IUGR detection by ultrasonographic examinations using neural networks

IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 55-58

  Gürgen, Fikret ^a   Önal, Emrah ^a   Varol, Füsun G ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b TRAKYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; BACKPROPAGATION; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE; ULTRASONIC IMAGING;

BIPARIETAL DIAMETER (BPD); HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE (HC); INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION (IUGR); SIGMOIDAL BASIS FUNCTIONS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

FETAL MONITORING;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE GROWTH RETARDATION;

ABDOMEN; ALGORITHMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EMBRYONIC AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FETAL GROWTH RETARDATION; FORECASTING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HEAD; HUMANS; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 1842290995     PISSN: 07395175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/51.585518     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Chudleigh P and Pearce JM: Obstetric ultrasound: how, why and when, Newyork, Churchill Livingstone, 1986.
2. Crouse DT, Cassady G: The Small-for-Gestational-Age Infant, Neonatalogy: Pathophysiology and Management of Newborn, Fourth Edition, Ed. by G.B. Avery, M.A. Fletcher, and M. G. MacDonald, J.B. Lippincott Comp., Philadelphia, 1994.
3. Farmer RM, et al.: The use of a neural network for the ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight in the macrosomic fetus, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., Vol. 16, No. 5, pp. 1467-1472, 1992.
4. Gabbe SG, Iams JD: Intrauterine Growth Retardation, Chapter 12, Ob/Gyn by Zuspan F., Iams Jay, pp. 165-172, Mosby Publ., USA, 1991.
5. Gallivan S, Robson SC, Chang TC, Vaughan J, Spencer JAD: An investigation of fetal growth using serial ultrasound data. Obstet Gynecol, 3, pp 109-114, 1993.
6. Ghrgen F S, Sihmanoglu M, Varol FG: The assessment of LH surge for predicting ovulation time using clinical, hormonal and ultrasonic indices in infertile women with an ensemble of neural networks, Comp. Biol. Med. Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 405-413, 1995.
7. Ghrgen FS, Alpaydin R, gnlhakin U, Alpaydin E: Distributed and local neural classifiers for phoneme recognition, Pattern Recognition Letters 15, pp. 1111-1118, 1994.
8. Hedriana HL and Moore TR: A comparison of single versus multiple growth ultrasonographic examinations in predicting birth weight, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., Vol. 170, No. 6, pp. 1600-1606, 1994.
9. Hirata GI, Medearis AL, Horenstein J, Bear MB, Platt LD: Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight using real-time ultrasound, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecology, 162, pp. 238-242, 1990.
10. Pedersen JF, Molsted-Pedersen L: Sonographic estimation of fetal weight in diabetic pregnancy, Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 99, pp. 475-478, 1992.
11. Shepard MJ, Richards VA, Berkowitz RL, Warsof SL, Hobbins JC: An evaluation of two equations for predicting fetal weight by ultrasound, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 142, pp. 47-54, 1982.
12. Shields LE, Huff RW, Jackson GM, Olive DL, Patterson RM: Fetal growth: a comparison of curves with mathematical modeling, J. Ultrasound Med., 5, pp. 271-274, 1993.
13. Smagt P and Van Der P: Minimisation Methods for Training Feedforward Neural Networks, Neural Networks, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 1-11, 1994.
14. Warsof SL, Gohari P, Berkowitz RL, Hobbins JC: The estimation of fetal-weight by computer assisted analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 128, pp. 881-892, 1977.