Retinal correspondence of monocular receptive fields in disparity-sensitive complex cells from area V1 in the awake monkey

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 1533-1539

  Perez, Rogelio ^a,c   Castro, Adrian F ^a   Justo, Maria S ^a   Bermudez, Maria A ^a   Gonzalez, Francisco ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO   (Spain)

^c Hospital de Monforte de Lemos   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DARKNESS; MACACA; MONKEY; NONHUMAN; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA RECEPTIVE FIELD; SINGLE UNIT ACTIVITY; STEREORADIOGRAPHY; VISUAL CORTEX; WAKEFULNESS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MICROELECTRODE; MONOCULAR VISION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANIMALS; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MACACA MULATTA; MICROELECTRODES; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, MONOCULAR; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 18244403544     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1061     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Pierce DM, Benton AL. Relationship between monocular and binocular depth acuity. Ophthalmologica. 1975;170:43-50.
2. Howard IP, Rogers BJ. Binocular Vision and Stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.
3. Wheatstone C. Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part I. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Phil Trans Roy Soc. 1838;128:371-394.
4. Aschenbrenner CM. Problems in getting information into and out of air photographs. Photogramm Eng. 1954;20:398-401.
5. Julesz B. Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns. Bell Syst Tech J. 1960;39:1125-1162.
6. Barlow HB, Blakemore C, Pettigrew JD. The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. J Physiol (Lond). 1967;193:327-342.
7. Pettigrew JD, Nikara T, Bishop PO. Binocular interaction on single units in cat striate cortex: simultaneous stimulation by single moving slit with receptive fields in correspondence. Exp Brain Res. 1968;6:391-410.
8. Poggio GF, Fischer B. Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity of striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1977;40:1392-1405.
9. Joshua DE, Bishop PO. Binocular single vision and depth discrimination: receptive field disparities for central peripheral vision and binocular interaction on peripheral single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1970;10:389-416.
10. Maske R. Yamane S, Bishop PO. Binocular simple cells for local stereopsis: comparison of receptive field organizations of the two eyes. Vision Res. 1984:24;1921-1929.
11. Nomura M, Matsumoto S, Fujiwara S. A binocular model for the simple cell. Biol Cybern. 1990;63:237-242.
12. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors. Science. 1990;249:1037-1041.
13. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by simple cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1779-1805.
14. Ohzawa I. DeAngelis GC, Freeman R. The neural coding of stereoscopic depth. Neuroreport. 1997;8:3-12.
15. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1997;77:2879-2909.
16. Wagner H, Frost B. Disparity-sensitivity cells in the owl have a characteristic disparity. Nature. 1993;364:796-798.
17. Qian N. Computing stereodisparity and motion with known binocular cell properties. Neural Comput. 1994;6:390-404.
18. Qian N. Binocular disparity and the perception of depth. Neuron. 1997;18:359-368.
19. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freemann RD. Neuronal mechanisms underlying stereopsis: how do simple cells in the visual cortex encode binocular disparity?. Perception. 1995;24:3-31.
20. Zhu Y, Qian N. Binocular receptive field models, disparity tuning, and characteristic disparity. Neural Comput. 1996;8:1611-1641.
21. Qian N, Zhu Y. Physiological computation of binocular disparity. Vision Res. 1997;37:1811-1827.
22. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms underlying binocular fusion and stereopsis: position vs. phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997;94:5438-5443.
23. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for encoding binocular disparity: receptive field position versus phase. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:874-890.
24. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information. I. Simple cells. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:891-908.
25. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information. II. Complex cells. J Neurophysiol. 1999;82:909-924.
26. Gonzalez F, Ferez R. Neural mechanisms underlying stereoscopic vision. Prog Neurobiol. 1998;55:191-224.
27. Ohzawa I. Mechanisms of stereoscopic vision: the disparity energy model. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1998;8:509-515.
28. Livingstone MS, Tsao DY. Receptive fields of disparity-selective neurons in macaque striate cortex. Nat Neurosci. 1999;2:825-832.
29. DeAngelis G. Seeing in three dimensions: the neurophysiology of stereopsis. Trends in Cognit Sci. 2000;4:80-99.
30. Nikara T, Bishop PO, Pettigrew JD. Analysis of retinal correspondence by studying receptive fields of binocular single units in cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1968;6:353-372.
31. von der Heydt R, Adorjani C, Hanny P, Baumgartner G. Disparity- sensitivity and receptive field incongruity of units in the cat striate cortex. Exp Brain Res. 1978;31:523-545.
32. DeValois RL, DeValois KK. Spatial Vision. New York: Oxford University Press; 1988.
33. Fleet DJ, Wagner H, Heeger DJ. Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts. Vision Res. 1996;36:1839-1857.
34. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 1968;195:215-243.
35. Tsao DY, Conway BR. Livingstone MS. Receptive fields of disparity-tuned simple cells in macaque V1. Neuron. 2003;38:103-114.
36. Gonzalez F, Krause F, Ferez R, Alonso JM, Acuña C. Binocular matching in monkey visual cortex: single cell responses to correlated and uncorrelated dynamic random dot stereograms. Neuroscience. 1993;52:933-939.
37. Gonzalez F, Krause F. Generation of dynamic random-element stereograms in real time with a system based on a personal computer. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1994;32:373-376.
38. DeBoer E, Kuyper P. Triggered correlation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1968;15:69-179.
39. Jones JP, Palmer LA. The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in the cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1987;58:1187-1211.
40. Dow BM, Vauntin RG, Bauer R. The mapping of visual space onto the foveal striate cortex in the macaque monkey. J Neurosci. 1985;5:890-902.
41. Citron MC, Kroeker JP, McCann GD. Nonlinear interactions in ganglion cell receptive fields. J Neurophysiol. 1981;46:1161-1176.
42. Reid RC, Shapley RM. Spatial structure of cone inputs to receptive fields in primate lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature. 1992;356:716-718.
43. DeAngelis GC, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD. Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. I. General characteristics and postnatal development. J Neurophysiol. 1993;69:1091-1117.
44. Reid RC, Victor JD, Shapley RM. The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: linear receptive field properties. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:1015-1027.
45. Poggio GF, Gonzalez F, Krause F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity. J Neurosci. 1988;8:4531-4550.
46. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond). 1962;l60:106-154.
47. Koch C, Poggio T. Biophysics of computational systems: neurons, synapsis and membranes. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM, eds. Synaptic Function. New York: Wiley; 1987:637-697.
48. Mel BW, Ruderman DL, Archie KA. Translation-invariant orientation tuning in visual "complex" cells could derive from intradendritic computations. J Neurosci. 1998;18:4325-4334.
49. Gonzalez F, Alonso JM, Relova JL, Perez R. Receptive field asymmetries and sensitivity to random dot stereograms. Arch Ital Biol. 1996;134:l68-184.