Measurement of hurst exponents for semiconductor laser phase dynamics

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2005, Pages

  Lam, Wing Shun ^a,b   Ray, Will ^a,b   Guzdar, Parvez N ^b   Roy, Rajarshi ^a,b  

^a Bldg 142   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HURST EXPONENTS; LASER PHASE DYNAMICS; LORENTZ MODEL; OPTICAL FEEDBACK;

BROWNIAN MOVEMENT; CHAOS THEORY; CHARGE CARRIERS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; OSCILLATORS (ELECTRONIC); PARTICLE BEAM DYNAMICS; PHOTONS; SPURIOUS SIGNAL NOISE;

SEMICONDUCTOR LASERS;

EID: 18244383062     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.010602     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. D. Gabor, J. IEE (London) 93, 429 (1946); M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999), 7th ed., pp. 557-562.
2. D. Gabor, J. IEE (London) 93, 429 (1946); M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1999), 7th ed., pp. 557-562.
3. M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996).
4. A. S. Pikovsky, M. G. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2001).
5. T. Yalçinkaya and Y. C. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3885 (1997).
6. N. E. Huang et al., Proc. R. Soc. London A 454, 903 (1998).
7. (a) H. E. Hurst, R. P. Black, and Y. M. Simaika, Long-Term Storage: An Experimental Study (Constable, London, 1965);
8. (b) P. Addison, Fractals and Chaos (Inst. of Phys. Pub., London, 1997), Chap. 4.
9. J. Ohtsubo, Prog. Opt., edited by E. Wolf (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2002), Vol. 44, p. 1.
10. D. Lenstra, B. H. Verbeek, and A. J. Den Boef, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 21, 674 (1985).
11. W. S. Lam, P. N. Guzdar, and R. Roy, Phys. Rev. E 67, 025604(R) (2003).
12. c = 0.29. K. Tatah and E. Garmire, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 25, 1800 (1989).
13. Y. C. Lai and N. Ye, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 13, 1383 (2003).
14. The EMD process only approximates the conditions of proper rotation for each IMF. Details of EMD statistical analysis may be found in N. E. Huang et al., Proc. R. Soc. London A 459, 2317 (2003).
15. C. Masoller and N. B. Abraham, Phys. Rev. A 57, 1313 (1998).
16. R. Lang and K. Kobayashi, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 16, 347 (1980).