Phase diagram of the two-channel Kondo lattice model in one dimension

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 94, Issue 14, 2005, Pages

  Schauerte, T ^a   Cox, D L ^a   Noack, R M ^b   Van Dongen, P G J ^c   Batista, C D ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENSITY MATRIX; PARAMAGNETIC METALLIC PHASES; QUANTUM CRITICAL POINT (QCP); TWO-CHANNEL KONDO LATTICE MODEL;

ANTIFERROMAGNETIC MATERIALS; FERMI LIQUIDS; HAMILTONIANS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PARAMAGNETIC MATERIALS; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; PHASE DIAGRAMS; QUANTUM THEORY;

MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

EID: 18244378263     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.147201     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. L. D. Landau, JETP 30, 1058 (1956).
2. J. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); S. Tomonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 554 (1950); for a review, see H. J. Schulz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 57 (1991).
3. J. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); S. Tomonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 554 (1950); for a review, see H. J. Schulz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 57 (1991).
4. J. Luttinger, J. Math. Phys. (N.Y.) 4, 1154 (1963); S. Tomonaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 5, 554 (1950); for a review, see H. J. Schulz, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 5, 57 (1991).
5. H. v. Löhneysen, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 9689 (1996).
6. P. Nozières and A. Blandin, J. Phys. (Paris) 41, 193 (1980).
7. D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1240 (1987); D. L. Cox and M. B. Maple, Phys. Today 48, No. 2, 32 (1995).
8. D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1240 (1987); D. L. Cox and M. B. Maple, Phys. Today 48, No. 2, 32 (1995).
9. A. W. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3160 (1991); P. Schlottmann and P. D. Sacramento, Adv. Phys. 42, 641 (1993); N. Andrei and C. Destri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 364 (1984).
10. A. W. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3160 (1991); P. Schlottmann and P. D. Sacramento, Adv. Phys. 42, 641 (1993); N. Andrei and C. Destri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 364 (1984).
11. A. W. W. Ludwig and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3160 (1991); P. Schlottmann and P. D. Sacramento, Adv. Phys. 42, 641 (1993); N. Andrei and C. Destri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 364 (1984).
12. H. Amitsuka et al., Physica (Amsterdam) 186B-188B, 337 (1993).
13. B. Andraka and A. M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2886 (1991).
14. J. R. Schrieffer and P. A. Wolff, Phys. Rev. 149, 491 (1966).
15. P. Sinjukow and W. Nolting, Phys. Rev. B 65, 212303 (2002).
16. A. M. Tsvelik and C. I. Ventura, Phys. Rev. B 61, 15538 (2000).
17. N. Andrei and E. Orignac, Phys. Rev. B 62, R3596 (2000).
18. M. Jarrell, H. Pang, D. L. Cox, and K. H. Luk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1612 (1996); M. Jarrell, H. Pang, and D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1996 (1997).
19. M. Jarrell, H. Pang, D. L. Cox, and K. H. Luk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1612 (1996); M. Jarrell, H. Pang, and D. L. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1996 (1997).
20. M. Troyer and D. Würtz, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2886 (1993); R. M. Fye and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3177 (1990); I. P. McCulloch, A. Juozapavicius, A. Rosengren, and M. Gulacsi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 52410 (2002).
21. M. Troyer and D. Würtz, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2886 (1993); R. M. Fye and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3177 (1990); I. P. McCulloch, A. Juozapavicius, A. Rosengren, and M. Gulacsi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 52410 (2002).
22. M. Troyer and D. Würtz, Phys. Rev. B 47, 2886 (1993); R. M. Fye and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3177 (1990); I. P. McCulloch, A. Juozapavicius, A. Rosengren, and M. Gulacsi, Phys. Rev. B 65, 52410 (2002).
23. H. Tsunetsugu, M. Sigrist, and K. Ueda, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 809 (1997).
24. M. Sigrist, H. Tsunetsugu, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2211 (1991).
25. M. Sigrist, K. Ueda, and H. Tsunetsugu, Phys. Rev. B 46, 175 (1992).
26. M. Sigrist, H. Tsunetsugu, K. Ueda, and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 46, 13838 (1992); C. D. Batista, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 166403 (2002).
27. M. Sigrist, H. Tsunetsugu, K. Ueda, and T. M. Rice, Phys. Rev. B 46, 13838 (1992); C. D. Batista, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 166403 (2002).
28. H. Tsunetsugu, Y. Hatsugai, K. Ueda, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. B 46, R3175 (1992); H. Tsunetsugu, M. Sigrist, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 47, R8345 (1993).
29. H. Tsunetsugu, Y. Hatsugai, K. Ueda, and M. Sigrist, Phys. Rev. B 46, R3175 (1992); H. Tsunetsugu, M. Sigrist, and K. Ueda, Phys. Rev. B 47, R8345 (1993).
30. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992); Phys. Rev. B 48, 10 345 (1993).
31. S. R. White, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992); Phys. Rev. B 48, 10 345 (1993).
32. M. Guerrero and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3707 (1996); 63, 144423 (2001).
33. M. Guerrero and R. M. Noack, Phys. Rev. B 53, 3707 (1996); 63, 144423 (2001).
34. N. Shibata, K. Ueda, T. Nishino, and C. Ishii, Phys. Rev. B 54, 13 495 (1996).
35. f(q) is due to the open boundary conditions in the DMRG simulations.
36. G. Honner and M. Gulácsi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2180 (1997); Phys. Rev. B 58, 2662 (1998).
37. G. Honner and M. Gulácsi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2180 (1997); Phys. Rev. B 58, 2662 (1998).
38. H. A. Bethe, Z. Phys. 71, 205 (1931); C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev. 150, 321 (1966).
39. H. A. Bethe, Z. Phys. 71, 205 (1931); C. N. Yang and C. P. Yang, Phys. Rev. 150, 321 (1966).
40. R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge, New York, 1999).