Design of an enablement process for on demand applications

IBM Systems Journal

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 190-203

  Chang, Kay ^a   Dasari, Anthony ^a   Madduri, Hari ^a   Mendoza, Alfredo ^a   Mims, John ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PROBLEM SOLVING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

INDEPENDENT SERVICE VENDORS (ISV); ON DEMAND SERVICES (ODS);

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 1842423693     PISSN: 00188670     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1147/sj.431.0190     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. S. Nickolas, IBM Framework for e-business: Application Hosting Services, developerWorks, IBM Corporation, http://www.ibm.com/developer.
2. G. Thickins, Utility Computing: The Next New IT Model (April 2003), http://www.utilitycomputing.com/news/258.asp.
3. IBM and Strategic Potential of Web Services, Assessing the Customer Experience, IDC, Framingham, MA (May 2002).
4. A. Gutierrez, e-business on demand: A Developer's Roadmap, developerWorks, IBM Corporation (February 2003), http://www.ibm.com/developer.
5. L. McCabe, Out of the Box: Top Nine Net-Native Software-as-Services Design Differentiators, Market Strategy Report, Summit Strategies, Inc. (September 2002).
6. A. Mizoras, In-house versus Outsourced: A System Dynamics Comparison, #27743, IDC, Framingham, MA (August 2002).
7. D. Gisolfi, Web Services Architect, Part 2: Models for Dynamic E-business (April 2001), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws- arc2.html.
8. The descriptions of UMI and the application framework and its implementation are all to be viewed as intended directions and not as commitments to be delivered in IBM products. The actual functions and features delivered in UMI releases may A vary considerably from what has been described or referenced in this paper.