluation. Am J Orthod. 86:1984;449-469.
14. Burstone C.J. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod. 44:1958;1-25.
15. Worms F.W., Isaacson R.J., Speidel T.M. Surgical orthodontic treatment planning profile analysis and mandibular surgery. Angle Orthod. 46:1976;1-25.
16. Merrifield L.L. The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod. 52:1966;804-822.
17. Epker B.N., Fish L.C. Dentofacial deformities, vol I. 1986;C.V. Mosby, St Louis.
18. Bernstein L. Esthetics in rhinoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 8:1975;705-715.
19. Scheideman G.B., Bell W.H., Legan H.L., Finn R.A., Reisch J.S. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod. 78:1980;404-420.
20. Fitzgerald J.P., Nanda R.S., Currier G.F. An evaluation of the nasolabial angle and the relative inclinations of the nose and upper lip. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 102:1992;328-334.
21. Holdaway R.A. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 84:1983;1-28.
22. Nanda R.S., Meng H., Kapila S., Goorhuis J. Growth changes in the soft tissue facial profile. Angle Orthod. 60:1990;177-190.