Temperature dependence of molecular conformation, dynamics, and chemical shift anisotropy of α,α-trehalose in D2O by NMR relaxation

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 119, Issue 6, 1997, Pages 1336-1345

  Batta, Gyula ^a,c   Kövér, Katalin E ^b   Gervay, Jacquelyn ^a   Hornyák, Miklós ^c   Roberts, Gareth M ^a  

^a University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

^c INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TREHALOSE;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE ANALYSIS; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; IN VITRO STUDY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

EID: 1842366056     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja962807q     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Nakagaki, M.; Nagase, H.; Ueda, H. J. Membr. Sci. 1992, 73, 173-180.
2. Crowe, J. H.; Carpenter, J. F.; Crowe, L. M.; Anchordoguy, T. J. Cryobiology 1990, 27, 219.
3. Crowe, J. H.; Crowe, L. M.; Chapman, D. Science 1984, 223, 701.
4. Kawai, H.; Sakurai, M.; Inoue, Y.; Chujo, R.; Kobayashi, S. Cryobiology 1992, 29, 599-606.
5. Duda, C. A.; Stevens, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7406. Duda, C. A.; Stevens, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8487.
6. Duda, C. A.; Stevens, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 7406. Duda, C. A.; Stevens, E. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 8487.
7. (a) Brown, G. M.; Rohrer, D. C.; Berking, B.; Beevers, C. A.; Gould, R. O.; Simpson, R. Acta Crystallogr. 1972, B28, 3145.
8. (b) Jeffrey, G. A.; Nanni, R. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 137, 21-30.
9. (a) Dowd, M. K.; Reilly, P. J.; French, A. D. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 102.
10. (b) Tvaroska, I.; Vaclavik, L. Carbohydr. Res. 1987, 160, 137-149. In ref 7b calculations were carried out with 2-(tetrahydropyran-2-yloxy)tetrahydropyran which is closely related to trehalose.
11. Batta, Gy.; Gervay, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 368-374.
12. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4546. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4559.
13. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4546. Lipari, G.; Szabo, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 4559.
14. Dellwo, M. J.; Wand, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4571.
15. Brüschweiler, R.; Case, D. A. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1994, 26, 27.
16. (a) Shimizu, H. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1964, 40, 3357.
17. (b) Mackor, E. L.; Maclean, C. J. Chem. Phys. 1966, 44, 64.
18. (c) Werbelow, L. G.; Grant, D. M. Adv. Magn. Reson. 1977, 9, 189.
19. (d) Void, R. L.; Void, R. R. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1978, 12, 79.
20. (e) Guéron, M.; Leroy, J. L.; Griffey, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7262.
21. (f) Keeler, J.; Sánchez-Ferrando J. Magn. Reson. 1987, 75, 96.
22. (g) Canet, D. Prog. NMR Spectrosc. 1989, 21, 237.
23. (h) Oschkinat, H.; Bermel, W. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 81, 220.
24. (i) Dalvit, C.; Bodenhausen, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1989, 161, 554.
25. (j) Liu, F.; Mayne, C. L.; Grant, D. M. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 84, 344.
26. (k) Boyd, J.; Hommel, U.; Campbell, I. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 175, 477.
27. (l) Chang, W.-T.; Wang, P.-L.; Duh, D.-M.; Hwang, L.-P. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 1343.
28. (m) Di Bari, L.; Kowalewski, J.; Bodenhausen, G. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 93, 7698.
29. (n) Werbelow, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6663. Dalvit, C. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 95, 410.
30. (n) Werbelow, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 6663. Dalvit, C. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 95, 410.
31. (o) Grant, D. M.; Mayne, C. L.; Liu, F.; Xiang, T. X. Chem. Rev. 1991, 91, 1591.
32. (p) Farrar, T. C.; Jablonsky, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9159.
33. (q) Kontaxis, G.; Muller, N.; Sterk, H. J. Magn. Reson. 1991, 92, 332.
34. (r) Tsai, C.-L.; Price, W. S.; Chang, Y.-C.; Perng, B.-C.; Hwang, L.-P. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 7546.
35. (s) Maler, L.; Kowalewski, J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1992, 192, 595.
36. (t) Trudeau, J. D.; Bohmann, J.; Farrar, T. C. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1993, 105, 151.
37. (u) Brown, R. A.; Grant, D. M. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1993, 105, 284.
38. (v) Poppe, L.; van Halbeek, H. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1993, 31, 665.
39. (w) Maler, L.; Di Bari, L.; Kowalewski, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 6244.
40. Jaccard, G.; Wimperis, S.; Bodenhausen, G. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1987, 138, 601.
41. 2 group. This is not surprising as buildup of multispin effects generally takes longer time for dipolarly coupled spins.
