A process perspective of international research collaboration

Journal of Employment Counseling

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 88-97

  Stead, Graham B ^a   Harrington, Thomas F ^b  

^a VISTA UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18244392741     PISSN: 00220787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-1920.2000.tb00826.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Adair, J. G. (1992). Empirical studies of indigenization and development of the discipline in developing countries. In S. Iwawaki, Y. Kashima, & K. Leung (Eds.), Innovations in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 62-74). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
2. American Psychological Association. (1992). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
3. Bedward, M. V., & Andersen, M. V. (1992). Crowing your business internationally: How to form profitable overseas partnerships, alliances and joint ventures. Chicago: Probus.
4. Brislin, R. W., & Hughes-Wiener, G. (1989). Collaborative research: The anticipation of potential difficulties. In D. M. Keats, D. Munro, & L. Mann (Eds.), Heterogeneity in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 104-121). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
5. Holland, J. L. (1991). The difference between a journal article and a complete intellectual and psychological report: A frank account of how one small project was born, executed, and reported. Journal of Career Development, 18, 101-109.
6. Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In J. W. Berry, Y. H. Poortinga, & J. Pandey (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 129-169). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.