Systematically selecting an alternative to remediate soil contaminating groundwater

Remediation

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 43-56

  Elmore, Andrew Curtis ^a  

^a Woodward Clyde   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842388038     PISSN: 10515658     EISSN: 15206831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rem.3440060206     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Smith, L., and F. W. Schwartz. 1981. “Mass Transport, 2. Analysis of Uncertainty in Prediction.” Water Resour. Res. 17 (2).
2. Spanggord, R. J., T. Mill, R. W. Chou, W. R. Mabey, J. H. Smith, and S. Lee. 1980. Environmental Fate Studies on Certain Munition Wastewater Constituents. Final Report, Phase I Literature Review. Contract No. DAMD 17–78-C-8081. AD-A082 372. Menlo Park, California: SRI International.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1988. Guidance on Remedial Actions for Contaminated Groundwater at Superfund Sites. EPA/540/G-88/003. December.
4. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 1989. Determining Soil Response Action Levels Based on Potential Contaminant Migration to Groundwater: A Compendium of Examples. EPA/000/A-89/000. October.
5. Zheng, C., G. D. Bennet, and C. B. Andrews. 1991. “Analysis of Groundwater Remedial Alternatives at a Superfund Site.” Groundwater 29 (6) (November-December).