Assessing the most powerful analysis method for school-based intervention studies with alcohol, tobacco, and other drug outcomes

Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 595-606

  Janega, Jessica B ^a   Murray, David M ^a   Varnell, Sherri P ^b   Blitstein, Jonathan L ^a   Birnbaum, Amanda S ^c   Lytle, Leslie A ^c  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

ATOD prevention; Group randomized trial; Intraclass correlation; Power; School based

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CANNABIS ADDICTION; CIGARETTE SMOKING; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEPRESSION; DRUG ABUSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; VIOLENCE;

ADOLESCENT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SMOKING; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;

EID: 1842422022     PISSN: 03064603     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Birnbaum A., Lytle L.A., Murray D.M., Story M., Perry C.L., Boutelle K.N. Survey development to assess correlates of young adolescents' eating. American Journal of Health Behavior. 26(4):2002;284-295.
2. Carolina Population Center National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. 1999;. [February 2000].
3. Cornfield J. Randomization by group: A formal analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology. 108(2):1978;100-102.
4. Doerfler L.A., Felner R.A., Rowlinson R.T., Raley P.A., Evans E. Depression in children and adolescents: A comparative analysis of the utility and construct validity of two assessment measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 56:1988;769-772.
5. Donner A., Klar N. Design and analysis of cluster randomization trials in health research. 2000;Arnold, London.
6. Feng Z., Diehr P., Yasui Y., Evans B., Beresford S., Koepsell T.D. Explaining community-level variance in group randomized trials. Statistics in Medicine. 18:1999;539-556.
7. Janega, J. B., Murray, D. M., Varnell, S. P., Blitstein, J. L., Birnbaum, A. S., & Lytle, L. A. (in press). Assessing intervention effects in a school-based nutrition intervention trial: Which analytic model is best?
8. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1996). National Survey Results on Drug Use from The Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1995. Vol. I, Secondary School Students, NIH Publication No. 96-4139. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
9. Kahn L., Kinchen S.A., Williams B.I., Ross J.G., Lowry R., Hill C.V., Grunbaum J.A., Blumson P.S., Collins J.L., Kolbe L.J. Youth risk behavior surveillance - United States, 1997. Journal of School Health. 68:1998;355-369.
10. Kish L. Survey sampling. 1965;Wiley, New York, NY.
11. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D. SAS system for MIXED models. 1996;SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
12. Lytle L.A., Perry C.L. Applying research and theory in program planning: An example from a nutrition education intervention. Health Promotion Practice. 2(1):2001;68-80.
13. Minnesota Department of Education Minnesota Student Survey Report 1989. 1989;Minnesota Department of Education, St. Paul, MN.
14. Murray D.M. Design and analysis of group-randomized trials. 1998;Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
15. Murray D.M., Alfano C.M., Zbikowski S.M., Padgett L.S., Robinson L.A., Klesges R. Intraclass correlation among measures related to cigarette use by adolescents: Estimates from an urban and largely African American cohort. Addictive Behaviors. 27(4):2002;509-527.
16. Murray D.M., Clark M.H., Wagenaar A.C. Intraclass correlations from a community-based alcohol prevention study: The effect of repeat observations on the same communities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. 61(6):2000;881-890.
17. Murray D.M., Hannan P.J. Planning for the appropriate analysis in school-based drug-use prevention studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 58(4):1990;458-468.
18. Murray D.M., Hannan P.J., Baker W.L. A Monte Carlo study of alternative responses to intraclass correlation in community trials: Is it ever possible to avoid Cornfield's penalties? Evaluation Review. 20(3):1996;313-337.
19. Murray D.M., Short B.J. Intraclass correlation among measures related to alcohol use by school aged adolescents: Estimates, correlates, and applications in intervention studies. Journal of Drug Education. 26(3):1996;207-230.
20. Murray D.M., Wolfinger R.D. Analysis issues in the evaluation of community trials: Progress toward solutions in SAS/STAT MIXED. Journal of Community Psychology. CSAP Special Issue:1994;140-154.
21. Pechacek T.F., Fox B.H., Murray D.M., Luepker R.V. Review of techniques for measurement of smoking behavior. Matarazzo J.D., Weiss S.M., Herd J.A., Miller N.E., Weiss S.M. Behavioral health: A handbook of health enhancement and disease prevention. 1984;729-754 Wiley, Canada.
22. Radloff L.S. The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement. 1:1977;385-401.
23. SAS Institute I. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8, vol. 1, 2, and 3. 1999;Author, Cary, NC.
24. Zucker D.M. An analysis of variance pitfall: The fixed effects analysis in a nested design. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 50:1990;731-738.