Update of safety and environmental issues for fusion

Fusion Engineering and Design

Volumn 51-52, Issue , 2000, Pages 419-427

  Gulden, W ^a   Cook, I ^b   Marbach, G ^c   Raeder, J ^d   Petti, D ^e   Seki, Y ^f  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR PLASMAPHYSIK   (Germany)

^b CULHAM SCIENCE CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^c IRFM   (France)

^d International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor ITER Garching   (Germany)

^e IDAHO NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^f JAPAN ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXPERIMENTAL REACTORS; NUCLEAR MATERIALS SAFEGUARDS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

INTERNATIONAL THERMONUCLEAR EXPERIMENTAL REACTOR (ITER);

FUSION REACTORS;

EID: 18344399348     PISSN: 09203796     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0920-3796(00)00288-X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. J. Raeder et al., Safety and environmental assessment of fusion power (SEAFP): report of the SEAFP project, EURFUBRU XII-217/95, Brussels: European Commission, 1995.
2. I. Cook et al., Results, Conclusions, and Implications of the SEAFP-2 Programme, this conference.
3. W. Gulden et al., Safety and environmental assessment of fusion power-long term programme (SEAL), Summary Report of the SEAL Project, European Commission, EUR-19071, Brussels, April 1999.
4. Najmabadi F., et al. Overview of the ARIES-RS reversed-shear tokamak power plant study. Fusion Eng. Design. 38:1998;3-25.
5. S. Nishio et al., Maintenance Oriented Tokamak Reactor with Low Activation Material, Fusion Energy 1996, Proc. 16th International Conferenc on Fusion Energy, Vol. 3, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1997, pp. 693-699.
6. Gulden W., Raeder J., Cook I. SEAFP and SEAL: Safety and environmental aspects presented at ISFNT-4. Fus. Eng. Des. 51-52:2000;429-434.
7. P. Berbey, consolidating the european utility requirement document, 7th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering, Tokyo, April 19-23, 1999, ICONE-7009, to be published in JSME.
8. Technical Basis for the ITER Final Design Report, Cost Review and Safety Analysis (FDR), ITER EDA Documentation Series No. 16, IAEA, Vienna, 1998.
9. U. Colombo et al., evaluation of the community fusion programme (1984-1990), Research evaluation-Report No. 45, EUR 13104 EN, July 1990.
10. ITER detailed technical objectives in: ITER Council Proceedings 1993, NSV Attachment 1.
11. ITER non-site specific safety report (NSSR-2), Executive Summary, December 19, 1997.
12. Petti D.A., et al. An overview of safety and environmental considerations in the selection of materials for fusion facilities. J. Nucl. Mater. 233-237:1996;37.
13. Seki Y., et al. Impact of low activation materials on fusion reactor design. J. Nucl. Mater. 258-263:1998;1791-1797.
14. Seki Y., et al. Effect of activation cross section change on the shallow land burial fraction of low activation materials for fusion reactors. Fus. Tech. 34:(3(2)):1998;353-357.
15. Noda T. Evaluation of transmutation and low induced radioactivity and requirement for candidate structural materials. J. Nucl. Mater. 233-237:1996;1475-1480.
16. Steiner D., et al. ARIES-RS Saf. Design Anal. 38:1997;189-218.
17. Licensing Requirements for Land Disposal of Radioactive Waste, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 10CFR part 61, US Federal Register, FR, 47 (1982) 57-446.
18. Fetter S., et al. Long term radioactive waste from fusion reactors: part II. Fusion Eng. Design. 13:1990;239.
19. Recommended radiological protection criteria for recycling of metals from the dismantling of nuclear installations. CEC Radiation Protection 89, Luxembourg, 1998.
20. Clearance levels for radionuclides in solid materials. Application of exemption principles. Interim report for comment. IAEA TECDOC-855, Vienna, January 1996.