42. Fuson, M. M.; Belu, A. M. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. A 1994, 107, 1.
43. Bremi, T.; Ernst, M.; Ernst, R. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 9322-9334.
44. (a) Levitt, M. H.; DiBari, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 69, 3124.
45. (b) Levitt, M. H.; DiBari, L. Bull. Magn. Reson. 1993, 16, 94.
46. 33 principal axis is nearly parallel to the C-O bond, and the two other perpendicular principal values are shifted downfield by ca. 30-40 ppm. The axis assigned as Y declines from the CH bond by ca. 20°, and it has the highest principal value around 90 ppm. In accordance with solid state data, our preliminary results obtained by the comparison of Grant's solid state and our liquid state CSA data show that the "quasi" axis of the carbon shift tensors with respect to the CH bond in sucrose and Me α-D-glucopyranoside may be in between 10° and 35°.
47. McCain, D. C.; Markley J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4259.
48. (a) Clore, M. G.; Szabo, A.; Bax, A.; Kay, L. E.; Driscoll, P. C.; Gronenborn, A. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4989-4991.
49. (b) Barbato, G.; Ikura, M.; Kay, L. E.; Pastor, R. W.; Bax, A. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 5269-5278.
50. Hricovini, M.; Torri, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 268, 159-175.
51. Bock, K.; Defaye, J.; Driguez, H.; Bar-Guilloux, E. Eur. J. Biochem. 1983, 131, 595.
52. 13C]trehalose are identified by asterisks. NOE factors were calculated after appropriate normalization.
53. 13C split doublet of H1* partially saturates the Hl center lines.
54. (a) Noggle, J. H.; Schirmer The Nuclear Overhauser Effect - Chemical Applications; Academic Press: New York, 1971.
55. (b) Batta, Gy.; Kövér, K. E.; Mádi, Z. L. J. Magn. Reson. 1987. 73, 477.
56. 13C] Me α-D-glucopyranoside the H2-{H1} NOE was +10% at 200 MHz.
57. (d) Batta, Gy.; Kövér, K. E.; Gervay, J. J. Magn. Reson. Ser. B 1994, 103, 185-188.
58. Batta, Gy.; Kövér, K. E. Magn. Res. Chem. 1988, 26, 852.
59. Tvaroska, I.; Hricovini, M.; Petrakova, E. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 189, 359. Tvaroska, I.; Taravel, R. F. In Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1996, 51, 15-57. In fact, the uncertainty range of the interglycosidic dihedral angle is independent from the slight differences in parametrization of the pertinent Karplus curve. However, insufficient experimental data between 30° and 90° dihedral angles in the literature may have caused errors in parametrization and this can bias the mean value. A comparison with concurrent parameter sets showed that an additional ±5° error is possible. In other words, the accuracy of the measured dihedral angles is ca. ±10°, but the scatter caused by temperature changes in this study is within ±5°.
60. Tvaroska, I.; Hricovini, M.; Petrakova, E. Carbohydr. Res. 1989, 189, 359. Tvaroska, I.; Taravel, R. F. In Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1996, 51, 15-57. In fact, the uncertainty range of the interglycosidic dihedral angle is independent from the slight differences in parametrization of the pertinent Karplus curve. However, insufficient experimental data between 30° and 90° dihedral angles in the literature may have caused errors in parametrization and this can bias the mean value. A comparison with concurrent parameter sets showed that an additional ±5° error is possible. In other words, the accuracy of the measured dihedral angles is ca. ±10°, but the scatter caused by temperature changes in this study is within ±5°.
61. It is possible that the interglycosidic dihedral angle slightly opens (<2°) within this range upon cooling down the solution; however, this could not be proved unequivocally because of the broadening of C1 lines at low temperature.
62. (a) McCain, D. C.; Markley, J. L. J. Magn. Reson. 1987, 73, 244.
63. (b) Kovacs, H.; Bagley, S.; Kowalewski, J. J. Magn. Reson. 1989, 85, 530.
64. (c) van Halbeek, H.; Poppe, L. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1992, 30, 574.
65. (d) Bagley, S.; Kovacs, H.; Kowalewski, J.; Widmalm, G. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1992, 30, 733.
66. (e) Roy, R.; Tropper, F. D.; Williams, A. J. Can. J. Chem. 1993, 71, 1995.
67. (f) Hajduk, P. J.; Horita, D. A.; Lerner, L. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9196.
68. (g) Rutherford, T. J.; Partridge, J.; Weller, C. T.; Homans, S. W. Biochemistry 1993, 32, 12715.
69. (h) Girlich, D.; Ludeman, H.-D. Z. Naturforsch. 1993, 48c, 407.
70. (i) Kowalewski, J.; Widmalm, G. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 28.
71. Dais, P. In Adv. Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem. 1995, 51, 63-131.
72. (a) Hricovini, M.; Shah, R. N.; Carver, J. P. Biochemistry 1992, 31, 10018.
73. (b) Poppe, L.; van Halbeek, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 1092.
74. (a) Hardy, B. J.; Egan, W.; Wildmalm, G. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 149-160.
