Paternity analysis in cases of father-daughter incest using multiallelic loci

Human Heredity

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 288-294

  Cifuenteso, Lucía ^a   Jorquerag, Hugo ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b Laboratorio de Biología Molecular   (Chile)

Author keywords

Incest; Multiallelic loci; Paternity; Paternity attribution; Paternity exclusion

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; DNA POLYMORPHISM; FATHER CHILD RELATION; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC MARKER; HUMAN; INCEST; MOTHER; PATERNITY TEST; PROBABILITY; PROGENY;

ALLELES; FATHER-CHILD RELATIONS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; INCEST; MALE; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTHER-CHILD RELATIONS; PATERNITY;

EID: 1842377453     PISSN: 00015652     EISSN: 14230062     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000154426     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Wiener AS, Lederer M, Polayes H: Chances of proving nonpaternity, considering multiple allelomorphic genes. J Immunol 1930; 19:259-281.
2. Neel J V, Schull WJ: Human Heredity. Chicago. The University of Chicago Press, 1966.
3. Ryman N, Chakraborty R: Evaluation of paternity testing data from the joint distribution of paternity index and rate of exclusion. Hereditas 1982;96:49-54.
4. Cifucntcs L, Cruz Coke R, Valenzuela C, Armanct L, Lyng C, Islas E: Métodos genéticos para exclusion y atribución de paternidad: Experiencia en 30 casos. Rev Méd Chile 1988:116:736-742.
5. Pena SDJ, Chakraborty R, Epplen JT, Jeffreys AJ: DNA fingerprinting: State of the Science. Basel. Birk-hâuser. 1993.
6. Hammond H, Jin L, Zhong Y, Caskey T, Chakraborty R: Evaluation of 13 short tandem repeat loci for use in personal identification applications. Am J Hum Genet 1994;55: 175-189.
7. Budowle B, Giusti AM, Waye JS, Baetchtel FS, Fourney RM, Dwight EA, Lawrence AP: Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of conti-nous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci for use in forensic comparisons. Am J Hum Genet 1991:48:841-855.
8. Sajantila A, Budowle B, Strom M, Johnsson V, Lukka M, Peltonen L, Ehnholm C: PCR amplification of alleles at the D1S80 locus: Comparison of a Finnish and North American Caucasian population sample and forensic casework evaluation. Am J Hum Genet 1992:50:816-825.
9. Li CC: First Course in population genetics. Pacific Grove, California Boxwood Press, 1976.
10. Wiener AS: Chances of proving non paternity with a system determined by triple allelic codominant genes. Am J Hum Genet 1968:20:279-282.
11. Selvin S: Probability of non-paternity determined by multiple allele codominant systems. Am J Hum Genet 1980:322:276-278
12. Valentin J: Exclusions and attributions of paternity: Practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics. Am J Hum Genet 1980:32: 420-431.
13. Chakraborty R, Ferrel RE: Paternity case analysis in inclusion probabilities in parentage testing. Arlington. American Association of Blood Banks. 1983.
14. Majumber PP, Nei M: A note on positive identification of paternity by using genetic markers. Hum Hered 1983:33:29-35.
15. Li CC, Sacks L: The derivation of joint distribution and correlation between relatives by the use of stochastic matrices. Biometrics 1954: 10:347-360.
16. Thompson EA: Estimation of relationships from genetic data: in Rao CR. Chakraborty R (eds): Handbook of Statistics 8. Amsterdam. North Holland. 1991. pp 255-269.