Type I error rates for a one factor within-subjects design with missing values

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 406-416

  Padilla, Miguel A ^a   Algina, James ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Department of Educational Psychology ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Kenward Roger omnibus test; Missing values; Robustness; Type I error; Within subjects

Indexed keywords

EID: 18344363032     PISSN: 15389472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1099267980     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albert, P. S., & Follmann, D. A. (2000). Modeling repeated count data subject to information dropout. Biometrics, 56, 667-677.
2. Bradley, J. (1978). Robustness? British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
3. Diggle, P. D., & Keward, M. G. (1994). Informative dropout in longitudinal data analysis. Applied Statistics, 43, 49-93.
4. Efron, B., & Hinkley, D. V. (1978). Assesing the accuracy of the maximum likelihood estimator: Observed versus expected Fisher information. Biometrika, 65, 457-481.
5. Fai, H. T., & Cornelius, P. L. (1996). Approximate F-tests for multiple degree of freedom hypotheses in generalized least squares analyses of unbalanced split-plot experiments. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 54, 363-378.
6. Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Shneyer, L. (2001). An alternative parameterization of the general linear mixture model for longitudinal data with non-ignorable drop-outs. Statistics in Medicine, 20, 1009-1021.
7. Harville, D. A., & Jeske, D. R. (1992). Mean squared error of estimation or prediction under a general linear model. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 724-731.
8. Heitjan, D. F. (1994). Ignorability in general incomplete-data models. Biometrika, 81, 701-708.
9. Kenward, M. G. (1998). Selection models for repeated measurements with non-random dropout: An illustration of sensitivity. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 2723-2732.
10. Kenward, M. G., & Molenberghs, G. (1998). Likelihood based frequentist inference when data are missing at random. Statistical Science, 13, 236-247.
11. Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983-997.
12. Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1112-1121.
13. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
15. McBride, G. B. (2002). Statistical methods helping and hindering environmental science and management. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 300-305.
16. Rubin , D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581-592.
17. Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Schaalje, G. B., McBride, J. B., & Fellingham, G. W. (2002). Adequacy of approximations to distributions of test statistics in complex mixed linear models. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 7, 512-524.
19. Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall.
20. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: A data analyst's perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
21. Troxel, A. B. (1998). Analysis of longitudinal data with non-ignorable non-monotone missing values. Applied Statistics, 47, 425-438.
22. Verbeke, G., & Molenbergh, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Wolfinger, R. D., & Chang, M. (1995). Comparing the SAS GLM and Mixed procedures for repeated measures. Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual SAS Users Groups Conference.