75. (b) Balling Engelsen, S.; Pérez, S.; Braccini, I.; Hervé du Penhoat, C. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16. 1096-1119.
76. (c) Balling Engelsen, S.; Hervé du Penhoat, C.; Pérez, S. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 13334-13351.
77. (d) Bouchemal-Chibani, N.; Braccini, I.; Hervé du Penhoat, C.; Michon, V. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 177-182.
78. (e) André, I.; Mazeau, K.; Taravel, E. F.; Tvaroska, I. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 189-198.
79. (f) Aida, M.; Sugawara, Y.; Oikawa, S.; Umemoto, K. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 1995, 17, 227-235.
80. (g) Koca, J.; Pérez, S.; Imberty, A. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16, 296-310.
81. It was shown in ref 4 that the number of unfreezable water molecules in trehalose is eight. It was suggested that this number must be proportional with the number of water molecules in the first hydration shell. For sucrose, for example, 25 water molecules are predicted in the first hydration shell (Engelsen, S. B.; Perez, S. Unpublished theoretical data).
82. 1 values is lower than 4%, and in most cases smaller than 2%. Qualitative trends in local correlation times and order parameters were found to be independent of the selection of anisotropic or isotropic model.
83. We acquired relaxation data at elevated temperatures as well, but when they are evaluated using the Lipari-Szabo method, limitations of that approach must be considered.
84. 2, and NOE data were acquired. More details can be found in the error analysis section.
85. Akke, M.; Brüschweiler, R.; Palmer, A. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9832-9833.
86. Such an extension can be justified. (Akke, M. Personal communication).
87. 2 is excluded since some data were unavailable and other fluctuations, e.g. OH groups, cannot be measured by this method.
88. In a molecular dynamics simulation study - with both pyranose rings kept rigid - it was suggested that trehalose function against water stress is probably not due to the modification of the properties of water. Necessarily, this theoretical work is unable to consider ring librational dynamics in trehalose. Donnamaria, M. C.; Howard, E. I.; Grigera, J. R. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday. Trans. 1994, 90, 2731-2735.
89. 1 and individual model-free parameters.
90. Kövér, K. E.; Mádi, Z.; Batta, Gy. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1991, 29, 619-624.
91. 2-6) ppm. The carbon shifts at deuterated positions were ca. 0.25-0.3 ppm upfield shifted with respect to normal trehalose.
92. 15N CSA in protected amino acids revealed that CSA may be a sensitive probe of H-bonding and solvation. Kövér, K. E.; Batta, Gy.; Gervay J.; Hruby, V. 13th European Experimental N.M.R. Conference, May 19-24, 1996, Paris, Abstract p 23.
93. Glaudemans, C. P. J.; Fletcher, H. G., Jr. Meth. Carbohydr. Chem. 1972, 5, 373. Schmidt, R. R.; Mitchel, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 821.
94. Glaudemans, C. P. J.; Fletcher, H. G., Jr. Meth. Carbohydr. Chem. 1972, 5, 373. Schmidt, R. R.; Mitchel, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25, 821.
95. Wegmann, B.; Schmidt, R. R. J. Carbohydr. Chem. 1992, 11, 255.
96. Pavia, A. A.; Rocheville, J. M.; Ung, S. N. Carbohydr. Res. 1980, 79, 79.
97. Lemieux, R. U.; Bauer, H. F. Can. J. Chem. 1954, 32, 340. Stewart, L. C.; Richtmyer, N. K.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 2059.
98. Lemieux, R. U.; Bauer, H. F. Can. J. Chem. 1954, 32, 340. Stewart, L. C.; Richtmyer, N. K.; Hudson, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1950, 72, 2059.
99. Although this compound has been reported in the literature, previous reports showed that more than 70% of 3-hydrido exchange occurred. By performing the reaction at reflux for only 4 h exchange at C-3 could be avoided. Abbate, S.; Giuseppina, C.; Naffi, A. Carbohydr. Res. 1991, 210, 1-12.
100. MATLAB Reference Guide. Math Works, Natick, MA, 1992.
101. Kowalewski, J.; Morris, G. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 47, 331. Kay, L. E.; Nicholson, L. K.; Delaglio, F.; Bax, A.; Torchia, D. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 97, 359. Palmer, A. G., III; Skelton, N. J.; Chazin, W. J.; Wright, P. E.; Rance, M. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75, 699.
102. Kowalewski, J.; Morris, G. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 47, 331. Kay, L. E.; Nicholson, L. K.; Delaglio, F.; Bax, A.; Torchia, D. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 97, 359. Palmer, A. G., III; Skelton, N. J.; Chazin, W. J.; Wright, P. E.; Rance, M. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75, 699.
103. Kowalewski, J.; Morris, G. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1982, 47, 331. Kay, L. E.; Nicholson, L. K.; Delaglio, F.; Bax, A.; Torchia, D. A. J. Magn. Reson. 1992, 97, 359. Palmer, A. G., III; Skelton, N. J.; Chazin, W. J.; Wright, P. E.; Rance, M. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75, 699.