An institutional review of the value of computed tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac malformations

Cardiology in the Young

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 47-51

  Chandran, Arun ^a   Fricker, F Jay ^a   Schowengerdt, Kenneth O ^a   Cumming, William A ^a   Saidi, Arwa ^a   Spencer, Carolyn T ^a   Paolillo, Joseph ^a   Samyn, Margaret M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomographic angiography; Congenital heart defects

Indexed keywords

IOHEXOL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; INFANT; NEWBORN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT REFERRAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMICS; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RADIOGRAPHY; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FLORIDA; HEART DEFECTS, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 18244378282     PISSN: 10479511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1047951105000107     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Hopkins KL. Pediatric great vessel anomalies: initial clinical experience with spiral computer tomography angiography. Radiology 1996; 200: 811-815.
2. Katz M, Konen E, Rozenman J, Szeinberg A, Itzchak Y. Spiral computer tomography and 3D image reconstruction of vascular rings and associated tracheobronchial anomalies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 564-568.
3. Becker C, Soppa C, Fink U, et al. Spiral computer tomographic angiography and 3-dimensional reconstruction in patients with aortic coarctation. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 1473-1477.
4. Kaemmerer H, Mugge A, Oelert F, et al. Evaluation of the aorta and supra-aortic vessels with spiral computer tomography and 3-dimensional vascular reconstruction after operation of aortic isthmus stenosis. Z Kardiol 1994; 83: 775-783.
5. Shiraishi I, Kato Y, Todoroki H, Satoh H, Hamaoka K. Differential color imaging technique of helical computer tomographic angiography in the diagnosis of total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage. Circulation 2000; 101: 2017-2018.
6. Tsai-Goodman B, Geva T, Odegard KC, Sena LM, Powell AJ. Clinical role, accuracy, and technical aspects of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in infants. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 69-74.
7. Odegard KC, DiNardo JA, Tsai-Goodman B, et al. Anesthesia considerations for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in infants and small children. Paediatr Anaesth 2004; 14: 471-476.
8. Pihkala J, Nykanen D, Freedome RM, Benson LN. Interventional cardiac catheterisation. Pediatr Clin North Am 1999; 46: 441-464.
9. Korperich H, Gieseke J, Barth P, et al. Flow volume and shunt quantification in pediatric congenital heart disease by real-time magnetic resonance velocity mapping: a validation study. Circulation 2004; 109: 1987-1993.
10. Razavi RS, Hill DL, Muthurangu V, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of congenital cardiac anomalies. Cardiol Young 2003; 13: 461-465.
11. Geva T, Sandweiss BM, Gauvreau K, Lock JE, Powell AJ. Factors associated with impaired clinical status in long-term survivors of tetralogy of Fallot repair evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 43: 1068-1074.
12. Pignatelli RH, McMahon CJ, Chung T, Vick GW III. Role of echocardiography versus magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2003; 18: 357-365.
13. Boxt LM. Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic evaluation of congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 19: 827-847.
14. Siegel MJ. Multiplanar and three-dimensional multi-detector row computer tomography of thoracic vessels and airways in the pediatric population. Radiology 2003; 229: 641-650.
15. Lee ED, Siegel MJ, Hildebolt CF, et al. Multidetector computer tomography evaluation of thoracic aortic anomalies in pediatric patients and young adults: comparison of axial, multiplanar, and 3-dimensional images. Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182: 777-784.
16. Lawler LP, Fishman EK. Multi-detector row computer tomography of thoracic disease with emphasis on 3-dimensional volume rendering and computer tomographic angiography. Radiographics 2001; 21: 1257-1273.
17. Frush DP, Donnelly LF, Rosen NS. Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 951-957.
18. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D, et al. Non invasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast enhanced multi-detector computer tomography: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 911-916.
19. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ, et al. Non-invasive cardiac angiography with multi-slice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart 2002; 88: 470-474.