Visual reinforcement audiometry. Comparison of loudspeaker arrangements

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 247-251

  Magnusson, Lennart ^a   Börjesson, Eva ^a   Axelsson, Ann Charlotte ^a  

^a SAHLGRENSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Acoustics; Audiometry; Children; Sound field; Sound localization

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; AUDIOMETRY; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; LOUDNESS; MONAURAL HEARING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SOUND PRESSURE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 1842328671     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/01050399709048015     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Arlinger SD, Jerlvall LB. Reliability in warble-tone sound field audiometry. Scand Audiol 1987; 16: 21-7.
2. Culpepper B, Thompson G. Effect of reinforcer duration on the response behaviour of preterm 2-year-olds in visual reinforcement audiometry. Ear Hear 1994; 15: 161-7.
3. ISO 8253-2, Audiometric test methods - part 2: Sound field audiometry with pure tone and narrow band signals. 1992.
4. Lidén G, Kankkunen A. Visual reinforcement audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol 1969; 89: 865-72.
5. Moore JM, Thompson G, Thompson M. Auditory localization of infants as a function of reinforcement condition. J Speech Hear Disord 1974; 40: 29-34.
6. Thompson M, Thompson G, Vethivelu S. A comparison of audiometric test methods for 2-year-old children. J Speech Hear Disord 1989; 54: 174-9.
7. Walker G, Dillon H, Byrne D. Sound field audiometry: recommended stimuli and procedures. Ear Hear 1984; 5: 13-21.