Robotic and navigation systems: Surgical practicability and benefit for the patient?;Roboter- und navigationssysteme: Praktikabilität für den operateur - Nutzen für den patienten?

Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 227-231

  Dotzel, V ^a   Wetzel, D ^a   Wilhelm, D ^a   Schneider, A ^a   Wessels, G ^a   Feussner, H ^a,b  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Master slave systems; Navigation; Robotics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; ROBOTICS; SIMULATION; TREATMENT PLANNING;

DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; LIVER NEOPLASMS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 18344397475     PISSN: 0044409X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38537     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordon A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Proc. 11th Ann. SMIT, Boston, USA 1999
2. Ballester P, Jain Y, Hylett KR, McCloy RF. Comparison of task performance of robotic camera holders. Endoassist and Aesop 2001; Proc 13th. Conf. SMIH
3. Birke A, Reichel H, Hein W et al. ROBODOC - a path into the future of hip endoprosthetics or an investment error? Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138 (5): 395-401
4. Börner M, Bauer A, Lahmer A. Computer-guided robot-assisted hip endoprosthesis. Orthopäde 1997; 26 (3): 251-257
5. Casals A, Amat J, Laporte E. Robotic aids for laparoscopic surgery problems. Proc. Robotic Research 7. Int. Symp., Hersching, Germany 1995
6. Dirksen CD, Ament AJ, Adang EM et al. Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic repair for primary inguinal hernia. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1998; 14 (3): 472-483
7. Esumi G, Tomikawa M, Hashizume M et al. Current status and future of surgical robotic systems. Fukuoka Igaku Zasshi 2001; 92 (9): 315-318
8. Gebhard F, Kinzl L, Arand M. Limits of CT-based computer navigation in spinal surgery. Unfallchirurg 2000; 103 (8): 696-701
9. Gebhard F, Arand M, Fleiter T et al. Computer-assisted surgery: developments and prospects in 2001. Results of a workshop at Schloss Reisenburg, 23-24 November 2000. Unfallchirurg 2001; 104 (8): 782-788
10. Hanisch E, Markus B, Gutt C et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy and fundoplication - initial experiences with the Da Vinci system. Chirurg 2001; 72 (3): 286-288
11. Harms J, Feussner H, Baumgartner M et al. Three-dimensional navigated laparoscopic ultrasonography: first experiences with a new minimally invasive diagnostic device. Surg Endosc 2001; 15 (12): 1459-1462
12. Hassfeld S, Muhling J. Comparative examination of the accuracy of a mechanical and an optical system in CT and MRT based instrument navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 29 (6): 400-407
13. Hassfeld S, Zoller J, Albert FK et al. Preoperative planning and intraoperative navigation in skull base surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998; 26 (4): 220-225
14. Högemann D, Stamm G, Shin H, Oldhafer KJ, Schlitt HJ, Selle D, Peitgen HO. Individuelle Planung leberchirurgischer Eingriffe an einem virtuellen Modell der Leber und ihrer Leitstrukturen. Radiologe 2000; 40 (3): 267-273
15. Jaspers JE, Den Boer KT, Sjoerdsma W et al. Design and feasibility of PASSIST, a passive instrument positioner. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A (United States) 2000; 10 (6): 331-335
16. Jerosch J, von Hasselbach C, Filler T et al. Increasing the quality of pre-operative planning and intraoperative application of computer-assisted systems and surgical robots - an experimental study. Chirurg 1998; 69 (9): 973-976
17. Kim VB, Chapman WH, Albrecht RJ, Bailey BM, Young JA, Nifong LW, Chitwood WR. Early experience with telemanipulative robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy using DaVinci. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002; 12 (1): 33-40
18. Marescaux J. Code name: "Lindbergh operation". Ann Chir 2002; 127 (1): 2-4
19. Messmer P, Baumann B, Suhm N et al. Navigation systems for imageguided therapy: a review. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2001; 173 (9): 777-784
20. Niebuhr H, Born O. Image tracking system. A new technique for safe and cost-saving laparoscopic operation. Chirurg 2000; 71 (5): 580-584
21. Okoniewski M, Birke A, Schietsch U et al. Early results of a prospective study in patients with computer-assisted femur shaft preparation in total hip endoprosthesis implantation (robodoc system) - indications, outcome, complications. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2000; 138 (6): 510-514
22. Omote K, Feussner H, Ungeheuer A, Arbter K, Guo-Quing W, Siewert JR. Self guided robotic camera control for laparoscopic surgery compared with human camera control. Am J Surg 1999; 177: 321-324
23. Paul A. Surgical robot in endoprosthetics. How CASPAR assists on the hip. MMW Fortschr Med 1999; 141 (33): 18
24. Pott P, Schwarz M. Robots, navigation, telesurgery: state of the art and market overview. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2002; 140 (2): 218-231
25. Rassweiler J, Frede T. Geometrie der Laparoskopie, Telechirurgie, Training und Telementoring. Urologe A 2002; 41 (2): 131-143
26. Songsak K. New release of the boonpong laparoscopic camera holder. Aust N Z J Surg 1999; 69: 141-143
27. Sung GT, Gill IS. Robotic laparoscopic surgery: a comparison of the DaVinci and Zeus systems. Urology 2001; 58 (6): 893-898
28. Yavuz Y, Ystgaard B, Skogvoll E, Marvik R. A comparative experimental study evaluating the performance of surgical robots. Aesop and Endosista. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2000; 10: 163-167