Taking well-child care into the 21st century: A novel, effective method for improving parent knowledge using computerized tutorials

Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine

Volumn 159, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 482-485

  Sanghavi, Darshak M ^a  

^a BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTIPYRETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CAR; CHILD CARE; CHILD NUTRITION; CHILD PARENT RELATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARE; FEVER; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PARENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SLEEP; TRAVEL; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; COMPUTERS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INFANT; NEW MEXICO; PARENTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE;

EID: 18244393722     PISSN: 10724710     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.159.5.482     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People: The Surgeon General's Report on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1979.
2. Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress. Healthy Children: investing in the Future. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1988. Publication OTA-H-345.
3. Chamberlin RW, Szumowski EK. A follow-up study of parent education in pediatric office practices: impact at age two and a half. Am J Public Health. 1980; 70:1180-1188.
4. Casey PH, Whitt JK. Effect of the pediatrician on the mother-infant relationship. Pediatrics. 1980;65:815-820.
5. Schuster MA, Duan N, Regalado M, Klein DJ. Anticipatory guidance: what information do parents receive? What information do they want? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1191-1198.
6. American Medical Association Center for Health Policy Research. Socioeconomic Characteristics of Medical Practice. Chicago, Ill: Center for Health Policy Research; 1983.
7. Reisinger KS, Bires JA. Anticipatory guidance in pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 1980;66:889-892.
8. Glascoe FP, Oberklaid F, Dworkin PH, Trimm F. Brief approaches to educating patients and parents in primary care. Pediatrics. 1998;101:E10.
9. Green M, Palfrey J, eds. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents. 2nd ed. Arlington, Va: National Center for Education in Maternal and Child Health; 2000.
10. Sechrest RC, Henry DJ. Computer-based patient education: observations on effective communication in the clinical setting. J Biocommun. 1996;23:8-12.
11. Krishna S, Balas EA, Spencer DC, Griffin JZ, Boren SA. Clinical trials of interactive computerized patient education: implications for family practice. J Fam Pract. 1997;45:25-33.
12. Wright BJ, Turner JG, Daffin P. Effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in increasing the rate of universal precautions-related behaviors. Am J Infect Control. 1997;25:426-429.
13. Tronni C, Welebob E. End-user satisfaction of a patient education tool manual versus computer-generated tool. Comput Nurs. 1996;14:235-238.
14. Consoli SM, Ben Said M, Jean J, Menard J, Plouin PF, Chatellier G. Benefits of a computer-assisted education program for hypertensive patients compared with standard education tools. Patient Educ Courts. 1995;26:343-347.
15. Paperny DM. Computerized health assessment and education for adolescent HIV and STD prevention in health care settings and schools. Health Educ Behav. 1997; 24:54-70.