Impedance description of coherent synchrotron radiation with account of bunch deformation

Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 95-105

  Warnock, Robert ^a   Ruth, Ronald ^a   Venturini, Marco ^b   Ellison, James A ^c  

^a SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 18244387439     PISSN: 10984402     EISSN: 10984402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.014402     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. B. W. Zotter and S. Kheifets, Impedances and Wakes in High Energy Particle Accelerators (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
2. M. Venturini, R. Warnock, R. Ruth, and J. A. Ellison, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 8, 014202 (2005).
3. M. Venturini and R. Warnock, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 224802 (2002).
4. R. Warnock and M. Venturini, in Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Portland, OR, 2003 (IEEE, Piscatway, NJ, 2003), p. 3144, paper RPPB061.
5. G. B. Folland, Fourier Analysis and Its Applications (Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, CA, 1992).
6. J. Schwinger, "On Radiation by Electrons in a Betatron," unpublished report, 1945, transcribed in Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Report No. LBL-39088, 1996.
7. J. Nodvick and D. Saxon, Phys. Rev. 96, 180 (1954).
8. R. Warnock and P. Morton, Part. Accel. 25, 113 (1990).
9. R. L. Warnock, G. R. Bart, and S. Fenster, Part. Accel. 12, 179 (1982).
10. Handbook of Mathematical Functions, edited by M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Applied Mathematics Series Vol. 55 (National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, 1972).
11. Higher Transcendental Functions, edited by A. Erdélyi et al., Bateman Manuscript Project Vol. II (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1953).
12. ν appears erroneously in Eqs. (19a) and (20a), whereas it appears correctly in Eqs. (19) and (20). Note also that Rez > 0 is implied in (19) and (20), whereas the change of variable and rotation of direction of integration to obtain (19a) and (20a) accomplishes an analytic continuation that relaxes that condition.
13. G. A. Decker, Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, 1986.
14. K.-Y. Ng and R. Warnock, Phys. Rev. D 40, 231 (1989). Note the following corrections: in the sentence following Eq. (3.12) omit "large; in Eq. (3.16) replace the initial minus sign by plus.
15. R. Warnock, in Proceedings of the IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference, San Francisco, CA, 1991 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 1991), p. 1824.
16. J. Murphy, S. Krinsky, and R. Gluckstern, Part. Accel. 57, 9 (1997).